Diane Boinon1,2, Cécile Charles3,4, Léonor Fasse3,4, Jonathan Journiac4, Gloria Pallubicki3, Kristopher Lamore4, Grégory Ninot5, Estelle Guerdoux-Ninot5, Sébastien Gouy3, Laurence Albiges3, Suzette Delaloge3, David Malka3, David Planchard3, Josée Savard6,7,8, Sarah Dauchy3. 1. Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, F-94805, Villejuif Cedex, France. diane.boinon@gustaveroussy.fr. 2. Université de Paris, LPPS, F-92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. diane.boinon@gustaveroussy.fr. 3. Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, F-94805, Villejuif Cedex, France. 4. Université de Paris, LPPS, F-92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. 5. Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France. 6. School of Psychology, Université Laval, Québec, Canada. 7. Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Canada. 8. Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Insomnia affects up to 63% of patients with cancer. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is considered to be the non-pharmacological gold standard treatment, but it remains underutilized in France. Self-administered interventions offer new ways to overcome some of the barriers that restrict access to efficacious supportive care. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, among French adult cancer outpatients, of a validated Quebec video-based, self-administered, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (VCBT-I). METHODS: A pre-post design with quantitative measures (Insomnia Severity Index, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, Treatment Perception Questionnaire) and qualitative measures (semi-structured interviews) was used. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-three cancer outpatients were self-screened for insomnia, and 57% (n=99) reported significant symptoms. Among them, 80% (n=79) agreed to participate in the VCBT-I. The download rate of the VCBT-I was 78% (n=62/79). Several technical and contextual barriers to the delivery and the applicability of the VCBT-I emerged. However, participants reported a high level of satisfaction, and some valuable benefits at post-immediate intervention (increased knowledge about sleep, better quality of sleep, and higher acceptance of the burden of insomnia), regardless of whether or not they still had insomnia. DISCUSSION: This study confirms that there is a demand for a VCBT-I, which was perceived as appropriate by a sample of French cancer outpatients with insomnia, but it also highlights some limitations in terms of implementation and practicality. Remote professional support appears to be a core need in order to address these issues and personalize the guidance process.
BACKGROUND:Insomnia affects up to 63% of patients with cancer. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is considered to be the non-pharmacological gold standard treatment, but it remains underutilized in France. Self-administered interventions offer new ways to overcome some of the barriers that restrict access to efficacious supportive care. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, among French adult cancer outpatients, of a validated Quebec video-based, self-administered, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (VCBT-I). METHODS: A pre-post design with quantitative measures (Insomnia Severity Index, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, Treatment Perception Questionnaire) and qualitative measures (semi-structured interviews) was used. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-three cancer outpatients were self-screened for insomnia, and 57% (n=99) reported significant symptoms. Among them, 80% (n=79) agreed to participate in the VCBT-I. The download rate of the VCBT-I was 78% (n=62/79). Several technical and contextual barriers to the delivery and the applicability of the VCBT-I emerged. However, participants reported a high level of satisfaction, and some valuable benefits at post-immediate intervention (increased knowledge about sleep, better quality of sleep, and higher acceptance of the burden of insomnia), regardless of whether or not they still had insomnia. DISCUSSION: This study confirms that there is a demand for a VCBT-I, which was perceived as appropriate by a sample of French cancer outpatients with insomnia, but it also highlights some limitations in terms of implementation and practicality. Remote professional support appears to be a core need in order to address these issues and personalize the guidance process.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia; Insomnia; Self-administered intervention; Video
Authors: Jillian A Johnson; Joshua A Rash; Tavis S Campbell; Josée Savard; Philip R Gehrman; Michael Perlis; Linda E Carlson; Sheila N Garland Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Katharina Schieber; Alexander Niecke; Franziska Geiser; Yesim Erim; Corinna Bergelt; Antje Büttner-Teleaga; Imad Maatouk; Barbara Stein; Martin Teufel; Martin Wickert; Alexander Wuensch; Joachim Weis Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Charles M Morin; Richard R Bootzin; Daniel J Buysse; Jack D Edinger; Colin A Espie; Kenneth L Lichstein Journal: Sleep Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Doris Howell; Thomas K Oliver; Sue Keller-Olaman; Judith Davidson; Sheila Garland; Charles Samuels; Josée Savard; Cheryl Harris; Michèle Aubin; Karin Olson; Jonathan Sussman; James Macfarlane; Claudette Taylor Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-05-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Daniel L Hall; Kimberly A Arditte Hall; Mark J Gorman; Amy Comander; Michael R Goldstein; Tony J Cunningham; Sarah Wieman; Helen R Mizrach; Brooke C Juhel; Raissa Li; Alexandros Markowitz; Michael Grandner; Elyse R Park Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 6.860