Literature DB >> 33756049

COVID-19 mortality among kidney transplant candidates is strongly associated with social determinants of health.

Jesse D Schold1,2, Kristen L King3,4, S Ali Husain3,4, Emilio D Poggio5, Laura D Buccini2, Sumit Mohan3,4.   

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all portions of the global population. However, many factors have been shown to be particularly associated with COVID-19 mortality including demographic characteristics, behavior, comorbidities, and social conditions. Kidney transplant candidates may be particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 as many are dialysis-dependent and have comorbid conditions. We examined factors associated with COVID-19 mortality among kidney transplant candidates from the National Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from March 1 to December 1, 2020. We evaluated crude rates and multivariable incident rate ratios (IRR) of COVID-19 mortality. There were 131 659 candidates during the study period with 3534 all-cause deaths and 384 denoted a COVID-19 cause (5.00/1000 person years). Factors associated with increased COVID-19 mortality included increased age, males, higher body mass index, and diabetes. In addition, Blacks (IRR = 1.96, 95% C.I.: 1.43-2.69) and Hispanics (IRR = 3.38, 95% C.I.: 2.46-4.66) had higher COVID-19 mortality relative to Whites. Patients with lower educational attainment, high school or less (IRR = 1.93, 95% C.I.: 1.19-3.12, relative to post-graduate), Medicaid insurance (IRR = 1.73, 95% C.I.: 1.26-2.39, relative to private), residence in most distressed neighborhoods (fifth quintile IRR = 1.93, 95% C.I.: 1.28-2.90, relative to first quintile), and most urban and most rural had higher adjusted rates of COVID-19 mortality. Among kidney transplant candidates in the United States, social determinants of health in addition to demographic and clinical factors are significantly associated with COVID-19 mortality.
© 2021 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research/practice; ethnicity/race; health services and outcomes research; infection and infectious agents; kidney disease; kidney transplantation/nephrology; organ transplantation in general; risk assessment/risk stratification; waitlist management

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33756049      PMCID: PMC8250928          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


body mass index confidence interval coronavirus disease 2019 end‐stage kidney disease glomerulonephritis health resources and services administration incident rate ratio organ procurement and transplantation network polycystic kidney disease scientific registry of transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

The COVID‐19 pandemic has had a profound detrimental health effect on the general population across the globe. In the United States, COVID‐19 was the third leading cause of death in 2020. There are numerous demographic and clinical factors that are associated with susceptibility to contracting COVID‐19 and health consequences of the virus. , , While evidence continues to emerge regarding factors resulting in transmission of COVID‐19, the pandemic has disproportionally affected certain populations with known disparities in access to health care in the United States. This includes racial and ethnic minorities and patients with increased social risk factors. , , , Patients with end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD) are particularly susceptible to the impact of COVID‐19 given increased morbidity and increased need to interact with individuals for health care interventions. Kidney transplant candidates are a select portion of the ESKD population, and factors associated with susceptibility and impact of COVID‐19 may be unique from the broader ESKD or general population. There are currently more than 90,000 kidney transplant candidates in the United States. The effect of demographic characteristics, clinical factors, and social risks on risks of COVID‐19 mortality in the United States has not been comprehensively investigated. Understanding candidates who are at highest risk for the severe effects of COVID‐19 may inform care management, identify interventions tailored to attenuate patient risks, and provide evidence for potential mechanisms for the effects of COVID‐19. There are a number of reports detailing risks of transmission and health consequences of COVID‐19 among the dialysis and transplant recipient population. However, most studies are limited to single center or regional reports and detail different periods of the COVID‐19 pandemic. , , , The risks identified in prior studies may be unique to select regions or during the initial phase of the pandemic. In this study, our primary aims were to identify rates and independent risk factors for COVID‐19 mortality among kidney transplant candidates in the United States over the first 9 months of the pandemic. In particular, our aim was to evaluate factors associated with COVID‐19 mortality comprising demographic characteristics, clinical history, and social conditions to describe the broad array of risks in the population.

