Literature DB >> 33759381

Direct and Label-Free Cell Status Monitoring of Spheroids and Microcarriers Using Microfluidic Impedance Cytometry.

Lingyan Gong1, Chayakorn Petchakup1, Pujiang Shi2, Pei Leng Tan2, Lay Poh Tan2, Chor Yong Tay2,3,4,5, Han Wei Hou1,6,7.   

Abstract

3D cellular spheroids/microcarriers (100 µm-1 mm) are widely used in biomanufacturing, and non-invasive biosensors are useful to monitor cell quality in bioprocesses. In this work, a novel microfluidic approach for label-free and continuous-flow monitoring of single spheroid/microcarrier (hydrogel and Cytodex) based on electrical impedance spectroscopy using co-planar Field's metal electrodes is reported. Through numerical simulation and experimental validation, two unique impedance signatures (|ZLF | (60 kHz), |ZHF | (1 MHz)) which are optimal for spheroid growth and viability monitoring are identified. Using a closed-loop recirculation system, it is demonstrated that |ZLF | increases with breast cancer (MCF-7) spheroid biomass, while higher opacity (impedance ratio |ZHF |/|ZLF |) indicates cell death due to compromised cell membrane. Anti-cancer drug (paclitaxel)-treated spheroids also exhibit lower |ZLF | with increased cell dissociation. Interestingly, impedance characterization of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell differentiation on Cytodex microcarriers reveals that adipogenic cells (higher intracellular lipid content) exhibit higher impedance than osteogenic cells (more conductive due to calcium ions) for both microcarriers and single cell level. Taken together, the developed platform offers great versatility for multi-parametric analysis of spheroids/microcarriers at high throughput (≈1 particle/s), and can be readily integrated into bioreactors for long-term and remote monitoring of biomass and cell quality.
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomanufacturing; impedance cytometry; label-free; microfluidics; stem cell differentiation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33759381     DOI: 10.1002/smll.202007500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Small        ISSN: 1613-6810            Impact factor:   13.281


  6 in total

1.  What is the future of electrical impedance spectroscopy in flow cytometry?

Authors:  Furkan Gökçe; Paolo S Ravaynia; Mario M Modena; Andreas Hierlemann
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Assessment of the electrical penetration of cell membranes using four-frequency impedance cytometry.

Authors:  Tao Tang; Xun Liu; Yapeng Yuan; Tianlong Zhang; Ryota Kiya; Yang Yang; Kengo Suzuki; Yo Tanaka; Ming Li; Yoichiroh Hosokawa; Yaxiaer Yalikun
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 8.006

3.  Modified Red Blood Cells as Multimodal Standards for Benchmarking Single-Cell Cytometry and Separation Based on Electrical Physiology.

Authors:  Armita Salahi; Carlos Honrado; Aditya Rane; Federica Caselli; Nathan S Swami
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Validation of a Lab-on-Chip Assay for Measuring Sorafenib Effectiveness on HCC Cell Proliferation.

Authors:  Emanuele Piccinno; Anna Grazia Monteduro; Francesco Dituri; Silvia Rizzato; Gianluigi Giannelli; Giuseppe Maruccio
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Microcarriers in application for cartilage tissue engineering: Recent progress and challenges.

Authors:  Sheng-Long Ding; Xin Liu; Xi-Yuan Zhao; Ke-Tao Wang; Wei Xiong; Zi-Li Gao; Cheng-Yi Sun; Min-Xuan Jia; Cheng Li; Qi Gu; Ming-Zhu Zhang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 6.  Current strategies with implementation of three-dimensional cell culture: the challenge of quantification.

Authors:  Jonathan Temple; Eirini Velliou; Mona Shehata; Raphaël Lévy
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.661

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.