| Literature DB >> 33753478 |
Yanhua Qu1, Chunhai Chen2, Xiumin Chen3, Yan Hao3,4, Huishang She3,4, Mengxia Wang3,4, Per G P Ericson5, Haiyan Lin3, Tianlong Cai3, Gang Song3, Chenxi Jia3, Chunyan Chen3, Hailin Zhang2, Jiang Li2, Liping Liang2, Tianyu Wu2, Jinyang Zhao2, Qiang Gao2, Guojie Zhang6,7,8,9, Weiwei Zhai3,8, Chi Zhang10, Yong E Zhang1,4,8,11, Fumin Lei1,4,8.
Abstract
Species in a shared environment tend to evolve similar adaptations under the influence of their phylogenetic context. Using snowfinches, a monophyletic group of passerine birds (Passeridae), we study the relative roles of ancestral and species-specific adaptations to an extreme high-elevation environment, the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Our ancestral trait reconstruction shows that the ancestral snowfinch occupied high elevations and had a larger body mass than most nonsnowfinches in Passeridae. Subsequently, this phenotypic adaptation diversified in the descendant species. By comparing high-quality genomes from representatives of the three phylogenetic lineages, we find that about 95% of genes under positive selection in the descendant species are different from those in the ancestor. Consistently, the biological functions enriched for these species differ from those of their ancestor to various degrees (semantic similarity values ranging from 0.27 to 0.5), suggesting that the three descendant species have evolved divergently from the initial adaptation in their common ancestor. Using a functional assay to a highly selective gene, DTL, we demonstrate that the nonsynonymous substitutions in the ancestor and descendant species have improved the repair capacity of ultraviolet-induced DNA damage. The repair kinetics of the DTL gene shows a twofold to fourfold variation across the ancestor and the descendants. Collectively, this study reveals an exceptional case of adaptive evolution to high-elevation environments, an evolutionary process with an initial adaptation in the common ancestor followed by adaptive diversification of the descendant species.Entities:
Keywords: DTL; common ancestry; comparative genomics; high-elevation adaptations; snowfinches
Year: 2021 PMID: 33753478 PMCID: PMC8020664 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2012398118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.The phylogenomic tree and ancestral trait reconstruction of the snowfinches. (A) Sampling sites of three species of snowfinches used in this study. For (A) and (B), three snowfinch lineages are similarly color-coded. (B) The phylogenomic tree suggests that the snowfinches diverged from montan between 10 and 18 Ma. The black dot marks the calibration point (26.0 ± 3.0 Ma) in estimating divergence time. (C) Reconstruction of the ancestral traits for 27 species from Passeridae suggests that the ancestor of the snowfinches occupied a high-elevation environment (Left) and evolved a large body size (Right). The ancestral branch (ancestor), the representatives from three main lineages (adamsi, rufico, and taczan), and a lowland relative, the Eurasian tree sparrow (montan), are marked along the tree. Twenty-seven species in Passeridae are collapsed into seven genera. The point estimates and 95% CIs of traits reconstructed for common ancestors of given genera are shown in numerical values and bars. Note only the point estimates are shown for the genera that have a single species (i.e., Onychostruthus, Petronia, and Hypocryptadius). The size of the triangle is proportional to the number of species. Phenograms in the inset show the trait evolution of the 27 species (y axis) over time (x axis) based on ancestral trait reconstruction with 95% CIs shown as shades. (D and E) Accumulation of elevation disparity (D) and body mass disparity (E) through time for all species of Passeridae (yellow curve lines) and snowfinches (green curve lines). The gray and orange shaded areas indicate time ranges when snowfinches split from nonsnowfinches and snowfinches diversified, respectively. Note that the divergence time of snowfinches in Päckert et al. (24) (C, D, and E) slightly differs from our phylogenomic tree in B.
Basic statistics for genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation of snowfinch species
| Species | Common name | Sequence data (G) | Insert size | Scaffold N50, Mb | Contig N50, Mb | Gene no. |
| White-rumped snowfinch | 152.6 | 170, 500, 800, 2,000, 5,000 | 9.07 | 0.67 | 15,585 | |
| Rufous-necked snowfinch | 118.5 | 170, 500, 2,000, 5,000 | 9.60 | 0.51 | 15,206 | |
| Black-winged snowfinch | 139.7 | 170, 500, 2,000, 5,000 | 10.06 | 0.37 | 15,136 |
Fig. 2.Positive selection analyses of snowfinches. (A) Numbers of PSGs in ancestor, taczan, rufico, and adamsi. Numbers of all PSGs are marked in red, and those shared between ancestor and all three descendant snowfinches (list on the ancestral branch) as well as between ancestor and each of the descendant snowfinches (list on the respective snowfinch branches) are marked in yellow and in brackets. We calculated the observed ratios of shared PSGs between ancestor and adamsi (0.04, 15/361), ancestor and rufico (0.05, 18/355), or ancestor and taczan (0.06, 24/377). We then tested these ratios against the expected ratio (0.02, 144/6,572 genes) using a binomial test. ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05. (B and C) Evolutionary rates of two representative genes (B, UBA6 and C, DTL). dN/dS, dN and dS in each branch are shown by black, blue, and green, respectively. (D) Statistics of nonsynonymous and synonymous substitutions in the WD40 and non-WD40 regions of the ancestor and three descendant snowfinch DTLs. The reason that we merged all three descendant species is because each species consists of only a few synonymous substitutions. Nonsyn, nonsynonymous substitutions; syn, synonymous substitutions. (E) Distribution of the nonsynonymous substitutions of the snowfinch and montan DTLs in the WD40 and non-WD40 regions, which are marked by black dots. The nonsynonymous substitutions of ancestor DTL, i.e., those shared by three snowfinches, are highlighted by purple boxes. Asterisks show sites containing two nonsynonymous substitutions, which could not be drawn separately due to the space limit.
Fig. 3.A schematic representation of DTL’s functional experiment. The embryo fibroblast cells from the great tit (named GEF) were used. After knocking down endogenous DTL and transfecting exogenous DTL, DTL, DTL, DTL, and DTL (), we exposed GEFs to UVB irradiation and checked repair kinetics (percent repair) by measuring two UV-induced photoproducts, 6-4PP and CPD. For each curve, the bar of SE is shown based on three biological replicates. Only post hoc t tests between each of snowfinch DTLs and DTL are shown. ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P ≤ 0.05; +P = 0.08; NS, not statistically significant. Statistical results of pairwise comparisons of snowfinch DTLs are shown in .
Fig. 4.Functional enrichment analyses of PSGs. (A) Distribution of overrepresented GO terms is shown as a pie chart below the branch. Numbers of PSGs applicable for enrichment analyses are shown above branches. Note that the number is smaller than the counterpart in Fig. 2 because some genes do not have a human ortholog and thus could not be included in the analyses. GO terms are grouped into seven major categories including developmental process (yellow), signaling (red), cellular process (dark blue), metabolic and catalytic processes (green), immune system process (light blue), response to stimulus (black), and others (purple). (B and C) The observed SS scores and permutated ones between ancestor and the descendant snowfinches based on genes (B) and GO terms (C). Two algorithms of summarization including RCMAX (Left) and BMA (Right) are used. Dark blue, light blue, and red vertical lines show the observed pairwise SS values between ancestor and each of the snowfinches (adamsi, rufico, and taczan, respectively). Blue (permutations based on same number of genes) and red (permutations based on same number of GO terms) shades show 10,000 permutated SS values with 95th and 90th percentiles labeled.