Literature DB >> 33756136

Natural image statistics in the dorsal and ventral visual field match a switch in flight behaviour of a hawkmoth.

Ronja Bigge1, Maximilian Pfefferle1, Keram Pfeiffer1, Anna Stöckl2.   

Abstract

Many animals use visual cues to navigate their environment. To encode the large input ranges of natural signals optimally, their sensory systems have adapted to the stimulus statistics experienced in their natural habitats1. A striking example, shared across animal phyla, is the retinal tuning to the relative abundance of blue light from the sky, and green light from the ground, evident in the frequency of each photoreceptor type in the two retinal hemispheres2. By adhering only to specific regions of the visual field that contain the relevant information, as for the high-acuity dorsal regions in the eyes of male flies chasing females3, the neural investment can be further reduced. Regionalisation can even lead to activation of the appropriate visual pathway by target location, rather than by stimulus features. This has been shown in fruit flies, which increase their landing attempts when an expanding disc is presented in their frontal visual field, while lateral presentation increases obstacle avoidance responses4. We here report a similar switch in behavioural responses for extended visual scenes. Using a free-flight paradigm, we show that the hummingbird hawkmoth (Macroglossum stellatarum) responds with flight-control adjustments to translational optic-flow cues exclusively in their ventral and lateral visual fields, while identical stimuli presented dorsally elicit a novel directional flight response. This response split is predicted by our quantitative imaging data from natural visual scenes in a variety of habitats, which demonstrate higher magnitudes of translational optic flow in the ventral hemisphere, and the opposite distribution for contrast edges containing directional information.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33756136     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.02.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  3 in total

1.  Spatial tuning of translational optic flow responses in hawkmoths of varying body size.

Authors:  Rebecca Grittner; Emily Baird; Anna Stöckl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  What and Where: Location-Dependent Feature Sensitivity as a Canonical Organizing Principle of the Visual System.

Authors:  Madineh Sedigh-Sarvestani; David Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 3.  Ecological Entomology: How Is Gibson's Framework Useful?

Authors:  Aimie Berger Dauxère; Julien R Serres; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.769

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.