METHODS

This study used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). The SRTR data system includes data on all donor, wait‐listed candidates, and transplant recipients in the United States, submitted by the members of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services provides oversight to the activities of the OPTN and SRTR contractors. This study was exempted from approval by the Cleveland Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB# 09–648). The designation of COVID‐19 mortality as a cause of death was implemented by the United Network for Organ Sharing denoted “Infection: Viral – COVID‐19” on April 1, 2020. The numeric codes associated with these were 3916 (kidney alone) and 7247 (kidney‐pancreas). We used the code associated with this cause of death as an indication of COVID‐19 death throughout the study. As these codes we used retrospectively as well (in the weeks prior to April 1), and our study period was March 1‐December 1, 2020. We used this period with consideration for the initiation of the pandemic and documentation of COVID‐19 causes of death and follow‐up when COVID‐19 cases were consistently reported. We considered patients at risk for COVID‐19 mortality from March 1, 2020 for prevalent patients (those on the waiting list on that date) or from the time of candidate listing for those placed on the waiting list during the period. Rates were calculated per 1000 patient year follow‐up and compared between groups using two‐sample t‐tests and ANOVA. We evaluated independent factors associated with COVID‐19 mortality rates using multivariable Poisson models with time at risk for death on the waiting list as an offset variable and reported adjusted incident rate ratios (IRR). In addition to the SRTR data, we used primary candidate residential zip code information to merge other data sources. We merged data with the distressed community index generated from the Economic Innovation Group. These data include an index (0%–100%) of the level of residential distress by zip code in the United States based on residential education, housing vacancy, employment, poverty, income, and changes in business establishments. For the purpose of these analyses, we used the measured quintile of the residential zip code of candidates to merge with SRTR data. Candidates without an available zip code were coded as missing level for the purpose of the analyses. We also merged data from the Economic Research Service and the United States Department of Agriculture with rural–urban continuum codes. These data contain an indicator of the most urban to the most rural (scale of 1–9) counties in the United States. We merged zip codes within counties and based on sample size converted the existing codes to four levels with sufficient event rates to estimate the association of COVID‐19 mortality. We also used data available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and US Census to assess the relative proportion of COVID‐related deaths in the kidney transplant candidate population with the general population. , Specifically, we calculated the relative proportion of deaths by age (limited to 18–74), race/ethnicity, and gender in the general population and compared these with the candidate population. Of note, the mortality data in the general population were only available over a broader time period (through February 27, 2021) and the distribution of race/ethnicity and gender was for all ages rather than limited to the 18–74‐year‐old population. All analyses were conducted in SAS (v.9.4) and two‐sided type‐I error probabilities of 0.05 were considered for statistical significance.

RESULTS

There were 131 659 candidates on the kidney transplant or kidney/pancreas waiting list between March 1, 2020 and December 1, 2020. This included 28 065 patients newly listed during the study period and other prevalent candidates on the list as of March 1, 2020. The mean age at the time of listing or March 1, 2020 was 53.9 years (s.d. = 12.9). Candidates were 37% White, 31% Black, and 20% Hispanic. Sixty‐two percent were male and the most common primary diagnosis was diabetes (38%). Patients with a prior transplant comprised 12% of the population and 43% had Medicare as primary insurance. Over the study period, there were 3534 all‐cause deaths (2.7% of the study population) and 384 denoted a COVID‐19 cause (0.29% of the study population). The COVID‐19 crude mortality rate was 5.00 per 1000 person years of follow‐up. The proportion of patients with COVID‐19 mortality varied significantly by patient characteristics (Table 1). Increasing age, non‐Whites, males, candidates with higher body mass indices, candidates with diabetes as primary diagnosis, peripheral vascular disease, Medicaid primary insurance, lower educational attainment, and residing in higher distressed communities had higher proportion of COVID‐19 deaths. Patients placed on the waiting list after March 1, 2020 had lower COVID‐19 mortality rates (3.31/1000 patient years) relative to prevalent patients (5.22/1000 patient years, p < .01). These associations were largely consistent considering COVID‐19 deaths as a proportion of all‐cause deaths (Table 1). COVID‐19 deaths comprised 10.9% of all deaths during the study period and this proportion varied significantly by patient characteristics.
TABLE 1

