Literature DB >> 33761885

Differential polarization and the expression of efferocytosis receptor MerTK on M1 and M2 macrophages isolated from coronary artery disease patients.

Fatin Najiah Mohd Idrus1, Nurul Shuhadah Ahmad2, Chee Hock Hoe2, Maryam Azlan1, Farisha Alia Norfuad1, Zurkurnai Yusof3, Wan Yus Haniff Wan Isa3, Akbar Ali Mohamed Ali3, Get Bee Yvonne-Tee4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differential polarization of macrophage into M1 and M2 mediates atherosclerotic plaque clearance through efferocytosis. Higher expression of Mer proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase (MerTK) on M2 macrophage helps in maintaining macrophage efferocytic efficiency. In healthy individuals, macrophage polarization into M1 and M2 occurs in tissues in concomitance with the acquisition of functional phenotypes depending on specific microenvironment stimuli. However, whether the macrophage differential polarization and MerTK expression vary in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients remain unknown.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the polarization of M1 and M2 macrophage from CAD patients as well as to investigate the expression of MerTK in these macrophage phenotypes.
METHODS: A total of 14 (n) CAD patients were recruited and subsequently grouped into "no apparent CAD", "non-obstructive CAD" and "obstructive CAD" according to the degree of stenosis. Thirty ml of venous blood was withdrawn to obtain monocyte from the patients. The M1 macrophage was generated by treating the monocyte with GMCSF, LPS and IFN-γ while MCSF, IL-4 and IL-13 were employed to differentiate monocyte into M2 macrophage. After 7 days of polarization, analysis of cell surface differentiation markers (CD86+/CD80+ for M1 and CD206+/CD200R+ for M2) and measurement of MerTK expression were performed using flow cytometry.
RESULTS: Both M1 and M2 macrophage expressed similar level of CD86, CD80 and CD206 in all groups of CAD patients. MerTK expression in no apparent CAD patients was significantly higher in M2 macrophage compared to M1 macrophage [12.58 ± 4.40 vs. 6.58 ± 1.37, p = 0.040].
CONCLUSION: Differential polarization of macrophage into M1 and M2 was highly dynamic and can be varied due to the microenvironment stimuli in atherosclerotic plaque. Besides, higher expression of MerTK in patients with the least coronary obstructive suggest its vital involvement in efferocytosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell surface differentiation marker; Coronary artery disease; Efferocytosis; Macrophage polarization; Mer proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33761885      PMCID: PMC7992933          DOI: 10.1186/s12865-021-00410-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Immunol        ISSN: 1471-2172            Impact factor:   3.615


  40 in total

1.  Nonobstructive coronary artery disease and risk of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Thomas M Maddox; Maggie A Stanislawski; Gary K Grunwald; Steven M Bradley; P Michael Ho; Thomas T Tsai; Manesh R Patel; Amneet Sandhu; Javier Valle; David J Magid; Benjamin Leon; Deepak L Bhatt; Stephan D Fihn; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  PPARgamma activation primes human monocytes into alternative M2 macrophages with anti-inflammatory properties.

Authors:  M Amine Bouhlel; Bruno Derudas; Elena Rigamonti; Rébecca Dièvart; John Brozek; Stéphan Haulon; Christophe Zawadzki; Brigitte Jude; Gérard Torpier; Nikolaus Marx; Bart Staels; Giulia Chinetti-Gbaguidi
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 27.287

3.  Efficient clearance of early apoptotic cells by human macrophages requires M2c polarization and MerTK induction.

Authors:  Gaetano Zizzo; Brendan A Hilliard; Marc Monestier; Philip L Cohen
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 4.  Metabolism of innate immune cells: impact on atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Niels P Riksen; Rinke Stienstra
Journal:  Curr Opin Lipidol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.776

Review 5.  Apoptotic cell clearance: basic biology and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Ivan K H Poon; Christopher D Lucas; Adriano G Rossi; Kodi S Ravichandran
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 53.106

6.  Functional heterogeneity of colony-stimulating factor-induced human monocyte-derived macrophages.

Authors:  Kiyoko S Akagawa; Iwao Komuro; Hiroko Kanazawa; Toshio Yamazaki; Keiko Mochida; Fumio Kishi
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 6.424

7.  Adherence influences monocyte responsiveness to interleukin-10.

Authors:  Anne-France Petit-Bertron; Catherine Fitting; Jean-Marc Cavaillon; Minou Adib-Conquy
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.962

8.  Different responses to oxidized low-density lipoproteins in human polarized macrophages.

Authors:  Kuniaki Hirose; Kazuhisa Iwabuchi; Kazunori Shimada; Takashi Kiyanagi; Chihiro Iwahara; Hitoshi Nakayama; Hiroyuki Daida
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 9.  Understanding the Mysterious M2 Macrophage through Activation Markers and Effector Mechanisms.

Authors:  Tamás Rőszer
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 4.711

10.  Clinical significance of macrophage phenotypes in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Heather J Medbury; Helen Williams; John P Fletcher
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2014-11-21
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A Bibliometric and Knowledge-Map Analysis of Macrophage Polarization in Atherosclerosis From 2001 to 2021.

Authors:  Luxia Song; Jie Zhang; Dan Ma; Yixuan Fan; Runmin Lai; Wende Tian; Zihao Zhang; Jianqing Ju; Hao Xu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 8.786

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.