Literature DB >> 33760929

[Status of minimally invasive gastrectomy : Current advancements: robotic surgery and intraoperative imaging for gastric cancer].

Felix Berlth1, Luise Knospe2, Boris Jansen-Winkeln2, Edin Hadzijusufovic3, Evangelos Tagkalos3, Stefan Niebisch2, Yusef Moulla2, Claire Chalopin4, Hannes Köhler4, Marianne Maktabi4, Hauke Lang3, Peter Grimminger3, Ines Gockel2.   

Abstract

The surgical treatment of gastric cancer has arrived at a turning point towards the routine application of minimally invasive techniques. After the first results of prospective randomized trials from Asia confirmed the surgical and oncological safety, the latest results of international trials provided evidence for minimally invasive gastrectomy of advanced gastric cancer in a multimodal setting. A new addition in the field of minimally invasive procedures is robotic-assisted surgical techniques, which have already been implemented for these indications in many centers in Germany. The technical advantages that are applicable in the robotics setting in comparison to laparoscopy lead to a rapid dissemination of the procedure but still need to be evaluated in controlled trials. Further developments for the surgical treatment of gastric cancer are found in the field of intraoperative imaging procedures. In this field various technologies are available, such as fluorescence imaging using a near-infrared camera, which requires the use of a fluorescent agent or the hyperspectral camera system, which does not require the application of a fluorophore and merges pictures from visible and non-visible wavelengths to a functional image. It is to be expected that in the future various technological advancements can make a valuable contribution to the surgical treatment of gastric cancer in the clinical routine, especially if they support and facilitate the use of minimally invasive surgical techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Hyperspectral camera; Intraoperative imaging; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33760929     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01391-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  4 in total

1.  Average treatment effect of robotic versus laparoscopic rectal surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Leonardo Solaini; Federico Perna; Davide Cavaliere; Carla Vaccaro; Andrea Avanzolini; Alessandro Cucchetti; Andrea Coratti; Giorgio Ercolani
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.547

2.  Mortality and Complications Following Visceral Surgery: A Nationwide Analysis Based on the Diagnostic Categories Used in German Hospital Invoicing Data.

Authors:  Philip Baum; Johannes Diers; Sven Lichthardt; Carolin Kastner; Nicolas Schlegel; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Armin Wiegering
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Does intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography decrease the incidence of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dongliang Liu; Lichuan Liang; Liu Liu; Zhiqiang Zhu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Comparison of hyperspectral imaging and fluorescence angiography for the determination of the transection margin in colorectal resections-a comparative study.

Authors:  Yusef Moulla; Ines Gockel; Boris Jansen-Winkeln; Isabell Germann; Hannes Köhler; Matthias Mehdorn; Marianne Maktabi; Robert Sucher; Manuel Barberio; Claire Chalopin; Michele Diana
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Patient-reported gastrointestinal symptoms following surgery for gastric cancer and the relative risk factors.

Authors:  Rui Xu; Qiong Gu; Shuomeng Xiao; Ping Zhao; Zhi Ding
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.