Literature DB >> 33758447

Psychometric Models for Scoring Multiple Reporter Assessments: Applications to Integrative Data Analysis in Prevention Science and Beyond.

Patrick J Curran1, A R Georgeson1, Daniel J Bauer1, Andrea M Hussong1.   

Abstract

Conducting valid and reliable empirical research in the prevention sciences is an inherently difficult and challenging task. Chief among these is the need to obtain numerical scores of underlying theoretical constructs for use in subsequent analysis. This challenge is further exacerbated by the increasingly common need to consider multiple reporter assessments, particularly when using integrative data analysis to fit models to data that have been pooled across two or more independent samples. The current paper uses both simulated and real data to examine the utility of a recently proposed psychometric model for multiple reporter data called the trifactor model (TFM) in settings that might be commonly found in prevention research. Results suggest that numerical scores obtained using the TFM are superior to more traditional methods, particularly when pooling samples that contribute different reporter perspectives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  integrative data analysis; moderated nonlinear factor analysis; multiple reporter assessments; psychometrics; scoring; trifactor model

Year:  2020        PMID: 33758447      PMCID: PMC7983644          DOI: 10.1177/0165025419896620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Behav Dev        ISSN: 0165-0254


  4 in total

1.  A Family Socialization Model of Transdiagnostic Risk for Psychopathology in Preschool Children.

Authors:  Mark Wade; Andre Plamondon; Jennifer M Jenkins
Journal:  Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol       Date:  2021-03-09

2.  Cooperative and Competitive Attitudes During Adolescence and Their Social and Academic Outcomes.

Authors:  You-Kyung Lee; Eunjin Seo
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2022-02-21

3.  Negative Parenting, Adolescents' Emotion Regulation, Self-Efficacy in Emotion Regulation, and Psychological Adjustment.

Authors:  Laura Di Giunta; Carolina Lunetti; Giulia Gliozzo; W Andrew Rothenberg; Jennifer E Lansford; Nancy Eisenberg; Concetta Pastorelli; Emanuele Basili; Irene Fiasconaro; Eriona Thartori; Ainzara Favini; Alessia Teresa Virzì
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Conceptual, methodological, and measurement factors that disqualify use of measurement invariance techniques to detect informant discrepancies in youth mental health assessments.

Authors:  Andres De Los Reyes; Fanita A Tyrell; Ashley L Watts; Gordon J G Asmundson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.