Transplant candidate characteristics and COVID‐19‐related mortality

Candidate characteristicsLevelN% COVID‐19 deaths p‐valuea All‐cause deaths% of Deaths that were COVID p‐value
Age18–3411 7650.08%<.0011158.7%.006
35–4931 3320.14%5617.7%
50–6456 1540.36%158612.7%
65+32 4080.40%127210.2%
Race/EthnicityWhite49 7190.14%<.00113425.1%<.001
Black41 1050.33%112512.0%
Hispanic26 3680.49%73217.8%
Other14 4670.35%33515.2%
GenderFemale50 1370.23%.00112519.2%.02
Male81 5220.33%228311.8%
Body mass index (kg/m2)13–2046670.11%<.0011333.8%<.001
21–2527 4350.17%6787.1%
26–3042 7010.30%112811.2%
31–3535 1540.37%94813.7%
36+20 7080.34%61711.4%
Missing9910.50%3016.7%
Primary diagnosisGN23 6430.15%<.0013739.7%.046
Diabetes50 2940.46%192112.0%
PKD89150.21%14013.6%
Hypertension26 0270.23%60410.1%
Other22 7800.17%4967.7%
Prior transplantNo116 2080.29%.87310010.9%.98
Yes154510.30%43410.8%
Prior malignanciesNo121 0500.29%.57321911.0%.32
Yes10 6090.27%3159.2%
Peripheral vascular diseaseNo119 7190.27%<.001304210.5%.10
Yes11 9400.54%49213.0%
Primary insurancePrivate56 7830.22%<.001125610.1%<.001
Medicaid13 2850.48%37217.2%
Medicare56 1460.33%182610.2%
Other54450.11%807.5%
Pre‐listing dialysis timePreemptive51 6580.24%.006108611.4%.38
1–12 months32 7160.27%9519.2%
13–24 months22 6500.36%72511.2%
25–36 months10 5840.38%33312.0%
37+ months14 0510.37%43911.9%
Educational attainmentHigh school or Less56 2660.41%<.001167413.6%<.001
Some college59 2840.21%14698.4%
Post‐graduate10 5150.18%2677.1%
Unknown55940.23%12410.5%
Working for incomeNo or unknown83 8790.32%.010264410.2%.02
Yes47 7800.24%89012.9%
Blood typeA37 6550.28%.6997610.8%.74
B21 2690.28%52911.3%
AB36190.39%10014.0%
O69 1160.30%192910.6%
Residential distress index quintile1 (Least distressed)19 4120.18%<.0014258.2%.001
215 8450.36%44812.7%
315 9410.33%46711.4%
416 5580.36%48712.1%
5 (Most distressed)20 9120.45%66214.2%
Missing42 9910.20%10458.2%
Urban–rural continuum codea 1 (Most urban)54 0820.40%<.001147814.6%<.001
216 6440.19%4447.0%
396360.24%3007.7%
4 (Most rural)83060.34%26710.5%
Missing42 9910.20%10458.2%
Overall131 6590.29%353410.9%

Abbreviations: GN, glomerulonephritis; PKD, polycystic kidney disease.

Original urban–rural continuum categories collapsed to maintain sufficient sample sizes; categories displayed are metropolitan area (population >1 million), metropolitan (population 250 000 ≤ 1 million), urban counties with >20 000 population, and metropolitan areas with <250 000 population and non‐metropolitan counties to rural communities.

