Literature DB >> 3375881

Physical examination: a revered skill under scrutiny.

D A Nardone1, L M Lucas, D M Palac.   

Abstract

Clinicians in the 1980s rely on the physical examination to a lesser degree than their predecessors in making diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. The major criticisms are that the physical examination lacks sensitivity for many common diseases and has not been subjected to the same scientific scrutiny afforded laboratory testing. On the positive side, the physical examination is a series of diagnostic maneuvers that permit physicians to test hypotheses generated during history taking, to determine disease severity, and to lessen clinical uncertainty. Furthermore, the physical examination fosters the development of personalized medical care and a bond of mutual trust between patient and doctor. The challenge for tomorrow is to determine the operating characteristics of physical examination techniques and the clinical utility of physical findings. For preclinical students, emphasis should be directed at basic examination principles and sequencing. Many model programs have used patient instructors and other innovative techniques. Clinical students and postgraduate trainees need emphasis on interpretation of physical findings and their integration into the clinical context. There is no substitute for bedside teaching at this level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3375881     DOI: 10.1097/00007611-198806000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  7 in total

1.  Using a multimedia tool to improve cardiac auscultation knowledge and skills.

Authors:  D T Stern; R S Mangrulkar; L D Gruppen; A L Lang; C M Grum; R D Judge
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Prostate-specific antigen coordinated with digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  W H Cooner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  An evaluation of the core physical exam in patients with minor peripheral chief complaints.

Authors:  R M Rodriguez; M A Phelps
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Birth, death, and resurrection of the physical examination: clinical and academic perspectives on bedside diagnosis.

Authors:  A J Peixoto
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

5.  Ultrasound and stethoscope as tools in medical education and practice: considerations for the archives.

Authors:  Francis A Fakoya; Maira du Plessis; Ikechi B Gbenimacho
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2016-07-13

6.  Automatic pulmonary auscultation grading diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China with artificial intelligence algorithms: A cohort study.

Authors:  Hongling Zhu; Jinsheng Lai; Bingqiang Liu; Ziyuan Wen; Yulong Xiong; Honglin Li; Yuhua Zhou; Qiuyun Fu; Guoyi Yu; Xiaoxiang Yan; Xiaoyun Yang; Jianmin Zhang; Chao Wang; Hesong Zeng
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  "Heidelberg standard examination" and "Heidelberg standard procedures" - Development of faculty-wide standards for physical examination techniques and clinical procedures in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  C Nikendei; P Ganschow; J B Groener; S Huwendiek; A Köchel; N Köhl-Hackert; R Pjontek; J Rodrian; F Scheibe; A-K Stadler; T Steiner; J Stiepak; J Tabatabai; A Utz; M Kadmon
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.