Literature DB >> 33759177

A Novel CYP2C-Haplotype Associated With Ultrarapid Metabolism of Escitalopram.

Line Skute Bråten1,2, Tore Haslemo1,2, Marin M Jukic3,4, Maxim Ivanov5, Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg3, Espen Molden1,6, Marianne Kristiansen Kringen1,2.   

Abstract

Escitalopram is one of the most commonly used antidepressant drugs but exhibits a substantial interindividual variation in clinical response. A key factor underlying response differences is the polymorphic nature of the CYP2C19 gene encoding the major enzyme responsible for escitalopram metabolism. Although pre-emptive CYP2C19 genotyping may improve escitalopram treatment outcome by dose individualization, much of the interindividual variability cannot be assigned to the currently known CYP2C19 gene variants. The aim of the present study was to search for novel CYP2C-haplotypes for better genetic prediction of escitalopram metabolism. First, the CYP2C18/CYP2C19 locus was sequenced from gDNA obtained from 24 patients previously genotyped as CYP2C19*1/*1 showing consistently low serum concentrations of escitalopram (< 25 nM/10 mg). Three new haplotypes of the CYP2C locus (CYP2C:TG, CYP2C:TA, and CYP2C:CG) were here identified, and their functional roles were evaluated using gDNA from 875 previously genotyped escitalopram-treated patients. The CYP2C:CG and CYP2C:TA haplotypes had no significant impact on escitalopram concentration. Based on the estimated effects of the novel CYP2C-haplotypes on escitalopram exposure, the predicted serum concentrations of escitalopram in homozygous CYP2C:TG and CYP2C19*17 carriers were 24.8% and 17.3% lower compared with the baseline (CYP2C:CG and CYP2C:TA), respectively. In conclusion, a novel CYP2C-haplotype defined by rs2860840T and rs11188059G associated with ultrarapid metabolism of escitalopram was identified. Further studies should clarify the genetic basis for the enhanced escitalopram metabolism and the impact of the CYP2C:TG haplotype on the metabolism of other CYP2C19 substrates like omeprazole, voriconazole, and clopidogrel.
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2021 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33759177     DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  3 in total

1.  Epigenetic signatures in antidepressant treatment response: a methylome-wide association study in the EMC trial.

Authors:  J Engelmann; L Zillich; J Frank; S Wagner; M Cetin; D P Herzog; M B Müller; A Tadic; J C Foo; L Sirignano; D F Braus; N Dahmen; S Sordon; M Riemenschneider; C Spaniol; G Gasparoni; M Rietschel; S H Witt; K Lieb; F Streit
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 7.989

2.  Omeprazole Treatment Failure in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Genetic Variation at the CYP2C Locus.

Authors:  Ping Siu Kee; Simran D S Maggo; Martin A Kennedy; Murray L Barclay; Allison L Miller; Klaus Lehnert; Maurice A Curtis; Richard L M Faull; Remai Parker; Paul K L Chin
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Cardiovascular Pharmacogenomics: An Update on Clinical Studies of Antithrombotic Drugs in Brazilian Patients.

Authors:  Thiago Dominguez Crespo Hirata; Carolina Dagli-Hernandez; Fabiana Dalla Vecchia Genvigir; Volker Martin Lauschke; Yitian Zhou; Mario Hiroyuki Hirata; Rosario Dominguez Crespo Hirata
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.074

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.