Transplant candidate characteristics and COVID‐19‐related mortality Abbreviations: GN, glomerulonephritis; PKD, polycystic kidney disease. Original urban–rural continuum categories collapsed to maintain sufficient sample sizes; categories displayed are metropolitan area (population >1 million), metropolitan (population 250 000 ≤ 1 million), urban counties with >20 000 population, and metropolitan areas with <250 000 population and non‐metropolitan counties to rural communities. The rate of COVID‐19 mortality was significantly higher for non‐White candidates and increasing age (p‐values <.01). The increased rates by race/ethnic group were consistent in each age group with the highest mortality rates among Hispanics (Figure 1). The COVID‐19 mortality rate in men was 5.67/1000 patient years versus 3.93/1000 patient years in women. These rates also varied by primary diagnosis with the highest rates among diabetics (7.74/1000 patient years). Rates by primary diagnosis group and gender are displayed in Figure 2. Higher rates of COVID‐19 deaths among men were present among candidates with glomerulonephritis and diabetes as primary diagnosis but not polycystic disease or hypertension. COVID‐19 mortality rates varied significantly by candidate's primary insurance, educational attainment, and residential distress index. Figure 3 displays COVID‐19 mortality rates for race/ethnic groups by insurance and education attainment. Candidates with non‐private insurance had higher COVID‐19 mortality in each race/ethnic group. COVID‐19 mortality rates were also higher among patients with lower educational attainment in each race/ethnic group. In addition, for both Blacks and Hispanics, COVID‐19 mortality rates increased associated with increasing distress index (Figure 4). However, COVID‐19 mortality did not increase among Whites by residential distress index. There was also a modest “U‐shaped” pattern of COVID‐19 mortality by rural–urban designation. Patients in the most urban counties (>1 million population) and rural counties had the highest COVID‐19 mortality rates relative to candidates in mid‐size residential communities. However, this pattern appeared to vary by race/ethnic group (Figure 5). In addition, there was significant variation of COVID‐19 mortality rates by UNOS region. As displayed in Figure 6, COVID‐19 mortality rates were highest in region 9, and non‐Whites generally had higher rates in each region.
FIGURE 1

Rate of COVID‐19 mortality by race/ethnicity and age. *Candidate age on March 1, 2020 or the date of listing if after March 1, 2020. “Other” race/ethnic group not displayed [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

FIGURE 2

Rate of COVID‐19 mortality by gender and primary diagnosis. * “Other” primary diagnosis not displayed [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

FIGURE 3

Rate of COVID‐19 mortality by race/ethnicity, primary insurance, and educational attainment. * “Other” race/ethnicity, “other” insurance, and missing distress index not displayed [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

FIGURE 4

Rate of COVID‐19 mortality by race/ethnicity and residential distress index. *Other race and missing residential distress index not shown [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

FIGURE 5

Rate of COVID‐19 mortality by race/ethnicity and urban–rural residential continuum. *Other race not shown; original urban–rural continuum categories collapsed to maintain sufficient sample sizes; categories displayed are metropolitan area (population >1 million), metropolitan (population 250 000 ≤ 1 million), urban counties with >20 000 population, and metropolitan areas with <250 000 population and non‐metropolitan counties to rural communities. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

FIGURE 6

Rate of COVID‐19 mortality by UNOS region and race/ethnic groups. Race/ethnic groups consolidated to White and non‐White (which include Hispanic ethnicity) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Rate of COVID‐19 mortality by race/ethnicity and age. *Candidate age on March 1, 2020 or the date of listing if after March 1, 2020. “Other” race/ethnic group not displayed [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] Rate of COVID‐19 mortality by gender and primary diagnosis. * “Other” primary diagnosis not displayed [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] Rate of COVID‐19 mortality by race/ethnicity, primary insurance, and educational attainment. * “Other” race/ethnicity, “other” insurance, and missing distress index not displayed [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] Rate of COVID‐19 mortality by race/ethnicity and residential distress index. *Other race and missing residential distress index not shown [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] Rate of COVID‐19 mortality by race/ethnicity and urban–rural residential continuum. *Other race not shown; original urban–rural continuum categories collapsed to maintain sufficient sample sizes; categories displayed are metropolitan area (population >1 million), metropolitan (population 250 000 ≤ 1 million), urban counties with >20 000 population, and metropolitan areas with <250 000 population and non‐metropolitan counties to rural communities. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] Rate of COVID‐19 mortality by UNOS region and race/ethnic groups. Race/ethnic groups consolidated to White and non‐White (which include Hispanic ethnicity) [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] The multivariate incident rate ratios for COVID‐19 mortality are displayed in Table 2. After adjustment for candidate characteristics, age, gender, race/ethnicity, body mass index, primary diagnosis, primary insurance, educational attainment, urban–rural location, and residential distress index were associated with adjusted COVID‐19 mortality rates. Notably, Blacks had a 1.96 IRR (95% C.I. 1.43–2.69) and Hispanics had a 3.38 IRR (95% C.I. 2.46–4.66) relative to Whites. Patients with Medicaid had a 1.73 IRR (95% C.I. 1.26–2.39) relative to patients with private insurance. In addition, patients living in the most distressed residential neighborhoods (Q5) had an IRR of 1.93 (95% C.I. 1.28–2.90) relative to patients living in the least distressed neighborhoods.
TABLE 2

