Ariella R Korn1, Ross A Hammond2,3, Erin Hennessy1, Aviva Must4, Mark C Pachucki5, Christina D Economos1. 1. Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, USA. 3. Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA. 4. Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Sociology and Computational Social Science Institute, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Abstract
Background: Community coalitions often lead and coordinate "whole-of-community" childhood obesity prevention interventions. A growing body of work suggests that coalition network ties, which facilitate transmission of information and advocacy, may be a key part of how such leadership operates. This study provides an understanding of the structure of coalition networks and how this structure changes over time. Methods: We administered semiannual network surveys during a pilot whole-of-community intervention in Somerville, MA (2015-2017). Participants included 16 multisector coalition members and their nominated discussion partners ("first-degree alters") related to childhood obesity prevention. Coalition and first-degree alter respondents named up to 20 discussion partners and reported ties' interaction frequency and perceived influence. Networks were assessed with visualization, descriptive analysis, and exponential random graph models. Results: Total network included 558 stakeholders representing community-based organizations, parents, health care, childcare, universities, among others. Size and membership varied over time. We observed the largest network (n = 256) during intervention planning, and the largest proportion of stakeholders communicating frequently (daily/weekly) about childhood obesity prevention during the peak intervention period. Networks were sparsely interconnected (1%-3% of possible ties observed) and most and least centralized at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Over time, ties were increasingly perceived as influential and siloed within community groups. Conclusions: The network's extensive evolving membership may indicate access to a wide range of resources, ideas, and an ability to broadly disseminate intervention messages. The attenuating network hierarchy over time may have supported more equal participation and control over intervention efforts. Future research should assess generalizability of network patterns, network influences on implementation processes, and possible network interventions.
Background: Community coalitions often lead and coordinate "whole-of-community" childhood obesity prevention interventions. A growing body of work suggests that coalition network ties, which facilitate transmission of information and advocacy, may be a key part of how such leadership operates. This study provides an understanding of the structure of coalition networks and how this structure changes over time. Methods: We administered semiannual network surveys during a pilot whole-of-community intervention in Somerville, MA (2015-2017). Participants included 16 multisector coalition members and their nominated discussion partners ("first-degree alters") related to childhood obesity prevention. Coalition and first-degree alter respondents named up to 20 discussion partners and reported ties' interaction frequency and perceived influence. Networks were assessed with visualization, descriptive analysis, and exponential random graph models. Results: Total network included 558 stakeholders representing community-based organizations, parents, health care, childcare, universities, among others. Size and membership varied over time. We observed the largest network (n = 256) during intervention planning, and the largest proportion of stakeholders communicating frequently (daily/weekly) about childhood obesity prevention during the peak intervention period. Networks were sparsely interconnected (1%-3% of possible ties observed) and most and least centralized at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Over time, ties were increasingly perceived as influential and siloed within community groups. Conclusions: The network's extensive evolving membership may indicate access to a wide range of resources, ideas, and an ability to broadly disseminate intervention messages. The attenuating network hierarchy over time may have supported more equal participation and control over intervention efforts. Future research should assess generalizability of network patterns, network influences on implementation processes, and possible network interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
childhood obesity prevention; community coalitions; social network analysis; whole-of-community interventions
Authors: Harry Rutter; Natalie Savona; Ketevan Glonti; Jo Bibby; Steven Cummins; Diane T Finegood; Felix Greaves; Laura Harper; Penelope Hawe; Laurence Moore; Mark Petticrew; Eva Rehfuess; Alan Shiell; James Thomas; Martin White Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ariella R Korn; Erin Hennessy; Ross A Hammond; Steven Allender; Matthew W Gillman; Matt Kasman; Jaimie McGlashan; Lynne Millar; Brynle Owen; Mark C Pachucki; Boyd Swinburn; Alison Tovar; Christina D Economos Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Ruth F Hunter; Kayla de la Haye; Jennifer M Murray; Jennifer Badham; Thomas W Valente; Mike Clarke; Frank Kee Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Sharron J Crowder; Andrea L Tanner; Martha A Dawson; Irene C Felsman; Susan B Hassmiller; Lisa C Miller; Susan C Rinehard; Debra A Toney Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 3.315