Literature DB >> 33754826

Assessing Rectal Cancer Treatment Response Using Coregistered Endorectal Photoacoustic and US Imaging Paired with Deep Learning.

Xiandong Leng1, K M Shihab Uddin1, William Chapman1, Hongbo Luo1, Sitai Kou1, Eghbal Amidi1, Guang Yang1, Deyali Chatterjee1, Anup Shetty1, Steve Hunt1, Matthew Mutch1, Quing Zhu1.   

Abstract

Background Conventional radiologic modalities perform poorly in the radiated rectum and are often unable to differentiate residual cancer from treatment scarring. Purpose To report the development and initial patient study of an imaging system comprising an endorectal coregistered photoacoustic (PA) microscopy (PAM) and US system paired with a convolution neural network (CNN) to assess the rectal cancer treatment response. Materials and Methods In this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04339374), participants completed radiation and chemotherapy from September 2019 to September 2020 and images were obtained with the PAM/US system prior to surgery. Another group's colorectal specimens were studied ex vivo. The PAM/US system consisted of an endorectal imaging probe, a 1064-nm laser, and one US ring transducer. The PAM CNN and US CNN models were trained and validated to distinguish normal from malignant colorectal tissue using ex vivo and in vivo patient data. The PAM CNN and US CNN were then tested using additional in vivo patient data that had not been seen by the CNNs during training and validation. Results Twenty-two patients' ex vivo specimens and five patients' in vivo images (a total of 2693 US regions of interest [ROIs] and 2208 PA ROIs) were used for CNN training and validation. Data from five additional patients were used for testing. A total of 32 participants (mean age, 60 years; range, 35-89 years) were evaluated. Unique PAM imaging markers of the complete tumor response were found, specifically including recovery of normal submucosal vascular architecture within the treated tumor bed. The PAM CNN model captured this recovery process and correctly differentiated these changes from the residual tumor. The imaging system remained highly capable of differentiating tumor from normal tissue, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98, 0.99) for data from five participants. By comparison, the US CNN had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.73). Conclusion An endorectal coregistered photoacoustic microscopy/US system paired with a convolutional neural network model showed high diagnostic performance in assessing the rectal cancer treatment response and demonstrated potential for optimizing posttreatment management. © RSNA, 2021 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Klibanov in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33754826      PMCID: PMC8108559          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021202208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  23 in total

Review 1.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the loco-regional staging of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Marone; Mario de Bellis; Valentina D'Angelo; Paolo Delrio; Valentina Passananti; Elena Di Girolamo; Giovanni Battista Rossi; Daniela Rega; Maura Claire Tracey; Alfonso Mario Tempesta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-25

2.  Diffusion-weighted MRI to assess response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: main interpretation pitfalls and their use for teaching.

Authors:  Doenja M J Lambregts; Miriam M van Heeswijk; Andrea Delli Pizzi; Saskia G C van Elderen; Luisa Andrade; Nicky H G M Peters; Peter A M Kint; Margreet Osinga-de Jong; Shandra Bipat; Rik Ooms; Max J Lahaye; Monique Maas; Geerard L Beets; Frans C H Bakers; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Rectal MRI for Cancer Staging and Surveillance.

Authors:  Courtney C Moreno; Patrick S Sullivan; Pardeep K Mittal
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 4.  Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging from organelles to organs.

Authors:  Lihong V Wang; Song Hu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Can Endorectal Ultrasound, MRI, and Mucosa Integrity Accurately Predict the Complete Response for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiation? A Prospective Observational Study from a Single Medical Center.

Authors:  Sen Liu; Guang-Xi Zhong; Wei-Xun Zhou; Hua-Dan Xue; Wei-Dong Pan; Lai Xu; Jun-Yang Lu; Bin Wu; Guo-le Lin; Hui-Zhong Qiu; Yi Xiao
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to assess tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: can we trust the findings?

Authors:  Carlos Pastor; Jose Carlos Subtil; Jesus Sola; Jorge Baixauli; Carmen Beorlegui; Leire Arbea; Javier Aristu; Jose Luis Hernandez-Lizoain
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Optical-resolution photoacoustic endomicroscopy in vivo.

Authors:  Joon-Mo Yang; Chiye Li; Ruimin Chen; Bin Rao; Junjie Yao; Cheng-Hung Yeh; Amos Danielli; Konstantin Maslov; Qifa Zhou; K Kirk Shung; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Efficacy of high-frequency ultrasound probes for the preoperative staging of invasion depth in flat and depressed colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Y Saitoh; T Obara; K Einami; M Nomura; M Taruishi; T Ayabe; T Ashida; Y Shibata; Y Kohgo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Prediction of pathologic staging with magnetic resonance imaging after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: pooled analysis of KROG 10-01 and 11-02.

Authors:  Jong Hoon Lee; Hong Seok Jang; Jun-Gi Kim; Myung Ah Lee; Dae Yong Kim; Tae Hyun Kim; Jae Hwan Oh; Sung Chan Park; Sun Young Kim; Ji Yeon Baek; Hee Chul Park; Hee Cheol Kim; Taek-Keun Nam; Eui Kyu Chie; Ji-Han Jung; Seong Taek Oh
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Role of biopsies in patients with residual rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation after downsizing: can they rule out persisting cancer?

Authors:  R O Perez; A Habr-Gama; G V Pereira; P B Lynn; P A Alves; I Proscurshim; V Rawet; J Gama-Rodrigues
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Photoacoustic imaging aided with deep learning: a review.

Authors:  Praveenbalaji Rajendran; Arunima Sharma; Manojit Pramanik
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2021-11-23

2.  High-Precision Assessment of Chemoradiotherapy of Rectal Cancer with Near-Infrared Photoacoustic Microscopy and Deep Learning.

Authors:  Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Rectal Cancer Treatment Management: Deep-Learning Neural Network Based on Photoacoustic Microscopy Image Outperforms Histogram-Feature-Based Classification.

Authors:  Xiandong Leng; Eghbal Amidi; Sitai Kou; Hassam Cheema; Ebunoluwa Otegbeye; William Jr Chapman; Matthew Mutch; Quing Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.