Multivariable incident rate ratios of COVID‐19 death

Candidate characteristicsLevelIRR95% C.I.
Age (reference: 18–34)35–491.340.67–2.70
50–643.821.99–7.31
65+4.902.52–9.53
Race/Ethnicity (reference: White)Black1.961.43–2.69
Hispanic3.382.46–4.66
Other2.821.92–4.14
Gender (reference: female)Male1.451.16–1.81
Body mass index (reference: 21–25 kg/m2)13–20 kg/m2 0.830.33–2.09
26–30 kg/m2 1.651.18–2.30
31–35 kg/m2 2.051.47–2.88
36+ kg/m2 1.921.32–2.80
Missing2.921.16–7.36
Primary diagnosis (reference: GN)Diabetes2.071.43–3.00
PKD1.370.78–2.40
Hypertension1.010.66–1.54
Other1.070.67–1.69
Prior transplant (reference: no)Yes1.471.06–2.02
Prior malignancies (reference: no)Yes0.900.61–1.33
Peripheral vascular disease (reference: no)Yes1.150.87–1.52
Primary insurance (reference: private)Medicaid1.731.26–2.39
Medicare1.170.91–1.50
Other0.390.17–0.89
Pre‐listing dialysis time (reference: preemptive)1–12 months0.960.72–1.27
13–24 months1.160.87–1.55
25–36 months1.070.74–1.54
37+ months1.120.80–1.58
Educational attainment (reference: post‐graduate)High school or less1.931.19–3.12
Some college1.260.78–2.05
Unknown1.410.68–2.88
Working for income (reference: no or unknown)Yes1.150.90–1.46
Blood type (reference: A)B0.850.62–1.18
AB1.170.67–2.06
O1.070.85–1.36
Residential distress index quintile (reference: 1 = lowest risk)21.771.16–2.70
31.500.97–2.31
41.500.97–2.30
5 (highest risk)1.931.28–2.90
Missing3.280.44–24.4
Urban‐rural continuum code (metropolitan [population 250 000 ≤ 1 million])Metro (>1 million pop.)2.251.53–3.28
Urban (<250,000 pop. / non‐metro)1.400.81–2.40
Small Urban/Rural2.051.21–3.45

Note: Residential distress index and urban–rural continuum based on zip code of primary residence.

Abbreviations: GN, glomerulonephritis; PKD, polycystic kidney disease.

Multivariable incident rate ratios of COVID‐19 death Note: Residential distress index and urban–rural continuum based on zip code of primary residence. Abbreviations: GN, glomerulonephritis; PKD, polycystic kidney disease. The distribution of the general population and COVID‐19 deaths in the general population and the kidney transplant candidate population is displayed in Figure 7. In the general population, there were slightly more deaths among Whites and Blacks as compared to the distribution of individuals in the population. In contrast, there were fewer deaths among Hispanics than the proportion of individuals in the population. There was a substantially higher proportion of deaths with increasing age than the distribution of the population and a higher number of deaths among males. In contrast, among the candidate population, there was a lower relative COVID‐19 mortality proportion among Whites and a higher proportion of deaths among Hispanics relative to the distribution in the population. Increasing age was also associated with increased COVID‐19 mortality but not as elevated in older groups as in the general population. Males had a higher relative proportion of deaths which was also evident in the general population.
FIGURE 7

Distribution of COVID‐19 mortality in the general population and kidney transplant candidate population by demographic characteristics. Deaths in the general population derived from CDC data through (February 27, 2021) and population demographic characteristics from the US Census (2019). Mortality in the general population by race/ethnicity and gender reflects all available death data; mortality by age only displayed between ages 18–74 for comparison to the transplant candidate population [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Distribution of COVID‐19 mortality in the general population and kidney transplant candidate population by demographic characteristics. Deaths in the general population derived from CDC data through (February 27, 2021) and population demographic characteristics from the US Census (2019). Mortality in the general population by race/ethnicity and gender reflects all available death data; mortality by age only displayed between ages 18–74 for comparison to the transplant candidate population [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

