Literature DB >> 33755925

Robotic-assisted harvest of latissimus dorsi muscle flap for breast reconstruction: review of the literature.

Spyridon A Vourtsis1, Anna Paspala2,3,4, Panagis M Lykoudis5,6, Eleftherios Spartalis7, Gerasimos Tsourouflis8,7, Dimitrios Dimitroulis8,7, Emmanouil Pikoulis5, Nikolaos Nikiteas8,7,9.   

Abstract

Robotic-assisted surgery continues to gain ground over conventional surgical methods, due to reported better results regarding the aesthetic outcome and the decreased percentage of complications. Although latissimus dorsi flap harvesting for breast reconstruction has been already used for several years, a plethora of serious complications has been reported. Recently, minimally invasive surgical approaches, such as robotic-assisted technique, have been suggested with conflicting outcomes to overcome technical difficulties. Therefore, the literature review was conducted regarding robotic-assisted harvesting of the latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction. A narrative review of the contemporary literature was performed in the PubMed database for the use of robotic-assisted surgery of latissimus dorsi muscle flap harvesting for breast reconstruction. Appropriate search terms were used, and specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Five studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 32 cases of robotically assisted harvesting of pedicled latissimus dorsi muscle flap for implant-based breast reconstruction have been identified. All flaps were successfully harvested without converting in the traditional open procedure. There were no significant postoperative complications, expect from few cases of postoperative seromas, which were conservatively managed. Additionally, all patients were satisfied with their postoperative cosmetic outcome. The robotic-assisted harvesting technique of the latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction is safe and comparable to the conventional methods. Reduced hospital stays and superior aesthetic outcome are the main advantages, while total cost and the difficulty of reaching the learning curve plateau are the main concerns regarding this modern and minimally invasive surgical approach.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast; Harvesting; Latissimus dorsi; Reconstruction; Robotic

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33755925     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01232-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  14 in total

1.  Robotic latissimus dorsi muscle harvest: a case series.

Authors:  Jesse C Selber; Donald P Baumann; F Chistopher Holsinger
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Robotic mitral surgery: current and future roles.

Authors:  Curtis A Anderson; Alan P Kypson; W Randolph Chitwood
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Robotic-assisted Transperitoneal Infrarenal Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Gynecological Malignancies: Comparison with a Laparoscopic Approach.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Lee; Yoon Hee Lee; Gun Oh Chong; Dae Gy Hong; Yoon Soon Lee
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 4.  Robotic surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Terashima; Masanori Tokunaga; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taaichi Kawamura; Yuichiro Miki; Rie Makuuchi; Shinsaku Honda; Taichi Tatsubayashi; Wataru Takagi; Hayato Omori; Fumiko Hirata
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Can I Make Robotic Surgery Make Sense in My Practice?

Authors:  Jesse C Selber
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  The ongoing emergence of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  S Struk; Q Qassemyar; N Leymarie; J-F Honart; H Alkhashnam; K De Fremicourt; A Conversano; J-B Schaff; F Rimareix; F Kolb; B Sarfati
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 0.660

7.  Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy in women with high grade endometrial cancer: a multi-site study performed at high volume cancer centers.

Authors:  Amanda Nickles Fader; Leigh G Seamon; Pedro F Escobar; Heidi E Frasure; Laura A Havrilesky; Kristine M Zanotti; Angeles Alvarez Secord; John F Boggess; David E Cohn; Jeffrey M Fowler; Gregory Skafianos; Emma Rossi; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  A systematic review of PFE pre-prostatectomy.

Authors:  S S Goonewardene; D Gillatt; R Persad
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-03-21

9.  Robotic-assisted latissimus dorsi harvest in delayed-immediate breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark W Clemens; Steven Kronowitz; Jesse C Selber
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.314

10.  Robotic-assisted oropharyngeal reconstruction.

Authors:  Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Steven C Bonawitz; Seungwon Kim
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-11-30
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Breast Reconstruction: Necessity for Further Standardization of the Current Surgical Techniques Attempting to Facilitate Scientific Evaluation and Select Tailored Individualized Procedures Optimizing Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Ekaterini Christina Tampaki; Athanasios Tampakis
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 2.860

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.