Literature DB >> 33757595

Machine learning-based ability to classify psychosis and early stages of disease through parenting and attachment-related variables is associated with social cognition.

Linda A Antonucci1,2, Alessandra Raio3, Giulio Pergola3,4, Barbara Gelao3, Marco Papalino3, Antonio Rampino3, Ileana Andriola5, Giuseppe Blasi3, Alessandro Bertolino3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent views posited that negative parenting and attachment insecurity can be considered as general environmental factors of vulnerability for psychosis, specifically for individuals diagnosed with psychosis (PSY). Furthermore, evidence highlighted a tight relationship between attachment style and social cognition abilities, a key PSY behavioral phenotype. The aim of this study is to generate a machine learning algorithm based on the perceived quality of parenting and attachment style-related features to discriminate between PSY and healthy controls (HC) and to investigate its ability to track PSY early stages and risk conditions, as well as its association with social cognition performance.
METHODS: Perceived maternal and paternal parenting, as well as attachment anxiety and avoidance scores, were trained to separate 71 HC from 34 PSY (20 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia + 14 diagnosed with bipolar disorder with psychotic manifestations) using support vector classification and repeated nested cross-validation. We then validated this model on independent datasets including individuals at the early stages of disease (ESD, i.e. first episode of psychosis or depression, or at-risk mental state for psychosis) and with familial high risk for PSY (FHR, i.e. having a first-degree relative suffering from psychosis). Then, we performed factorial analyses to test the group x classification rate interaction on emotion perception, social inference and managing of emotions abilities.
RESULTS: The perceived parenting and attachment-based machine learning model discriminated PSY from HC with a Balanced Accuracy (BAC) of 72.2%. Slightly lower classification performance was measured in the ESD sample (HC-ESD BAC = 63.5%), while the model could not discriminate between FHR and HC (BAC = 44.2%). We observed a significant group x classification interaction in PSY and HC from the discovery sample on emotion perception and on the ability to manage emotions (both p = 0.02). The interaction on managing of emotion abilities was replicated in the ESD and HC validation sample (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that parenting and attachment-related variables bear significant classification power when applied to both PSY and its early stages and are associated with variability in emotion processing. These variables could therefore be useful in psychosis early recognition programs aimed at softening the psychosis-associated disability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult attachment style; Bipolar disorder; Machine learning; Parental care; Parental overprotection; Risk for psychosis; Schizophrenia

Year:  2021        PMID: 33757595     DOI: 10.1186/s40359-021-00552-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Psychol        ISSN: 2050-7283


  54 in total

1.  Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model.

Authors:  K Bartholomew; L M Horowitz
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1991-08

2.  Prediction of real-world functional disability in chronic mental disorders: a comparison of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Christopher R Bowie; Colin Depp; John A McGrath; Paula Wolyniec; Brent T Mausbach; Mary H Thornquist; James Luke; Thomas L Patterson; Philip D Harvey; Ann E Pulver
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Sedentary behavior and physical activity levels in people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davy Vancampfort; Joseph Firth; Felipe B Schuch; Simon Rosenbaum; James Mugisha; Mats Hallgren; Michel Probst; Philip B Ward; Fiona Gaughran; Marc De Hert; André F Carvalho; Brendon Stubbs
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  How genes and environmental factors determine the different neurodevelopmental trajectories of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Arsime Demjaha; James H MacCabe; Robin M Murray
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 5.  Parenting after a history of childhood maltreatment: A scoping review and map of evidence in the perinatal period.

Authors:  Catherine Chamberlain; Graham Gee; Stephen Harfield; Sandra Campbell; Sue Brennan; Yvonne Clark; Fiona Mensah; Kerry Arabena; Helen Herrman; Stephanie Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cognitive and functional deficits in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia as a function of the presence and history of psychosis.

Authors:  Christopher R Bowie; Michael W Best; Colin Depp; Brent T Mausbach; Thomas L Patterson; Ann E Pulver; Philip D Harvey
Journal:  Bipolar Disord       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 6.744

Review 7.  Social cognition in schizophrenia in comparison to bipolar disorder: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emre Bora; Christos Pantelis
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Mortality rate trends in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder: a nationwide study with 20 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Line Hosbond Lomholt; Diana Vincens Andersen; Christina Sejrsgaard-Jacobsen; Cagla Margit Øzdemir; Claus Graff; Ole Schjerning; Svend Eggert Jensen; Sune Puggard Vogt Straszek; Rasmus W Licht; Simon Grøntved; René Ernst Nielsen
Journal:  Int J Bipolar Disord       Date:  2019-03-01

9.  Excess mortality, causes of death and life expectancy in 270,770 patients with recent onset of mental disorders in Denmark, Finland and Sweden.

Authors:  Merete Nordentoft; Kristian Wahlbeck; Jonas Hällgren; Jeanette Westman; Urban Osby; Hassan Alinaghizadeh; Mika Gissler; Thomas Munk Laursen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Environmental risk factors for psychosis.

Authors:  Kimberlie Dean; Robin M Murray
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.