Literature DB >> 33761098

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with preceptor's assistance: the training experience and outcomes in South America.

Marcos Flávio Holanda Rocha1, Jurandir Maraes Picanço Neto2, Pedro Henrique de Oliveira Filgueira2, Rafael Ferreira Coelho3, Marcio Covas Moschovas4, Vipul Patel4.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is currently the second leading cause of cancer deaths in Brazilian men. In 2020, sixty-five thousand new prostate cancer cases were expected in Brazil, and almost 30% of these patients are estimated to be from the northeast region. However, from 75 robotic platforms available in the country, only one is accessible in the state of Ceará since 2015. This study reports the intraoperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer performed by robotic surgeons during a training period supervised by a proctor. We also compared these results with the literature reporting the experience of different Brazilian centers. We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data of 58 initial cases of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy at a private Brazilian hospital in Fortaleza, Ceará. The surgeries were performed by two robotic surgeons during the training period under proctor supervision. We reported the epidemiological and intraoperative data, complications, pathological report, functional and oncological outcomes. The median operative time was 180 min. None of the patients needed conversion or blood transfusion. The pathology report described 21.81% of positive surgical margins (16.27% of all pT2 and 45.45% of all pT3 patients). The median follow-up was 40 months. Biochemical recurrence occurred in 21.73%, continence in 92%, and potency in 79.54%. No major complications (Clavien grades III-V) were reported. In our experience, robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by surgeons training with proctor's assistance is feasible and safe. The operative time, complication rates, functional and oncological outcomes were satisfactory and compatible with the literature.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Education; Prostate cancer; Robotic surgical procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33761098     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01233-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  2 in total

1.  Evidence-based evolution of our robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) technique through 13,000 cases.

Authors:  Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat; Marcio Covas Moschovas; Fikret Fatih Onol; Travis Rogers; Sunil Sandadi Reddy; Cathy Corder; Shannon Roof; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-10-10

Review 2.  Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update.

Authors:  Ofer Yossepowitch; Alberto Briganti; James A Eastham; Jonathan Epstein; Markus Graefen; Rodolfo Montironi; Karim Touijer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 20.096

  2 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Neurovascular bundle preservation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: How I do it after 15.000 cases.

Authors:  Marcio Covas Moschovas; Vipul Patel
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.