| Literature DB >> 33754903 |
Rozina Yasmin Choudhury1, Kamran Basharat1, Syeda Anum Zahra1, Tien Tran1, Lara Rimmer2, Amer Harky3,4, Mohammed Idhrees5, Mohamad Bashir6.
Abstract
Over the decades, the Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) technique has gained immense popularity allowing simplified treatment of complex aortic pathologies. FET is frequently used to treat aortic conditions involving the distal aortic arch and the proximal descending aorta in a single stage. Surgical preference has recently changed from FET procedures being performed at Zone 3 to Zone 2. There are several advantages of Zone 2 FET over Zone 3 FET including reduction in spinal cord injury, visceral ischemia, neurological and cardiovascular sequelae. In addition, Zone 2 FET is a technically less complicated procedure. Literature on the comparison between Zone 3 and Zone 2 FET is scarce and primarily observational and anecdotal. Therefore, further research is warranted in this paradigm to substantiate current surgical treatment options for complex aortic pathologies. In this review, we explore literature surrounding FET and the reasons for the shift in surgical preference from Zone 3 to Zone 2.Entities:
Keywords: aortic arch repair; aortic surgery; frozen elephant trunk; spinal cord ischemia; zone 2; zone 3
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33754903 DOI: 10.1177/15385744211002493
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vasc Endovascular Surg ISSN: 1538-5744 Impact factor: 1.089