Literature DB >> 33758682

Neural Connectivity Subtypes Predict Discrete Attentional Bias Profiles Among Heterogeneous Anxiety Patients.

Rebecca B Price1, Adriene M Beltz2, Mary L Woody1, Logan Cummings3, Danielle Gilchrist1, Greg J Siegle1.   

Abstract

On average, anxious patients show altered attention to threat-including early vigilance towards threat and later avoidance of threat-accompanied by altered functional connectivity across brain regions. However, substantial heterogeneity within clinical, neural, and attentional features of anxiety is overlooked in typical group-level comparisons. We used a well-validated method for data-driven parsing of neural connectivity to reveal connectivity-based subgroups among 60 adults with transdiagnostic anxiety. Subgroups were externally compared on attentional patterns derived from independent behavioral measures. Two subgroups emerged. Subgroup A (68% of patients) showed stronger executive network influences on sensory processing regions and a paradigmatic "vigilance-avoidance" pattern on external behavioral measures. Subgroup B was defined by a larger number of limbic influences on sensory regions and exhibited a more atypical and inconsistent attentional profile. Neural connectivity-based categorization revealed an atypical, limbic-driven pattern of connectivity in a subset of anxious patients that generalized to atypical patterns of selective attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anxiety; attentional bias; community detection; fMRI; individual-level functional connectivity

Year:  2020        PMID: 33758682      PMCID: PMC7983837          DOI: 10.1177/2167702620906149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci        ISSN: 2167-7034


  63 in total

1.  Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias.

Authors:  Colin MacLeod; Elizabeth Rutherford; Lyn Campbell; Greg Ebsworthy; Lin Holker
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2002-02

2.  Towards personalized, brain-based behavioral intervention for transdiagnostic anxiety: Transient neural responses to negative images predict outcomes following a targeted computer-based intervention.

Authors:  Rebecca B Price; Logan Cummings; Danielle Gilchrist; Simona Graur; Layla Banihashemi; Susan S Kuo; Greg J Siegle
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2018-12

3.  Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Yair Bar-Haim; Dominique Lamy; Lee Pergamin; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg; Marinus H van IJzendoorn
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 4.  Attentional bias for threat: Crisis or opportunity?

Authors:  Richard J McNally
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

5.  Behavioral interpretations of intrinsic connectivity networks.

Authors:  Angela R Laird; P Mickle Fox; Simon B Eickhoff; Jessica A Turner; Kimberly L Ray; D Reese McKay; David C Glahn; Christian F Beckmann; Stephen M Smith; Peter T Fox
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Unreliability as a threat to understanding psychopathology: The cautionary tale of attentional bias.

Authors:  Thomas L Rodebaugh; Rachel B Scullin; Julia K Langer; David J Dixon; Jonathan D Huppert; Amit Bernstein; Ariel Zvielli; Eric J Lenze
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2016-06-20

7.  Quantitative evaluation of the clinical efficacy of attention bias modification treatment for anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Marian Linetzky; Lee Pergamin-Hight; Daniel S Pine; Yair Bar-Haim
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 6.505

8.  A meta-analysis of bias at baseline in RCTs of attention bias modification: No evidence for dot-probe bias towards threat in clinical anxiety and PTSD.

Authors:  Anne-Wil Kruijt; Sam Parsons; Elaine Fox
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2019-08

Review 9.  Attention Bias Modification (ABM): Review of Effects of Multisession ABM Training on Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention in High-Anxious Individuals.

Authors:  Karin Mogg; Allison M Waters; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26

Review 10.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: an integrative account.

Authors:  Sonia J Bishop
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  6 in total

1.  Resting state functional connectivity subtypes predict discrete patterns of cognitive-affective functioning across levels of analysis among patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Mary L Woody; Benjamin Panny; Michelle Degutis; Angela Griffo; Rebecca B Price
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2021-09-02

2.  Neural heterogeneity underlying late adolescent motivational processing is linked to individual differences in behavioral sensation seeking.

Authors:  Michael I Demidenko; Edward D Huntley; Alexander S Weigard; Daniel P Keating; Adriene M Beltz
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  Detecting Task-Dependent Functional Connectivity in Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation with Person-Specific Hemodynamic Response Functions.

Authors:  Kelly A Duffy; Zachary F Fisher; Cara A Arizmendi; Peter C M Molenaar; Joseph Hopfinger; Jessica R Cohen; Adriene M Beltz; Martin A Lindquist; Michael N Hallquist; Kathleen M Gates
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2021-04-26

4.  Cortical and subcortical brain structure in generalized anxiety disorder: findings from 28 research sites in the ENIGMA-Anxiety Working Group.

Authors:  Anderson M Winkler; Daniel S Pine; Anita Harrewijn; Elise M Cardinale; Nynke A Groenewold; Janna Marie Bas-Hoogendam; Moji Aghajani; Kevin Hilbert; Narcis Cardoner; Daniel Porta-Casteràs; Savannah Gosnell; Ramiro Salas; Andrea P Jackowski; Pedro M Pan; Giovanni A Salum; Karina S Blair; James R Blair; Mira Z Hammoud; Mohammed R Milad; Katie L Burkhouse; K Luan Phan; Heidi K Schroeder; Jeffrey R Strawn; Katja Beesdo-Baum; Neda Jahanshad; Sophia I Thomopoulos; Randy Buckner; Jared A Nielsen; Jordan W Smoller; Jair C Soares; Benson Mwangi; Mon-Ju Wu; Giovana B Zunta-Soares; Michal Assaf; Gretchen J Diefenbach; Paolo Brambilla; Eleonora Maggioni; David Hofmann; Thomas Straube; Carmen Andreescu; Rachel Berta; Erica Tamburo; Rebecca B Price; Gisele G Manfro; Federica Agosta; Elisa Canu; Camilla Cividini; Massimo Filippi; Milutin Kostić; Ana Munjiza Jovanovic; Bianca A V Alberton; Brenda Benson; Gabrielle F Freitag; Courtney A Filippi; Andrea L Gold; Ellen Leibenluft; Grace V Ringlein; Kathryn E Werwath; Hannah Zwiebel; André Zugman; Hans J Grabe; Sandra Van der Auwera; Katharina Wittfeld; Henry Völzke; Robin Bülow; Nicholas L Balderston; Monique Ernst; Christian Grillon; Lilianne R Mujica-Parodi; Helena van Nieuwenhuizen; Hugo D Critchley; Elena Makovac; Matteo Mancini; Frances Meeten; Cristina Ottaviani; Tali M Ball; Gregory A Fonzo; Martin P Paulus; Murray B Stein; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Antonia N Kaczkurkin; Bart Larsen; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Jennifer Harper; Michael Myers; Michael T Perino; Chad M Sylvester; Qiongru Yu; Ulrike Lueken; Dick J Veltman; Paul M Thompson; Dan J Stein; Nic J A Van der Wee
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 7.989

5.  Intrauterine Device Use: A New Frontier for Behavioral Neuroendocrinology.

Authors:  Adriene M Beltz; Michael I Demidenko; Natasha Chaku; Kelly L Klump; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 6.  ENIGMA-anxiety working group: Rationale for and organization of large-scale neuroimaging studies of anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Janna Marie Bas-Hoogendam; Nynke A Groenewold; Moji Aghajani; Gabrielle F Freitag; Anita Harrewijn; Kevin Hilbert; Neda Jahanshad; Sophia I Thomopoulos; Paul M Thompson; Dick J Veltman; Anderson M Winkler; Ulrike Lueken; Daniel S Pine; Nic J A van der Wee; Dan J Stein
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 5.399

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.