DISCUSSION

The primary findings of the study indicate that in the first 9 months of the pandemic, there were a significant number of deaths attributed to COVID‐19 among kidney transplant candidates. Approximately 11% of all deaths among candidates were coded with COVID‐19 cause of death. COVID‐19 mortality rates were highly variable within the candidate population based on patients’ demographic characteristics, clinical, and social conditions. Increased age, males, higher body mass index and diabetic status, and rates were significantly associated with higher COVID‐19 mortality rates. In addition, COVID‐19 mortality rates were higher among candidates with public insurance, lower educational attainment, and residing in highest quintile distressed communities. Cumulatively, these results affirm that the risks of COVID‐19 mortality are related to a complex combination of demographic, clinical, and social factors, and efforts to attenuate risk and improve care in this population should incorporate both medical and social conditions of patients. There is substantial evidence to date regarding factors associated with mortality associated with COVID‐19 in the general population. Factors associated with COVID‐19 mortality include increasing age, higher body mass index, and various comorbid conditions. , , , These characteristics are highly represented in the kidney transplant candidate population and render patients particularly vulnerable to the impact of COVID‐19. In addition, the risks for patients treated with maintenance dialysis are particularly elevated related to both health status and frequent need for interaction with health‐care providers and patients. , , , , This study provided evidence that many of the risk factors in the general and dialysis populations are salient in the transplant candidate population in the United States. Among transplant candidates, increasing age, male gender, diabetes as primary diagnosis, and obesity are risk factors for COVID‐19 mortality. Interestingly, duration of dialysis nor blood type was associated with increased COVID‐19 causes of death relative to all other deaths despite some reports to the contrary. , , Type of dialysis was unknown for the majority of the current study population, but the impact of patients who are treated with in‐center hemodialysis versus other forms of maintenance dialysis is important to understand in future studies. Results of this study indicated substantially increased rates of COVID‐19 mortality among Blacks and Hispanics. These were disproportionate with rates of all‐cause mortality among candidates and suggest particular susceptibility to transmission and/or severity of COVID‐19 in these populations. The increased rate among Blacks and Hispanics was consistent by age group, insurance type, educational attainment, and residential location. Certainly, these results are concerning in a context in which health disparities by race/ethnic group have been longstanding and suggest additional barriers to transplantation related to higher prevalence of COVID‐19. , , , These disparities were also evident for patients based on indicators of social determinants of health including residential income and location, insurance, and education. Interestingly, the effects of residential distress were evident among Blacks and Hispanics but not Whites. These results may suggest a synergistic association of race and disadvantaged residential communities. Certainly, the association of race/ethnicity with increased mortality may have multiple etiologies, and understanding the specific mechanisms and nuanced etiologies of these associations is critical for prospective investigations. Further understanding the degree to which results are based on the prevalence of COVID‐19 in the respective groups, the health consequences from COVID‐19, and the impact of access and quality of care is critically important. COVID‐19 mortality rates also varied by urban–rural location of candidates. The effects of COVID‐19 were largely centered in urban areas initially but transitioned to rural communities. Findings highlight the important observation that social risks are critically important to address with the impact of COVID‐19 and the need to develop interventions for modifiable factors. , , Without question, the COVID‐19 pandemic has affected all aspects of the transplantation process including donor procurement, living donor transplantation, and care and management of transplant candidates and recipients. , , , , For transplant candidates and caregivers, shared decision‐making regarding organ acceptance often accounts for the balance of risks for respective treatment modalities. In this context, transplant candidates, and, in particular, candidates with certain risk factors may have an imperative to access transplantation expeditiously during the pandemic. Management of current transplant candidates should also incorporate the risk profile of patients and consider both clinical as well as social risk factors to enhance care. As compared to the general population, Whites had a lower relative proportion of COVID‐19 deaths and Black and particularly Hispanics had a much higher proportion of deaths among transplant candidates. This suggests that the kidney transplant candidate population may have unique sources of risk, and particular focus on interventions to mitigate risks among the Black and Hispanic candidate populations is needed. Increased age among candidates did not have the same relative mortality distribution as the general population which may in some part reflect selection criteria of older transplant candidates. Overall, results highlight that a multifactorial approach may be needed to guide effective health‐care delivery to transplant candidates including potential prioritization of COVID‐19 vaccine deployment to the most vulnerable groups. There are several limitations of the study that are important to acknowledge and incorporate for inferences about the findings. COVID‐19 death reporting is likely not comprehensive and there may be lagged data that affect the estimation of incidence rates as reported in this study. While missing causes of death may not be systematically different by patient characteristics, the total number of deaths related to COVID‐19 is likely higher and may often be a contributory factor if not listed as primary cause of death. As the UNOS coding for COVID‐19 deaths is based on death as a cause of waitlist removal, deaths after removal that may have been attributed to COVID‐19 are not known. Over the study period, there were 48 total deaths after waitlist removal, some of which may have been attributed to COVID‐19. In addition, as there is no information about COVID‐19 positivity available in these data, mortality rates reflect both vulnerability to contractive COVID‐19 as well as severity of the effects if contracted. These data are retrospective observational data and are subject to residual confounding and associations may be affected by underlying factors. Moreover, as the pandemic evolves, risk factors for susceptibility and the health consequences of COVID‐19 are certain to change. In summary, the study demonstrated significant rates of COVID‐19 mortality among kidney transplant candidates in the United States. COVID‐19 mortality was disproportionally represented in the population and patients who were older, diabetic, higher body mass index, and male were significantly more likely to have a COVID‐19 death during the study period. In addition, social determinants of health including education, insurance, residential distress, geographic location, and racial/ethnic background were strongly associated COVID‐19 mortality. These social factors in conjunction with clinical factors should be strongly considered for risk assessment and care management in the kidney transplant candidate population.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation.
  30 in total

