Literature DB >> 33753835

Development of a semi-automated segmentation tool for high frequency ultrasound image analysis of mouse echocardiograms.

Kristi Powers1, Raymond Chang2, Justin Torello2, Rhonda Silva3, Yannick Cadoret3, William Cupelo3, Lori Morton2, Michael Dunn2.   

Abstract

Echocardiography is a widely used and clinically translatable imaging modality for the evaluation of cardiac structure and function in preclinical drug discovery and development. Echocardiograms are among the first in vivo diagnostic tools utilized to evaluate the heart due to its relatively low cost, high throughput acquisition, and non-invasive nature; however lengthy manual image analysis, intra- and inter-operator variability, and subjective image analysis presents a challenge for reproducible data generation in preclinical research. To combat the image-processing bottleneck and address both variability and reproducibly challenges, we developed a semi-automated analysis algorithm workflow to analyze long- and short-axis murine left ventricle (LV) ultrasound images. The long-axis B-mode algorithm executes a script protocol that is trained using a reference library of 322 manually segmented LV ultrasound images. The short-axis script was engineered to analyze M-mode ultrasound images in a semi-automated fashion using a pixel intensity evaluation approach, allowing analysts to place two seed-points to triangulate the local maxima of LV wall boundary annotations. Blinded operator evaluation of the semi-automated analysis tool was performed and compared to the current manual segmentation methodology for testing inter- and intra-operator reproducibility at baseline and after a pharmacologic challenge. Comparisons between manual and semi-automatic derivation of LV ejection fraction resulted in a relative difference of 1% for long-axis (B-mode) images and 2.7% for short-axis (M-mode) images. Our semi-automatic workflow approach reduces image analysis time and subjective bias, as well as decreases inter- and intra-operator variability, thereby enhancing throughput and improving data quality for pre-clinical in vivo studies that incorporate cardiac structure and function endpoints.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33753835      PMCID: PMC7985193          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85971-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  11 in total

Review 1.  Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  C G DeGroff
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Luigi P Badano; Victor Mor-Avi; Jonathan Afilalo; Anderson Armstrong; Laura Ernande; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Steven A Goldstein; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Patrizio Lancellotti; Denisa Muraru; Michael H Picard; Ernst R Rietzschel; Lawrence Rudski; Kirk T Spencer; Wendy Tsang; Jens-Uwe Voigt
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  A framework for analysis of linear ultrasound videos to detect fetal presentation and heartbeat.

Authors:  M A Maraci; C P Bridge; R Napolitano; A Papageorghiou; J A Noble
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  A new ultrasound instrument for in vivo microimaging of mice.

Authors:  F S Foster; M Y Zhang; Y Q Zhou; G Liu; J Mehi; E Cherin; K A Harasiewicz; B G Starkoski; L Zan; D A Knapik; S L Adamson
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  In vivo Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Ventricular Function in Transgenic and Gene-Targeted Mice.

Authors:  B D Hoit; R A Walsh
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.677

6.  Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by real-time, two-dimensional echocardiography. A comparison of cineangiographic and radionuclide techniques.

Authors:  E D Folland; A F Parisi; P F Moynihan; D R Jones; C L Feldman; D E Tow
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Murine echocardiography and ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Andrew Pistner; Stephen Belmonte; Tonya Coulthard; Burns Blaxall
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-08-08       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 8.  New approaches in small animal echocardiography: imaging the sounds of silence.

Authors:  Rashmi Ram; Deanne M Mickelsen; Catherine Theodoropoulos; Burns C Blaxall
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 9.  Echocardiography in translational research: of mice and men.

Authors:  Marielle Scherrer-Crosbie; Helène B Thibault
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 10.  A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications.

Authors:  Michelle L James; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 37.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.