Literature DB >> 33757461

Preparedness for self-isolation or quarantine and lockdown in South Africa: results from a rapid online survey.

Sibusiso Sifunda1, Tholang Mokhele1, Thabang Manyaapelo2, Natisha Dukhi1, Ronel Sewpaul1, Whadi-Ah Parker1, Saahier Parker1, Inbarani Naidoo1, Sean Jooste1, Shandir Ramlagan1, Razia Gaida1, Musawenkosi Mabaso1, Khangelani Zuma1,3, Priscilla Reddy1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 pandemic a public health emergency of international concern. South Africa, like many other countries, initiated a multifaceted national response to the pandemic. Self-isolation and quarantine are essential components of the public health response in the country. This paper examined perceptions and preparedness for self-isolation or quarantine during the initial phase of the pandemic in South Africa.
METHODS: The analysis used data obtained from an online quantitative survey conducted in all nine provinces using a data-free platform. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyse the data.
RESULTS: Of 55,823 respondents, 40.1% reported that they may end up in self-isolation or quarantine, 32.6% did not think that they would and 27.4% were unsure. Preparedness for self-isolation or quarantine was 59.0% for self, 53.8% for child and 59.9% for elderly. The odds of perceived possibility for self-isolation or quarantine were significantly higher among Coloureds, Whites, and Indians/Asians than Black Africans, and among those with moderate or high self-perceived risk of contracting COVID-19 than those with low risk perception. The odds were significantly lower among older age groups than those aged 18-29 years, and those unemployed than fully employed. The odds of preparedness for self-isolation or quarantine were significantly less likely among females than males. Preparedness for self, child and elderly isolation or quarantine was significantly more likely among other population groups than Black Africans and among older age groups than those aged 18-29 years. Preparedness for self, child and elderly isolation or quarantine was significantly less likely among those self-employed than fully employed and those residing in informal dwellings than formal dwellings. In addition, preparedness for self-isolation or quarantine was significantly less likely among those with moderate and high self-perceived risk of contracting COVID-19 than low risk perception.
CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the challenge of implementing self-isolation or quarantine in a country with different and unique social contexts. There is a need for public awareness regarding the importance of self-isolation or quarantine as well as counter measures against contextual factors inhibiting this intervention, especially in impoverished communities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Pandemic; Preparedness; Quarantine; Self-isolation; South Africa

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33757461      PMCID: PMC7987115          DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10628-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  19 in total

1.  South Africans' understanding of and response to the COVID-19 outbreak: An online survey.

Authors:  S P Reddy; R Sewpaul; M Mabaso; S Parker; I Naidoo; S Jooste; T Mokhele; S Sifunda; K Zuma
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  2020-08-11

2.  Self-Isolation Compliance In The COVID-19 Era Influenced By Compensation: Findings From A Recent Survey In Israel.

Authors:  Moran Bodas; Kobi Peleg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  The dynamics of risk perceptions and precautionary behavior in response to 2009 (H1N1) pandemic influenza.

Authors:  Yoko Ibuka; Gretchen B Chapman; Lauren A Meyers; Meng Li; Alison P Galvani
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Mass masking in the COVID-19 epidemic: people need guidance.

Authors:  Chi Chiu Leung; Tai Hing Lam; Kar Keung Cheng
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Current Status of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Therapeutics, and Vaccines for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Dae-Gyun Ahn; Hye-Jin Shin; Mi-Hwa Kim; Sunhee Lee; Hae-Soo Kim; Jinjong Myoung; Bum-Tae Kim; Seong-Jun Kim
Journal:  J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-28       Impact factor: 2.351

6.  Assessing the Role of Voluntary Self-Isolation in the Control of Pandemic Influenza Using a Household Epidemic Model.

Authors:  Qingxia Zhang; Dingcheng Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review.

Authors:  Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit; Verena Mayr; Andreea Iulia Dobrescu; Andrea Chapman; Emma Persad; Irma Klerings; Gernot Wagner; Uwe Siebert; Claudia Christof; Casey Zachariah; Gerald Gartlehner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-08

8.  Africa prepares for coronavirus.

Authors:  Munyaradzi Makoni
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Ethics for pandemics beyond influenza: Ebola, drug-resistant tuberculosis, and anticipating future ethical challenges in pandemic preparedness and response.

Authors:  Maxwell J Smith; Diego S Silva
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015 Jun-Sep

10.  Willingness to Self-Isolate When Facing a Pandemic Risk: Model, Empirical Test, and Policy Recommendations.

Authors:  Xiaojun Zhang; Fanfan Wang; Changwen Zhu; Zhiqiang Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.