1.  Donor and transplant candidate selection for solid organ transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  N Thao N Galvan; Nicolas F Moreno; Jay E Garza; Susan Bourgeois; Marion Hemmersbach-Miller; Bhamidipati Murthy; Katherine Timmins; Christine A O'Mahony; James Anton; Andrew Civitello; Puneet Garcha; Gabe Loor; Kenneth Liao; Alexis Shaffi; John Vierling; Rise Stribling; Abbas Rana; John A Goss
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Readmission and Death After Initial Hospital Discharge Among Patients With COVID-19 in a Large Multihospital System.

Authors:  John P Donnelly; Xiao Qing Wang; Theodore J Iwashyna; Hallie C Prescott
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Lessons We've Learned - Covid-19 and the Undocumented Latinx Community.

Authors:  Kathleen R Page; Alejandra Flores-Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  An early experience on the effect of solid organ transplant status on hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Vinay Nair; Nicholas Jandovitz; Jamie S Hirsch; Mersema Abate; Sanjaya K Satapathy; Nitzan Roth; Santiago J Miyara; Sara Guevara; Adam M Kressel; Alec Xiang; Grace Wu; Samuel D Butensky; David Lin; Stephanie Williams; Madhu C Bhaskaran; David T Majure; Elliot Grodstein; Lawrence Lau; Gayatri Nair; Ahmed E Fahmy; Aaron Winnick; Nadine Breslin; Ilan Berlinrut; Christine Molmenti; Lance B Becker; Prashant Malhotra; Pranisha Gautam-Goyal; Brian Lima; Simon Maybaum; Samit K Shah; Ryosuke Takegawa; Kei Hayashida; Koichiro Shinozaki; Lewis W Teperman; Ernesto P Molmenti
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  HLA and AB0 Polymorphisms May Influence SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19 Severity.

Authors:  Antonio Amoroso; Paola Magistroni; Francesca Vespasiano; Antonino Bella; Stefania Bellino; Francesca Puoti; Silvia Alizzi; Tiziana Vaisitti; Stefano Boros; Paolo Antonio Grossi; Silvia Trapani; Letizia Lombardini; Patrizio Pezzotti; Silvia Deaglio; Silvio Brusaferro; Massimo Cardillo
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  COVID-19 and APOL1: Understanding Disease Mechanisms through Clinical Observation.

