Davida M Schiff1, Jonathan J K Stoltman, Timothy C Nielsen, Sara Myers, Moira Nolan, Mishka Terplan, Stephen W Patrick, Timothy E Wilens, John Kelly. 1. Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital for Children, Boston, MA (DMS, MN); Opioid Policy Institute, Little Rock, AR (JJKS); Children's Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health; University of Sydney, Sydney Australia (TCN); Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH (SM); Friends Research Institute, Baltimore, MD (MT); Departments of Pediatrics and Mildred Stahlman Division of Neonatology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (SWP); Center for Child Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (SWP); Vanderbilt Center for Child Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN (SWP); Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (TEW); Recovery Research Institute, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (JK).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which colloquial phrases used to describe opioid-exposed mother-infant dyads affects attitudes toward mothers with opioid use disorder (OUD) to assess the role stigmatizing language may have on the care of mothers with OUD. METHODS: We employed a randomized, cross-sectional, case vignette of an opioid-exposed dyad, varying on 2 factors: (1) language to describe newborn ("substance-exposed newborn" vs "addicted baby") and (2) type of maternal opioid use (injection heroin vs nonmedical use of prescription opioids). Participants were recruited using an online survey platform. Substance-related stigma, punitive-blaming, and supportive scales were constructed to assess attitudes. Two-way analyses of variance were conducted to determine mean scale differences by vignette. Posthoc analyses assessed individual item-level differences. RESULTS: Among 1227 respondents, we found a small statistical difference between language and opioid type factors for the supportive scale only (F = 4.31, η2 = .004, P = 0.038), with greater agreement with supportive statements when describing injection heroin use, compared to prescription opioid use, for the "substance-exposed newborn" vignette only. In posthoc analyses, greater than 85% of respondents agreed the mother was "responsible for her opioid use," her "addiction was caused by poor choices," and that she "put her baby in danger." CONCLUSIONS: We found no major differences in attitudes regardless of vignette received. Overall, respondents supported opportunities for maternal recovery yet blamed women, describing mothers as culpable for causing harm to their newborn, showcasing internally conflicting views. These views could contribute to ongoing stigma and avoidance of care among pregnant women with OUD.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which colloquial phrases used to describe opioid-exposed mother-infant dyads affects attitudes toward mothers with opioid use disorder (OUD) to assess the role stigmatizing language may have on the care of mothers with OUD. METHODS: We employed a randomized, cross-sectional, case vignette of an opioid-exposed dyad, varying on 2 factors: (1) language to describe newborn ("substance-exposed newborn" vs "addicted baby") and (2) type of maternal opioid use (injection heroin vs nonmedical use of prescription opioids). Participants were recruited using an online survey platform. Substance-related stigma, punitive-blaming, and supportive scales were constructed to assess attitudes. Two-way analyses of variance were conducted to determine mean scale differences by vignette. Posthoc analyses assessed individual item-level differences. RESULTS: Among 1227 respondents, we found a small statistical difference between language and opioid type factors for the supportive scale only (F = 4.31, η2 = .004, P = 0.038), with greater agreement with supportive statements when describing injection heroin use, compared to prescription opioid use, for the "substance-exposed newborn" vignette only. In posthoc analyses, greater than 85% of respondents agreed the mother was "responsible for her opioid use," her "addiction was caused by poor choices," and that she "put her baby in danger." CONCLUSIONS: We found no major differences in attitudes regardless of vignette received. Overall, respondents supported opportunities for maternal recovery yet blamed women, describing mothers as culpable for causing harm to their newborn, showcasing internally conflicting views. These views could contribute to ongoing stigma and avoidance of care among pregnant women with OUD.
Authors: Emma E McGinty; Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Julia Baller; Jeff Niederdeppe; Sarah Gollust; Colleen L Barry Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: K M Keyes; M L Hatzenbuehler; K A McLaughlin; B Link; M Olfson; B F Grant; D Hasin Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jason B Luoma; Alyssa K O'Hair; Barbara S Kohlenberg; Steven C Hayes; Lindsay Fletcher Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Yitong Alice Gao; Coleman Drake; Elizabeth E Krans; Qingwen Chen; Marian P Jarlenski Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 4.647