Spenser E January1, Jennifer C Hagopian2, Nicole M Nesselhauf2, Kristin Progar2, Timothy A Horwedel3, Rowena Delos Santos4. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, 1 Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, Mailstop 90-52-411, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA. spenser.january@bjc.org. 2. Department of Pharmacy, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, 1 Barnes-Jewish Hospital Plaza, Mailstop 90-52-411, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA. 3. Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Cary, NC, USA. 4. Division of Nephrology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-Tac) prescribing information states that there is insufficient data in older adult patients from which to make recommendations on use in this population. This study sought to provide information on de novo use of LCP-Tac in the older adult kidney transplant population. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study had two distinct objectives; to determine if weight-based doses of LCP-Tac differ based on recipient age and to compare safety and efficacy between LCP-Tac and immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) in older adult transplant recipients. Data was obtained through electronic chart review up to 2 years after transplant with censoring for graft loss and death. RESULTS: Weight-based doses were compared between patients aged ≥ 65 years (n = 84), 36-64 years (n = 64), and ≤35 years (n = 44). LCP-Tac weight-based doses were lower at all time points in patients ≥ 65 years of age. Both age and race significantly impacted required dose on linear regression. The doses required to achieve therapeutic tacrolimus troughs were significantly lower in all age groups compared with the current FDA de novo dosing recommendation. In the older adult population, graft outcomes and infectious and metabolic complications were compared between recipients of LCP-Tac (n = 84) and IR-Tac (n = 42). Within this cohort, there were no differences between LCP-Tac and IR-Tac on graft function, rejection, graft loss, death, cytomegalovirus viremia, BK viremia, hypertension, diabetes, alopecia, or tremor up to 2 years after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Older adult recipients required significantly lower LCP-Tac doses compared with younger recipients and with the FDA-labeled starting dose. There were no differences in graft outcomes or adverse effects in older adult patients who received LCP-Tac versus IR-Tac.
BACKGROUND: Extended-release tacrolimus (LCP-Tac) prescribing information states that there is insufficient data in older adult patients from which to make recommendations on use in this population. This study sought to provide information on de novo use of LCP-Tac in the older adult kidney transplant population. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study had two distinct objectives; to determine if weight-based doses of LCP-Tac differ based on recipient age and to compare safety and efficacy between LCP-Tac and immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) in older adult transplant recipients. Data was obtained through electronic chart review up to 2 years after transplant with censoring for graft loss and death. RESULTS: Weight-based doses were compared between patients aged ≥ 65 years (n = 84), 36-64 years (n = 64), and ≤35 years (n = 44). LCP-Tac weight-based doses were lower at all time points in patients ≥ 65 years of age. Both age and race significantly impacted required dose on linear regression. The doses required to achieve therapeutic tacrolimus troughs were significantly lower in all age groups compared with the current FDA de novo dosing recommendation. In the older adult population, graft outcomes and infectious and metabolic complications were compared between recipients of LCP-Tac (n = 84) and IR-Tac (n = 42). Within this cohort, there were no differences between LCP-Tac and IR-Tac on graft function, rejection, graft loss, death, cytomegalovirus viremia, BK viremia, hypertension, diabetes, alopecia, or tremor up to 2 years after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Older adult recipients required significantly lower LCP-Tac doses compared with younger recipients and with the FDA-labeled starting dose. There were no differences in graft outcomes or adverse effects in older adult patients who received LCP-Tac versus IR-Tac.
Authors: Vânia Vilas-Boas; Renata Silva; A Rita Gaio; Ana Margarida Martins; Sofia Costa Lima; Anabela Cordeiro-da-Silva; Maria de Lourdes Bastos; Fernando Remião Journal: Cytometry A Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 4.355
Authors: Jiang-Tao Tang; Brenda C de Winter; Dennis A Hesselink; Ferdi Sombogaard; Lan-Lan Wang; Teun van Gelder Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Emilio Rodrigo; David San Segundo; Gema Fernández-Fresnedo; Marcos López-Hoyos; Adalberto Benito; Juan Carlos Ruiz; Maria-Angeles de Cos; Manuel Arias Journal: Transplantation Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 4.939