Literature DB >> 33758189

Herbaceous perennial plants with short generation time have stronger responses to climate anomalies than those with longer generation time.

Aldo Compagnoni1,2, Sam Levin3,4, Dylan Z Childs5, Stan Harpole3,4,6, Maria Paniw7, Gesa Römer8,9, Jean H Burns10, Judy Che-Castaldo11, Nadja Rüger4,12,13, Georges Kunstler14, Joanne M Bennett3,4,15, C Ruth Archer16,17, Owen R Jones8,9, Roberto Salguero-Gómez18, Tiffany M Knight3,4,19.   

Abstract

There is an urgent need to synthesize the state of our knowledge on plant responses to climate. The availability of open-access data provide opportunities to examine quantitative generalizations regarding which biomes and species are most responsive to climate drivers. Here, we synthesize time series of structured population models from 162 populations of 62 plants, mostly herbaceous species from temperate biomes, to link plant population growth rates (λ) to precipitation and temperature drivers. We expect: (1) more pronounced demographic responses to precipitation than temperature, especially in arid biomes; and (2) a higher climate sensitivity in short-lived rather than long-lived species. We find that precipitation anomalies have a nearly three-fold larger effect on λ than temperature. Species with shorter generation time have much stronger absolute responses to climate anomalies. We conclude that key species-level traits can predict plant population responses to climate, and discuss the relevance of this generalization for conservation planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33758189      PMCID: PMC7988175          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21977-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   17.694


  29 in total

Review 1.  Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels.

Authors:  Wim H Van der Putten; Mirka Macel; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability.

Authors:  Alistair W R Seddon; Marc Macias-Fauria; Peter R Long; David Benz; Kathy J Willis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Longevity can buffer plant and animal populations against changing climatic variability.

Authors:  William F Morris; Catherine A Pfister; Shripad Tuljapurkar; Chirrakal V Haridas; Carol L Boggs; Mark S Boyce; Emilio M Bruna; Don R Church; Tim Coulson; Daniel F Doak; Stacey Forsyth; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Carol C Horvitz; Susan Kalisz; Bruce E Kendall; Tiffany M Knight; Charlotte T Lee; Eric S Menges
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Global trait-environment relationships of plant communities.

Authors:  Helge Bruelheide; Jürgen Dengler; Oliver Purschke; Jonathan Lenoir; Borja Jiménez-Alfaro; Stephan M Hennekens; Zoltán Botta-Dukát; Milan Chytrý; Richard Field; Florian Jansen; Jens Kattge; Valério D Pillar; Franziska Schrodt; Miguel D Mahecha; Robert K Peet; Brody Sandel; Peter van Bodegom; Jan Altman; Esteban Alvarez-Dávila; Mohammed A S Arfin Khan; Fabio Attorre; Isabelle Aubin; Christopher Baraloto; Jorcely G Barroso; Marijn Bauters; Erwin Bergmeier; Idoia Biurrun; Anne D Bjorkman; Benjamin Blonder; Andraž Čarni; Luis Cayuela; Tomáš Černý; J Hans C Cornelissen; Dylan Craven; Matteo Dainese; Géraldine Derroire; Michele De Sanctis; Sandra Díaz; Jiří Doležal; William Farfan-Rios; Ted R Feldpausch; Nicole J Fenton; Eric Garnier; Greg R Guerin; Alvaro G Gutiérrez; Sylvia Haider; Tarek Hattab; Greg Henry; Bruno Hérault; Pedro Higuchi; Norbert Hölzel; Jürgen Homeier; Anke Jentsch; Norbert Jürgens; Zygmunt Kącki; Dirk N Karger; Michael Kessler; Michael Kleyer; Ilona Knollová; Andrey Y Korolyuk; Ingolf Kühn; Daniel C Laughlin; Frederic Lens; Jacqueline Loos; Frédérique Louault; Mariyana I Lyubenova; Yadvinder Malhi; Corrado Marcenò; Maurizio Mencuccini; Jonas V Müller; Jérôme Munzinger; Isla H Myers-Smith; David A Neill; Ülo Niinemets; Kate H Orwin; Wim A Ozinga; Josep Penuelas; Aaron Pérez-Haase; Petr Petřík; Oliver L Phillips; Meelis Pärtel; Peter B Reich; Christine Römermann; Arthur V Rodrigues; Francesco Maria Sabatini; Jordi Sardans; Marco Schmidt; Gunnar Seidler; Javier Eduardo Silva Espejo; Marcos Silveira; Anita Smyth; Maria Sporbert; Jens-Christian Svenning; Zhiyao Tang; Raquel Thomas; Ioannis Tsiripidis; Kiril Vassilev; Cyrille Violle; Risto Virtanen; Evan Weiher; Erik Welk; Karsten Wesche; Marten Winter; Christian Wirth; Ute Jandt
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  Microclimatic conditions anywhere at any time!

Authors:  Jonas J Lembrechts; Jonathan Lenoir
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 10.863

6.  Life history tactics shape amphibians' demographic responses to the North Atlantic Oscillation.

Authors:  Hugo Cayuela; Pierre Joly; Benedikt R Schmidt; Julian Pichenot; Eric Bonnaire; Pauline Priol; Olivier Peyronel; Mathias Laville; Aurélien Besnard
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Response of vegetation to drought time-scales across global land biomes.

Authors:  Sergio M Vicente-Serrano; Célia Gouveia; Jesús Julio Camarero; Santiago Beguería; Ricardo Trigo; Juan I López-Moreno; César Azorín-Molina; Edmond Pasho; Jorge Lorenzo-Lacruz; Jesús Revuelto; Enrique Morán-Tejeda; Arturo Sanchez-Lorenzo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Direct effects dominate responses to climate perturbations in grassland plant communities.

Authors:  Chengjin Chu; Andrew R Kleinhesselink; Kris M Havstad; Mitchel P McClaran; Debra P Peters; Lance T Vermeire; Haiyan Wei; Peter B Adler
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Losing half the conductive area hardly impacts the water status of mature trees.

Authors:  Lars Dietrich; Günter Hoch; Ansgar Kahmen; Christian Körner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Biotic and anthropogenic forces rival climatic/abiotic factors in determining global plant population growth and fitness.

Authors:  William F Morris; Johan Ehrlén; Johan P Dahlgren; Alexander K Loomis; Allison M Louthan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  Geographic variation in offspring size: Long- and short-term climate affect mean seed mass of Streptanthus populations.

Authors:  Natalie L R Love; Susan J Mazer
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.431

Review 2.  A sex skew in life-history research: the problem of missing males.

Authors:  C Ruth Archer; Maria Paniw; Regina Vega-Trejo; Irem Sepil
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Detecting climate signals in populations across life histories.

Authors:  Stéphanie Jenouvrier; Matthew C Long; Christophe F D Coste; Marika Holland; Marlène Gamelon; Nigel G Yoccoz; Bernt-Erik Saether
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 13.211

4.  Life history predicts global population responses to the weather in terrestrial mammals.

Authors:  John Jackson; Christie Le Coeur; Owen Jones
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Distribution of Biodiversity of Wild Beet Species (Genus Beta L.) in Armenia under Ongoing Climate Change Conditions.

Authors:  Anna Avetisyan; Tatevik Aloyan; Amalya Iskandaryan; Margarita Harutyunyan; Laura Jaakola; Andreas Melikyan
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.