Ziyao Han1, Yiping Wei1, Cui Wang1, Gang Yang1, Wenjie Hu1, Kwok-Hung Chung2. 1. Department of Periodontology, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the dimensional changes of the keratinized tissue width (KTW) in molar regions after augmentation by free gingival grafts (FGG) before implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In seventeen patients, twenty implant sites in molar regions with KTW ≤3 mm at the buccal aspect received FGG 2 months before implant placement. KTW at the buccal aspect was measured before FGG (T0), immediately before implant placement (T1), at the time of impression taking for final prosthesis fabrication (T2), and at the end of the follow-up period after loading (T3, 12-48 months). Changes in KTW before and after FGG, as well as the alterations during the follow-up period after loading, were analyzed. Shapiro-Wilk test, paired Student's t test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for the data analysis at α = 0.05. RESULTS: KTW at the buccal aspect of the alveolar ridge was observed with a significant gain of 5.9 ± 1.3 mm at T1 (p < .001). The shrinkage of KTW from T2 to T3 was 8.5%, which was limited but statistically significant (p = .008). KTW at the buccal aspect of implant restorations was 5.0 ± 1.5 mm at T3. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, our data suggest that using FGG to increase KTW in molar regions before implant placement had a predictable result. The buccal KTW had a limited reduction and was ≥3 mm with more than 12 months of follow-up after loading.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the dimensional changes of the keratinized tissue width (KTW) in molar regions after augmentation by free gingival grafts (FGG) before implant placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In seventeen patients, twenty implant sites in molar regions with KTW ≤3 mm at the buccal aspect received FGG 2 months before implant placement. KTW at the buccal aspect was measured before FGG (T0), immediately before implant placement (T1), at the time of impression taking for final prosthesis fabrication (T2), and at the end of the follow-up period after loading (T3, 12-48 months). Changes in KTW before and after FGG, as well as the alterations during the follow-up period after loading, were analyzed. Shapiro-Wilk test, paired Student's t test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for the data analysis at α = 0.05. RESULTS: KTW at the buccal aspect of the alveolar ridge was observed with a significant gain of 5.9 ± 1.3 mm at T1 (p < .001). The shrinkage of KTW from T2 to T3 was 8.5%, which was limited but statistically significant (p = .008). KTW at the buccal aspect of implant restorations was 5.0 ± 1.5 mm at T3. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, our data suggest that using FGG to increase KTW in molar regions before implant placement had a predictable result. The buccal KTW had a limited reduction and was ≥3 mm with more than 12 months of follow-up after loading.