Markus Gorfer1, Mathias Mayer2,3, Harald Berger4, Boris Rewald5, Claudia Tallian1, Bradley Matthews2,6, Hans Sandén2, Klaus Katzensteiner2, Douglas L Godbold2. 1. Bioresources Unit, Center for Health & Bioresources, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Vienna, Austria. 2. Forest Ecology, Dept. of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190, Vienna, Austria. 3. Forest Soils and Biogeochemistry, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland. 4. Symbiocyte, Vienna, Austria. 5. Forest Ecology, Dept. of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190, Vienna, Austria. boris.rewald@boku.ac.at. 6. Environment Agency Austria, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
Forests on steep slopes constitute a significant proportion of European mountain areas and are important as production and protection forests. This study describes the soil fungal community structure in a European beech-dominated mountain forest stands in the Northern Calcareous Alps and investigates how it is determined by season and soil properties. Samples were collected at high spatial resolution in an area of ca. 100 m × 700 m in May (spring) and August (summer). Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing of the ITS2-region revealed distinct patterns for the soil fungal communities. In contrast to other studies from temperate European beech forest stands, Ascomycota dominated the highly diverse fungal community, while ectomycorrhizal fungi were of lower abundance. Russulaceae, which are often among the dominant ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with European beech, were absent from all samples. Potentially plant pathogenic fungi were more prevalent than previously reported. Only subtle seasonal differences were found between fungal communities in spring and summer. Especially, dominant saprotrophic taxa were largely unaffected by season, while slightly stronger effects were observed for ectomycorrhizal fungi. Soil characteristics like pH and organic carbon content, on the other hand, strongly shaped abundant taxa among the saprotrophic fungal community.
Forests on steep slopes constitute a significant proportion of class="Species">European mountain areas and are imclass="Chemical">portant as class="Chemical">production and class="Chemical">protection forests. This study describes the soil fungal community structure in a class="Chemical">pan class="Species">European beech-dominated mountain forest stands in the Northern Calcareous Alps and investigates how it is determined by season and soil properties. Samples were collected at high spatial resolution in an area of ca. 100 m × 700 m in May (spring) and August (summer). Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing of the ITS2-region revealed distinct patterns for the soil fungal communities. In contrast to other studies from temperate European beech forest stands, Ascomycota dominated the highly diverse fungal community, while ectomycorrhizal fungi were of lower abundance. Russulaceae, which are often among the dominant ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with European beech, were absent from all samples. Potentially plant pathogenic fungi were more prevalent than previously reported. Only subtle seasonal differences were found between fungal communities in spring and summer. Especially, dominant saprotrophic taxa were largely unaffected by season, while slightly stronger effects were observed for ectomycorrhizal fungi. Soil characteristics like pH and organic carbon content, on the other hand, strongly shaped abundant taxa among the saprotrophic fungal community.
Authors: Erica Sterkenburg; Adam Bahr; Mikael Brandström Durling; Karina E Clemmensen; Björn D Lindahl Journal: New Phytol Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 10.151
Authors: Leho Tedersoo; Mohammad Bahram; Sergei Põlme; Urmas Kõljalg; Nourou S Yorou; Ravi Wijesundera; Luis Villarreal Ruiz; Aída M Vasco-Palacios; Pham Quang Thu; Ave Suija; Matthew E Smith; Cathy Sharp; Erki Saluveer; Alessandro Saitta; Miguel Rosas; Taavi Riit; David Ratkowsky; Karin Pritsch; Kadri Põldmaa; Meike Piepenbring; Cherdchai Phosri; Marko Peterson; Kaarin Parts; Kadri Pärtel; Eveli Otsing; Eduardo Nouhra; André L Njouonkou; R Henrik Nilsson; Luis N Morgado; Jordan Mayor; Tom W May; Luiza Majuakim; D Jean Lodge; Su See Lee; Karl-Henrik Larsson; Petr Kohout; Kentaro Hosaka; Indrek Hiiesalu; Terry W Henkel; Helery Harend; Liang-dong Guo; Alina Greslebin; Gwen Grelet; Jozsef Geml; Genevieve Gates; William Dunstan; Chris Dunk; Rein Drenkhan; John Dearnaley; André De Kesel; Tan Dang; Xin Chen; Franz Buegger; Francis Q Brearley; Gregory Bonito; Sten Anslan; Sandra Abell; Kessy Abarenkov Journal: Science Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Rodica Pena; Christine Offermann; Judy Simon; Pascale Sarah Naumann; Arthur Gessler; Jutta Holst; Michael Dannenmann; Helmut Mayer; Ingrid Kögel-Knabner; Heinz Rennenberg; Andrea Polle Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2010-01-22 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Mathias Mayer; Boris Rewald; Bradley Matthews; Hans Sandén; Christoph Rosinger; Klaus Katzensteiner; Markus Gorfer; Harald Berger; Claudia Tallian; Torsten W Berger; Douglas L Godbold Journal: New Phytol Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 10.151