Authors:  David J Friedman
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Early national and center-level changes to kidney transplantation in the United States during the COVID-19 epidemic.

Authors:  Brian J Boyarsky; William A Werbel; Christine M Durand; Robin K Avery; Kyle R Jackson; Amber B Kernodle; Jon Snyder; Ryutaro Hirose; Indraneel M Massie; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Dorry L Segev; Allan B Massie
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 9.369

8.  Organ donation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ola Ahmed; Diane Brockmeier; Kevin Lee; William C Chapman; M B Majella Doyle
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 9.369

9.  COVID-19 outcomes in patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation and kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Rebecca Craig-Schapiro; Thalia Salinas; Michelle Lubetzky; Brittany T Abel; Samuel Sultan; John R Lee; Sandip Kapur; Meredith J Aull; Darshana M Dadhania
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 9.369

10.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients: A cohort study.

Authors:  Zohra S Chaudhry; Jonathan D Williams; Amit Vahia; Raef Fadel; Tommy Parraga Acosta; Rohini Prashar; Pritika Shrivastava; Nadeen Khoury; Julio Pinto Corrales; Celeste Williams; Shunji Nagai; Marwan Abouljoud; Milagros Samaniego-Picota; Odaliz Abreu-Lanfranco; Ramon Del Busto; Mayur S Ramesh; Anita Patel; George J Alangaden
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 9.369

View more
  6 in total

1.  Excess mortality in solid organ transplant recipients hospitalized with COVID-19: A large-scale comparison of SOT recipients hospitalized with or without COVID-19.

Authors:  Karola S Jering; Martina M McGrath; Finnian R Mc Causland; Brian Claggett; Jonathan W Cunningham; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.456

2.  Changing trends in mortality among solid organ transplant recipients hospitalized for COVID-19 during the course of the pandemic.

Authors:  Madeleine R Heldman; Olivia S Kates; Kassem Safa; Camille N Kotton; Sarah J Georgia; Julie M Steinbrink; Barbara D Alexander; Marion Hemmersbach-Miller; Emily A Blumberg; Ashrit Multani; Brandy Haydel; Ricardo M La Hoz; Lisset Moni; Yesabeli Condor; Sandra Flores; Carlos G Munoz; Juan Guitierrez; Esther I Diaz; Daniela Diaz; Rodrigo Vianna; Giselle Guerra; Matthias Loebe; Robert M Rakita; Maricar Malinis; Marwan M Azar; Vagish Hemmige; Margaret E McCort; Zohra S Chaudhry; Pooja P Singh; Kailey Hughes Kramer; Arzu Velioglu; Julie M Yabu; Jose A Morillis; Sapna A Mehta; Sajal D Tanna; Michael G Ison; Ariella C Derenge; David van Duin; Adrienne Maximin; Carlene Gilbert; Jason D Goldman; Erika D Lease; Cynthia E Fisher; Ajit P Limaye
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 9.369

3.  COVID-19-Associated Mortality among Kidney Transplant Recipients and Candidates in the United States.

Authors:  Sumit Mohan; Kristen L King; S Ali Husain; Jesse D Schold
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Evidence-Based Practices to Reduce COVID-19 Transmission in Dialysis Facilities.

Authors:  Alan S Kliger; Renee Garrick
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 10.614

5.  The Tsunami of COVID-19 Infection Among Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Study from Iran.

Authors:  Hormat Rahimzadeh; Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh; Alireza Khajavi; Mohammad Saatchi; Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Fateme Guitynavard; Sanaz Dehghani; Venus Soleimani; Seyed Mohammad Kazem Aghamir
Journal:  J Epidemiol Glob Health       Date:  2021-11-26

6.  Utilization and outcomes of deceased donor SARS-CoV-2-positive organs for solid organ transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Jesse D Schold; Christine E Koval; Alvin Wee; Mohamed Eltemamy; Emilio D Poggio
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 9.369

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.