Grigori Yourganov1, Brielle C Stark2,3, Julius Fridriksson4, Leonardo Bonilha5, Christopher Rorden6. 1. Advanced Computing and Data Science, Cyberinfrastructure and Technology Integration, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA. 2. Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA. 3. Program in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA. 4. Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA. 5. Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. 6. Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Abstract
Introduction: Stroke can induce large-scale functional reorganization of the brain; however, the spatial patterns of this reorganization remain largely unknown. Methods: Using a large (N = 116) sample of participants who were in the chronic stages of stroke, we present a systematic study of the association between brain damage and functional connectivity (FC) within the intact hemisphere. We computed correlations between regional cortical damage and contralateral FC. Results: We identified left-hemisphere regions that had the most pronounced effect on the right-hemisphere FC, and, conversely, right-hemisphere connections where the effect of damage was particularly strong. Notably, the vast majority of significant correlations were positive: damage was associated with an increase in regional contralateral connectivity. Discussion: These findings lend evidence of the reorganization of contralateral cortical networks as a response to brain damage, which is more pronounced in a set of well-connected regions where connectivity increases with the amount of damage. Impact statement The relatively large sample size combined with our best-of-breed analysis methods provides us with sufficient statistical power and spatial sensitivity to identify a set of brain regions where damage has the strongest impact on contralateral networks, and a set of contralateral functional connections that increase in strength in response to brain damage. Our results demonstrate that the brain's ability to reorganize itself after extensive damage is not distributed equally in space, but is more likely to occur in specific core regions. We believe that the associations between brain damage and increased connectivity in the "intact" hemisphere provide novel, and important, insight into the plasticity of the adult brain.
Introduction: Stroke can induce large-scale functional reorganization of the brain; however, the spatial patterns of this reorganization remain largely unknown. Methods: Using a large (N = 116) sample of participants who were in the chronic stages of stroke, we present a systematic study of the association between brain damage and functional connectivity (FC) within the intact hemisphere. We computed correlations between regional cortical damage and contralateral FC. Results: We identified left-hemisphere regions that had the most pronounced effect on the right-hemisphere FC, and, conversely, right-hemisphere connections where the effect of damage was particularly strong. Notably, the vast majority of significant correlations were positive: damage was associated with an increase in regional contralateral connectivity. Discussion: These findings lend evidence of the reorganization of contralateral cortical networks as a response to brain damage, which is more pronounced in a set of well-connected regions where connectivity increases with the amount of damage. Impact statement The relatively large sample size combined with our best-of-breed analysis methods provides us with sufficient statistical power and spatial sensitivity to identify a set of brain regions where damage has the strongest impact on contralateral networks, and a set of contralateral functional connections that increase in strength in response to brain damage. Our results demonstrate that the brain's ability to reorganize itself after extensive damage is not distributed equally in space, but is more likely to occur in specific core regions. We believe that the associations between brain damage and increased connectivity in the "intact" hemisphere provide novel, and important, insight into the plasticity of the adult brain.
Authors: Antonello Baldassarre; Lenny Ramsey; Carl L Hacker; Alicia Callejas; Serguei V Astafiev; Nicholas V Metcalf; Kristi Zinn; Jennifer Rengachary; Abraham Z Snyder; Alex R Carter; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta Journal: Brain Date: 2014-11-02 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Joshua Sarfaty Siegel; Lenny E Ramsey; Abraham Z Snyder; Nicholas V Metcalf; Ravi V Chacko; Kilian Weinberger; Antonello Baldassarre; Carl D Hacker; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nicolas T Lindau; Balthasar J Bänninger; Miriam Gullo; Nicolas A Good; Lukas C Bachmann; Michelle L Starkey; Martin E Schwab Journal: Brain Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Anneliese B New; Donald A Robin; Amy L Parkinson; Joseph R Duffy; Malcom R McNeil; Olivier Piguet; Michael Hornberger; Cathy J Price; Simon B Eickhoff; Kirrie J Ballard Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Bratislav Mišić; Zainab Fatima; Mary K Askren; Martin Buschkuehl; Nathan Churchill; Bernadine Cimprich; Patricia J Deldin; Susanne Jaeggi; Misook Jung; Michele Korostil; Ethan Kross; Katherine M Krpan; Scott Peltier; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Stephen C Strother; John Jonides; Anthony R McIntosh; Marc G Berman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sigfus Kristinsson; Dirk B den Ouden; Chris Rorden; Roger Newman-Norlund; Jean Neils-Strunjas; Julius Fridriksson Journal: J Stroke Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 8.632
Authors: Emily R Olafson; Keith W Jamison; Elizabeth M Sweeney; Hesheng Liu; Danhong Wang; Joel E Bruss; Aaron D Boes; Amy Kuceyeski Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-10-09 Impact factor: 7.400