Heather Kelker1, Kyle Yoder1, Paul Musey1, Madison Harris2, Olivia Johnson2, Elisa Sarmiento2, Punit Vyas2, Brooke Henderson1, Zachary Adams3, Julie Welch4. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1701 N. Senate Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. 2. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1701 N. Senate Blvd, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. jlwelch@iu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While COVID-19 has had far-reaching consequences on society and health care providers, there is a paucity of research exploring frontline emergency medicine (EM) provider wellness over the course of a pandemic. The objective of this study was to assess the well-being, resilience, burnout, and wellness factors and needs of EM physicians and advanced practice providers (e.g., nurse practitioners and physician assistants; APPs) during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A descriptive, prospective, cohort survey study of EM physicians and APPs was performed across ten emergency departments in a single state, including academic and community settings. Participants were recruited via email to complete four weekly, voluntary, anonymous questionnaires comprised of customized and validated tools for assessing wellness (Well Being Index), burnout (Physician Work Life Study item), and resilience (Brief Resilience Scale) during the initial acceleration phase of COVID-19. Univariate and multivariate analysis with Chi-squared, Fisher's Exact, and logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Of 213 eligible participants, response rates ranged from 31 to 53% over four weeks. Women comprised 54 to 60% of responses. Nonrespondent characteristics were similar to respondents. Concern for personal safety decreased from 85 to 61% (p < 0.001). Impact on basic self-care declined from 66 to 32% (p < 0.001). Symptoms of stress, anxiety, or fear was initially 83% and reduced to 66% (p = 0.009). Reported strain on relationships and feelings of isolation affected > 50% of respondents initially without significant change (p = 0.05 and p = 0.30 respectively). Women were nearly twice as likely to report feelings of isolation as men (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.82-5.88). Working part-time carried twice the risk of burnout (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.10-5.47). Baseline resilience was normal to high. Provider well-being improved over the four weeks (30 to 14%; p = 0.01), but burnout did not significantly change (30 to 22%; p = 0.39). CONCLUSION: This survey of frontline EM providers, including physicians and APPs, during the initial surge of COVID-19 found that despite being a resilient group, the majority experienced stress, anxiety, fear, and concerns about personal safety due to COVID-19, putting many at risk for burnout. The sustained impact of the pandemic on EM provider wellness deserves further investigation to guide targeted interventions.
BACKGROUND: While COVID-19 has had far-reaching consequences on society and health care providers, there is a paucity of research exploring frontline emergency medicine (EM) provider wellness over the course of a pandemic. The objective of this study was to assess the well-being, resilience, burnout, and wellness factors and needs of EM physicians and advanced practice providers (e.g., nurse practitioners and physician assistants; APPs) during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A descriptive, prospective, cohort survey study of EM physicians and APPs was performed across ten emergency departments in a single state, including academic and community settings. Participants were recruited via email to complete four weekly, voluntary, anonymous questionnaires comprised of customized and validated tools for assessing wellness (Well Being Index), burnout (Physician Work Life Study item), and resilience (Brief Resilience Scale) during the initial acceleration phase of COVID-19. Univariate and multivariate analysis with Chi-squared, Fisher's Exact, and logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Of 213 eligible participants, response rates ranged from 31 to 53% over four weeks. Women comprised 54 to 60% of responses. Nonrespondent characteristics were similar to respondents. Concern for personal safety decreased from 85 to 61% (p < 0.001). Impact on basic self-care declined from 66 to 32% (p < 0.001). Symptoms of stress, anxiety, or fear was initially 83% and reduced to 66% (p = 0.009). Reported strain on relationships and feelings of isolation affected > 50% of respondents initially without significant change (p = 0.05 and p = 0.30 respectively). Women were nearly twice as likely to report feelings of isolation as men (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.82-5.88). Working part-time carried twice the risk of burnout (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.10-5.47). Baseline resilience was normal to high. Provider well-being improved over the four weeks (30 to 14%; p = 0.01), but burnout did not significantly change (30 to 22%; p = 0.39). CONCLUSION: This survey of frontline EM providers, including physicians and APPs, during the initial surge of COVID-19 found that despite being a resilient group, the majority experienced stress, anxiety, fear, and concerns about personal safety due to COVID-19, putting many at risk for burnout. The sustained impact of the pandemic on EM provider wellness deserves further investigation to guide targeted interventions.
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Omar Hasan; Lotte N Dyrbye; Christine Sinsky; Daniel Satele; Jeff Sloan; Colin P West Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Colin P West; Christine Sinsky; Mickey Trockel; Michael Tutty; Daniel V Satele; Lindsey E Carlasare; Lotte N Dyrbye Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Liselotte N Dyrbye; Matthew R Thomas; F Stanford Massie; David V Power; Anne Eacker; William Harper; Steven Durning; Christine Moutier; Daniel W Szydlo; Paul J Novotny; Jeff A Sloan; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-09-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Anthony C Waddimba; Melissa Scribani; Melinda A Nieves; Nicole Krupa; John J May; Paul Jenkins Journal: Eval Health Prof Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Keri J S Brady; Mickey T Trockel; Christina T Khan; Kristin S Raj; Mary Lou Murphy; Bryan Bohman; Erica Frank; Alan K Louie; Laura Weiss Roberts Journal: Acad Psychiatry Date: 2017-09-14
Authors: Douglas A Mata; Marco A Ramos; Narinder Bansal; Rida Khan; Constance Guille; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Srijan Sen Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robert G Maunder; Natalie D Heeney; Jonathan J Hunter; Gillian Strudwick; Lianne P Jeffs; Leanne Ginty; Jennie Johnstone; Alex Kiss; Carla A Loftus; Lesley A Wiesenfeld Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 2.862
Authors: Michael J Van Wert; Sonal Gandhi; Ishaan Gupta; Amteshwar Singh; Shaker M Eid; M Haroon Burhanullah; Henry Michtalik; Mansoor Malik Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Erin Dehon; Kori S Zachrison; Jennifer Peltzer-Jones; Ramin R Tabatabai; Elizabeth Clair; Michael A Puskarich; Amy Ondeyka; Katherine Dixon-Gordon; Lauren A Walter; Elaine H Situ-LaCasse; Megan L Fix Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2021-10-27
Authors: Chengshi Shiu; Wei-Ti Chen; Chia-Chun Hung; Edward Pei-Chuan Huang; Tony Szu-Hsien Lee Journal: J Formos Med Assoc Date: 2021-10-09 Impact factor: 3.871
Authors: Janice Blanchard; Anne M Messman; Suzanne K Bentley; Michelle D Lall; Yiju Teresa Liu; Rory Merritt; Randy Sorge; Jordan M Warchol; Christopher Greene; Deborah B Diercks; James Griffith; Rita A Manfredi; Melissa McCarthy Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2022-05-22 Impact factor: 5.221