BACKGROUND: Although immunotherapy works well in glioblastoma (GBM) preclinical mouse models, the therapy has not demonstrated efficacy in humans. To address this anomaly, we developed a novel humanized microbiome (HuM) model to study the response to immunotherapy in a preclinical mouse model of GBM. METHODS: We used 5 healthy human donors for fecal transplantation of gnotobiotic mice. After the transplanted microbiomes stabilized, the mice were bred to generate 5 independent humanized mouse lines (HuM1-HuM5). RESULTS: Analysis of shotgun metagenomic sequencing data from fecal samples revealed a unique microbiome with significant differences in diversity and microbial composition among HuM1-HuM5 lines. All HuM mouse lines were susceptible to GBM transplantation, and exhibited similar median survival ranging from 19 to 26 days. Interestingly, we found that HuM lines responded differently to the immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD-1. Specifically, we demonstrate that HuM1, HuM4, and HuM5 mice are nonresponders to anti-PD-1, while HuM2 and HuM3 mice are responsive to anti-PD-1 and displayed significantly increased survival compared to isotype controls. Bray-Curtis cluster analysis of the 5 HuM gut microbial communities revealed that responders HuM2 and HuM3 were closely related, and detailed taxonomic comparison analysis revealed that Bacteroides cellulosilyticus was commonly found in HuM2 and HuM3 with high abundances. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study establish the utility of humanized microbiome mice as avatars to delineate features of the host interaction with gut microbial communities needed for effective immunotherapy against GBM.
BACKGROUND: Although immunotherapy works well in glioblastoma (GBM) preclinical mouse models, the therapy has not demonstrated efficacy in humans. To address this anomaly, we developed a novel humanized microbiome (HuM) model to study the response to immunotherapy in a preclinical mouse model of GBM. METHODS: We used 5 healthy human donors for fecal transplantation of gnotobiotic mice. After the transplanted microbiomes stabilized, the mice were bred to generate 5 independent humanized mouse lines (HuM1-HuM5). RESULTS: Analysis of shotgun metagenomic sequencing data from fecal samples revealed a unique microbiome with significant differences in diversity and microbial composition among HuM1-HuM5 lines. All HuM mouse lines were susceptible to GBM transplantation, and exhibited similar median survival ranging from 19 to 26 days. Interestingly, we found that HuM lines responded differently to the immune checkpoint inhibitor anti-PD-1. Specifically, we demonstrate that HuM1, HuM4, and HuM5 mice are nonresponders to anti-PD-1, while HuM2 and HuM3 mice are responsive to anti-PD-1 and displayed significantly increased survival compared to isotype controls. Bray-Curtis cluster analysis of the 5 HuM gut microbial communities revealed that responders HuM2 and HuM3 were closely related, and detailed taxonomic comparison analysis revealed that Bacteroides cellulosilyticus was commonly found in HuM2 and HuM3 with high abundances. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study establish the utility of humanized microbiome mice as avatars to delineate features of the host interaction with gut microbial communities needed for effective immunotherapy against GBM.
Authors: Kurt A Schalper; Maria E Rodriguez-Ruiz; Ricardo Diez-Valle; Alvaro López-Janeiro; Angelo Porciuncula; Miguel A Idoate; Susana Inogés; Carlos de Andrea; Ascensión López-Diaz de Cerio; Sonia Tejada; Pedro Berraondo; Franz Villarroel-Espindola; Jungmin Choi; Alfonso Gúrpide; Miriam Giraldez; Iosune Goicoechea; Jaime Gallego Perez-Larraya; Miguel F Sanmamed; Jose L Perez-Gracia; Ignacio Melero Journal: Nat Med Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Fredrik Bäckhed; Claire M Fraser; Yehuda Ringel; Mary Ellen Sanders; R Balfour Sartor; Philip M Sherman; James Versalovic; Vincent Young; B Brett Finlay Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: F Stephen Hodi; Steven J O'Day; David F McDermott; Robert W Weber; Jeffrey A Sosman; John B Haanen; Rene Gonzalez; Caroline Robert; Dirk Schadendorf; Jessica C Hassel; Wallace Akerley; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Jose Lutzky; Paul Lorigan; Julia M Vaubel; Gerald P Linette; David Hogg; Christian H Ottensmeier; Celeste Lebbé; Christian Peschel; Ian Quirt; Joseph I Clark; Jedd D Wolchok; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason Tian; Michael J Yellin; Geoffrey M Nichol; Axel Hoos; Walter J Urba Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Craig L Maynard; Laurie E Harrington; Karen M Janowski; James R Oliver; Carlene L Zindl; Alexander Y Rudensky; Casey T Weaver Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2007-08-12 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Antonio Dono; Anthony Patrizz; Ryan M McCormack; Nagireddy Putluri; Bhanu P Ganesh; Balveen Kaur; Louise D McCullough; Leomar Y Ballester; Yoshua Esquenazi Journal: CNS Oncol Date: 2020-06-30
Authors: Timothy F Cloughesy; Aaron Y Mochizuki; Joey R Orpilla; Willy Hugo; Alexander H Lee; Tom B Davidson; Anthony C Wang; Benjamin M Ellingson; Julie A Rytlewski; Catherine M Sanders; Eric S Kawaguchi; Lin Du; Gang Li; William H Yong; Sarah C Gaffey; Adam L Cohen; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Eudocia Q Lee; David A Reardon; Barbara J O'Brien; Nicholas A Butowski; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Jennifer L Clarke; Isabel C Arrillaga-Romany; Howard Colman; Thomas J Kaley; John F de Groot; Linda M Liau; Patrick Y Wen; Robert M Prins Journal: Nat Med Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Amy I Yu; Lili Zhao; Kathryn A Eaton; Sharon Ho; Jiachen Chen; Sara Poe; James Becker; Allison Gonzalez; Delaney McKinstry; Muneer Hasso; Jonny Mendoza-Castrejon; Joel Whitfield; Charles Koumpouras; Patrick D Schloss; Eric C Martens; Grace Y Chen Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2020-04-07 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Jeffrey W Tyner; Franziska Haderk; Anbarasu Kumaraswamy; Linda B Baughn; Brian Van Ness; Song Liu; Himangi Marathe; Joshi J Alumkal; Trever G Bivona; Keith Syson Chan; Brian J Druker; Alan D Hutson; Peter S Nelson; Charles L Sawyers; Christopher D Willey Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Antonio Dono; Jack Nickles; Ana G Rodriguez-Armendariz; Braden C McFarland; Nadim J Ajami; Leomar Y Ballester; Jennifer A Wargo; Yoshua Esquenazi Journal: Neurooncol Adv Date: 2022-04-14