David M Walton1, James M Elliott2, Joshua Lee1, Mohamad Fakhereddin1, Wonjin Seo1. 1. School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Canada. 2. Northern Sydney Local Health District & Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS) is a 12-item self-report tool intended for prognostic risk phenotyping in people with acute musculoskeletal (MSK) trauma. The initial validation study showed good associations with outcomes 12 weeks later in a cohort of 72 acutely injured patients from one region in Canada. This study aims to provide further clinical utility through identification of meaningful cut scores in a larger, mixed geography sample, and expands the prediction window from 12 to 52 weeks. METHODS: Data were drawn from databanks in London, Canada and Chicago, United States. Participants were recruited within 3 weeks of non-catastrophic MSK trauma and followed for 12 months. Using outcomes trajectories, the TIDS underwent linear regression-based analysis to predict 52-week outcomes, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves to identify discriminative accuracy and meaningful cut scores. RESULTS: N = 224 participants with acute trauma were followed and both %Interference and Pain Severity were captured at intake and 3 follow-ups to establish curvilinear recovery trajectories. The TIDS explained significant variance in both the interference and severity outcomes after controlling for sex, region of injury, and baseline scores. ROC analysis revealed significant discriminative accuracy for predicting both the trajectories and the distal outcomes over 52 weeks. The TIDS was more accurate for identifying the low-risk than high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: The TIDS is a useful tool for 'ruling out' high risk of poor outcome in a mixed sample of participants from two different countries. IMPACT STATEMENT: The TIDS will be a useful tool for clinicians to predict the rate of recovery by displaying meaningful cut-scores for their patients after an acute musculoskeletal injury. This could lead to reduced burden of care for low risk patients and more informed treatment options for higher risk patients.
OBJECTIVE: The Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS) is a 12-item self-report tool intended for prognostic risk phenotyping in people with acute musculoskeletal (MSK) trauma. The initial validation study showed good associations with outcomes 12 weeks later in a cohort of 72 acutely injured patients from one region in Canada. This study aims to provide further clinical utility through identification of meaningful cut scores in a larger, mixed geography sample, and expands the prediction window from 12 to 52 weeks. METHODS: Data were drawn from databanks in London, Canada and Chicago, United States. Participants were recruited within 3 weeks of non-catastrophic MSK trauma and followed for 12 months. Using outcomes trajectories, the TIDS underwent linear regression-based analysis to predict 52-week outcomes, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves to identify discriminative accuracy and meaningful cut scores. RESULTS: N = 224 participants with acute trauma were followed and both %Interference and Pain Severity were captured at intake and 3 follow-ups to establish curvilinear recovery trajectories. The TIDS explained significant variance in both the interference and severity outcomes after controlling for sex, region of injury, and baseline scores. ROC analysis revealed significant discriminative accuracy for predicting both the trajectories and the distal outcomes over 52 weeks. The TIDS was more accurate for identifying the low-risk than high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: The TIDS is a useful tool for 'ruling out' high risk of poor outcome in a mixed sample of participants from two different countries. IMPACT STATEMENT: The TIDS will be a useful tool for clinicians to predict the rate of recovery by displaying meaningful cut-scores for their patients after an acute musculoskeletal injury. This could lead to reduced burden of care for low risk patients and more informed treatment options for higher risk patients.
Authors: Joy C MacDermid; David M Walton; Sarah Avery; Alanna Blanchard; Evelyn Etruw; Cheryl McAlpine; Charlie H Goldsmith Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Guus Panken; Trynke Hoekstra; Arianne Verhagen; Maurits van Tulder; Jos Twisk; Martijn W Heymans Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Linda J Carroll; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Gabrielle van der Velde; Scott Haldeman; Lena W Holm; Eugene J Carragee; Eric L Hurwitz; Pierre Côté; Margareta Nordin; Paul M Peloso; Jaime Guzman; J David Cassidy Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Jonathan C Hill; David G T Whitehurst; Martyn Lewis; Stirling Bryan; Kate M Dunn; Nadine E Foster; Kika Konstantinou; Chris J Main; Elizabeth Mason; Simon Somerville; Gail Sowden; Kanchan Vohora; Elaine M Hay Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Shirin Modarresi; Joy C MacDermid; Nina Suh; James M Elliott; David M Walton Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 4.755