Linda A Antonucci1,2, Alessandra Raio3, Giulio Pergola3,4, Barbara Gelao3, Marco Papalino3, Antonio Rampino3, Ileana Andriola5, Giuseppe Blasi3, Alessandro Bertolino3. 1. Department of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Scipione Crisanzio 42, 70122, Bari, Italy. lindaaantonucci@gmail.com. 2. Department of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy. lindaaantonucci@gmail.com. 3. Department of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy. 4. Lieber Institute for Brain Development, Johns Hopkins Medical Campus, Baltimore, MD, USA. 5. Psychiatry Unit, Bari University Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent views posited that negative parenting and attachment insecurity can be considered as general environmental factors of vulnerability for psychosis, specifically for individuals diagnosed with psychosis (PSY). Furthermore, evidence highlighted a tight relationship between attachment style and social cognition abilities, a key PSY behavioral phenotype. The aim of this study is to generate a machine learning algorithm based on the perceived quality of parenting and attachment style-related features to discriminate between PSY and healthy controls (HC) and to investigate its ability to track PSY early stages and risk conditions, as well as its association with social cognition performance. METHODS: Perceived maternal and paternal parenting, as well as attachment anxiety and avoidance scores, were trained to separate 71 HC from 34 PSY (20 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia + 14 diagnosed with bipolar disorder with psychotic manifestations) using support vector classification and repeated nested cross-validation. We then validated this model on independent datasets including individuals at the early stages of disease (ESD, i.e. first episode of psychosis or depression, or at-risk mental state for psychosis) and with familial high risk for PSY (FHR, i.e. having a first-degree relative suffering from psychosis). Then, we performed factorial analyses to test the group x classification rate interaction on emotion perception, social inference and managing of emotions abilities. RESULTS: The perceived parenting and attachment-based machine learning model discriminated PSY from HC with a Balanced Accuracy (BAC) of 72.2%. Slightly lower classification performance was measured in the ESD sample (HC-ESD BAC = 63.5%), while the model could not discriminate between FHR and HC (BAC = 44.2%). We observed a significant group x classification interaction in PSY and HC from the discovery sample on emotion perception and on the ability to manage emotions (both p = 0.02). The interaction on managing of emotion abilities was replicated in the ESD and HC validation sample (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that parenting and attachment-related variables bear significant classification power when applied to both PSY and its early stages and are associated with variability in emotion processing. These variables could therefore be useful in psychosis early recognition programs aimed at softening the psychosis-associated disability.
BACKGROUND: Recent views posited that negative parenting and attachment insecurity can be considered as general environmental factors of vulnerability for psychosis, specifically for individuals diagnosed with psychosis (PSY). Furthermore, evidence highlighted a tight relationship between attachment style and social cognition abilities, a key PSY behavioral phenotype. The aim of this study is to generate a machine learning algorithm based on the perceived quality of parenting and attachment style-related features to discriminate between PSY and healthy controls (HC) and to investigate its ability to track PSY early stages and risk conditions, as well as its association with social cognition performance. METHODS: Perceived maternal and paternal parenting, as well as attachment anxiety and avoidance scores, were trained to separate 71 HC from 34 PSY (20 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia + 14 diagnosed with bipolar disorder with psychotic manifestations) using support vector classification and repeated nested cross-validation. We then validated this model on independent datasets including individuals at the early stages of disease (ESD, i.e. first episode of psychosis or depression, or at-risk mental state for psychosis) and with familial high risk for PSY (FHR, i.e. having a first-degree relative suffering from psychosis). Then, we performed factorial analyses to test the group x classification rate interaction on emotion perception, social inference and managing of emotions abilities. RESULTS: The perceived parenting and attachment-based machine learning model discriminated PSY from HC with a Balanced Accuracy (BAC) of 72.2%. Slightly lower classification performance was measured in the ESD sample (HC-ESD BAC = 63.5%), while the model could not discriminate between FHR and HC (BAC = 44.2%). We observed a significant group x classification interaction in PSY and HC from the discovery sample on emotion perception and on the ability to manage emotions (both p = 0.02). The interaction on managing of emotion abilities was replicated in the ESD and HC validation sample (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that parenting and attachment-related variables bear significant classification power when applied to both PSY and its early stages and are associated with variability in emotion processing. These variables could therefore be useful in psychosis early recognition programs aimed at softening the psychosis-associated disability.
Authors: Christopher R Bowie; Colin Depp; John A McGrath; Paula Wolyniec; Brent T Mausbach; Mary H Thornquist; James Luke; Thomas L Patterson; Philip D Harvey; Ann E Pulver Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Davy Vancampfort; Joseph Firth; Felipe B Schuch; Simon Rosenbaum; James Mugisha; Mats Hallgren; Michel Probst; Philip B Ward; Fiona Gaughran; Marc De Hert; André F Carvalho; Brendon Stubbs Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Catherine Chamberlain; Graham Gee; Stephen Harfield; Sandra Campbell; Sue Brennan; Yvonne Clark; Fiona Mensah; Kerry Arabena; Helen Herrman; Stephanie Brown Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christopher R Bowie; Michael W Best; Colin Depp; Brent T Mausbach; Thomas L Patterson; Ann E Pulver; Philip D Harvey Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Line Hosbond Lomholt; Diana Vincens Andersen; Christina Sejrsgaard-Jacobsen; Cagla Margit Øzdemir; Claus Graff; Ole Schjerning; Svend Eggert Jensen; Sune Puggard Vogt Straszek; Rasmus W Licht; Simon Grøntved; René Ernst Nielsen Journal: Int J Bipolar Disord Date: 2019-03-01