Literature DB >> 33755088

Low-pressure versus standard pressure laparoscopic colorectal surgery (PAROS trial): a phase III randomized controlled trial.

S Celarier1, S Monziols2, B Célérier1, V Assenat1, P Carles2, G Napolitano2, M Laclau-Lacrouts1, E Rullier1, A Ouattara2,3, Q Denost1.   

Abstract

TRIAL
DESIGN: This is a phase III, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.
METHODS: In this trial, patients with laparoscopic colectomy were assigned to either low pressure (LP: 7 mmHg) or standard pressure (SP: 12 mmHg) at a ratio of 1 : 1. The aim of this trial was to assess the impact of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colectomy on postoperative recovery. The primary endpoint was the duration of hospital stay. The main secondary endpoints were postoperative pain, consumption of analgesics and postoperative morbidity.
RESULTS: Some 138 patients were enrolled, of whom 11 were excluded and 127 were analysed: 62 with LP and 65 with SP. Duration of hospital stay (3 versus 4 days; P = 0.010), visual analog scale (0.5 versus 2.0; P = 0.008) and analgesic consumption (level II: 73 versus 88 per cent; P = 0.032; level III: 10 versus 23 per cent; P = 0.042) were lower with LP. Morbidity was not significantly different between the two groups (10 versus 17 per cent; P = 0.231).
CONCLUSION: Using low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colonic resection improves postoperative recovery, shortening the duration of hospitalization and decreasing postoperative pain and analgesic consumption. This suggests that low pressure should become the standard of care for laparoscopic colectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03813797.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33755088     DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   11.122


  3 in total

1.  Impact of intra-abdominal insufflation pressure on gas leakage occurring during laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jeffrey Dalli; Tess Montminy; Makenzie Ferguson; Mohammad Faraz Khan; Kevin Nolan; Ronan A Cahill
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  A novel method for monitoring abdominal compliance to optimize insufflation pressure during laparoscopy.

Authors:  Frank Sterke; Willem van Weteringen; Lorenzo Ventura; Ilaria Milesi; René M H Wijnen; John Vlot; Raffaele L Dellacà
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 3.  Robotic surgery in emergency setting: 2021 WSES position paper.

Authors:  Nicola de'Angelis; Jim Khan; Francesco Marchegiani; Giorgio Bianchi; Filippo Aisoni; Daniele Alberti; Luca Ansaloni; Walter Biffl; Osvaldo Chiara; Graziano Ceccarelli; Federico Coccolini; Enrico Cicuttin; Mathieu D'Hondt; Salomone Di Saverio; Michele Diana; Belinda De Simone; Eloy Espin-Basany; Stefan Fichtner-Feigl; Jeffry Kashuk; Ewout Kouwenhoven; Ari Leppaniemi; Nassiba Beghdadi; Riccardo Memeo; Marco Milone; Ernest Moore; Andrew Peitzmann; Patrick Pessaux; Manos Pikoulis; Michele Pisano; Frederic Ris; Massimo Sartelli; Giuseppe Spinoglio; Michael Sugrue; Edward Tan; Paschalis Gavriilidis; Dieter Weber; Yoram Kluger; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.469

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.