Literature DB >> 33761047

Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses of an Ambrosia Beetle to Volatiles of its Nutritional Fungal Symbiont.

Christopher M Ranger1, Marek Dzurenko2,3, Jenny Barnett4, Ruchika Geedi4, Louela Castrillo5, Matthew Ethington6, Matthew Ginzel6,7, Karla Addesso8, Michael E Reding4.   

Abstract

Ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) cultivate their fungal symbiont within host substrates as the sole source of nutrition on which the larvae and adults must feed. To investigate a possible role for semiochemicals in this interaction, we characterized electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Xylosandrus germanus to volatiles associated with its fungal symbiont Ambrosiella grosmanniae. During still-air walking bioassays, X. germanus exhibited an arrestment response to volatiles of A. grosmanniae, but not antagonistic fungi Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium brunneum, Trichoderma harzianum, the plant pathogen Fusarium proliferatum, or malt extract agar. Solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry identified 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, 2-phenylethanol, methyl benzoate and 3-methyl-1-butanol in emissions from A. grosmanniae; the latter two compounds were also detected in emissions from B. bassiana. Concentration-responses using electroantennography documented weak depolarizations to A. grosmanniae fungal volatiles, unlike the comparatively strong response to ethanol. When tested singly in walking bioassays, volatiles identified from A. grosmanniae elicited relatively weak arrestment responses, unlike the responses to ethanol. Xylosandrus germanus also exhibited weak or no long-range attraction to the fungal volatiles when tested singly during field trials in 2016-2018. None of the fungal volatiles enhanced attraction of X. germanus to ethanol when tested singly; in contrast, 2-phenylethanol and 3-methyl-1-butanol consistently reduced attraction to ethanol. Volatiles emitted by A. grosmanniae may represent short-range olfactory cues that could aid in distinguishing their nutritional fungal symbiont from other fungi, but these compounds are not likely to be useful as long-range attractants for improving detection or mass trapping tactics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambrosiella grosmanniae; Fungal volatiles; Symbiosis; Xylosandrus germanus

Year:  2021        PMID: 33761047     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-021-01263-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  20 in total

1.  The scent of a partner: ambrosia beetles are attracted to volatiles from their fungal symbionts.

Authors:  Jiri Hulcr; Rajinder Mann; Lukasz L Stelinski
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Larval helpers and age polyethism in ambrosia beetles.

Authors:  Peter H W Biedermann; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Advances and challenges in the identification of volatiles that mediate interactions among plants and arthropods.

Authors:  Marco D'Alessandro; Ted C J Turlings
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 4.616

4.  Volatile organic compounds released by the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana.

Authors:  R Crespo; N Pedrini; M P Juárez; G M Dal Bello
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 5.415

5.  Comparison of volatile compounds released by entomopathogenic fungi.

Authors:  Aleksandra Bojke; Cezary Tkaczuk; Piotr Stepnowski; Marek Gołębiowski
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2018-06-24       Impact factor: 5.415

6.  Microbial volatile emissions as insect semiochemicals.

Authors:  Thomas Seth Davis; Tawni L Crippen; Richard W Hofstetter; Jeffery K Tomberlin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Xylosandrus germanus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Occurrence, Fungal Associations, and Management Trials in New York Apple Orchards.

Authors:  Arthur M Agnello; Deborah I Breth; Elizabeth M Tee; Kerik D Cox; Sara M Villani; Katrin M Ayer; Anna E Wallis; Daniel J Donahue; David B Combs; Abagail E Davis; Joshua A Neal; Forrest M English-Loeb
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Test of nonhost angiosperm volatiles and verbenone to protect trap trees for Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) from attacks by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in the northeastern United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Dodds; Daniel R Miller
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Semiochemical parsimony in the Arthropoda.

Authors:  M S Blum
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 19.686

10.  Fungal Volatiles Can Act as Carbon Sources and Semiochemicals to Mediate Interspecific Interactions Among Bark Beetle-Associated Fungal Symbionts.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cale; R Maxwell Collignon; Jennifer G Klutsch; Sanat S Kanekar; Altaf Hussain; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.