Literature DB >> 33753430

Self-reported sick leave following a brief preventive intervention on work-related stress: a randomised controlled trial in primary health care.

Anna-Maria Hultén1, Pernilla Bjerkeli2, Kristina Holmgren3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of a brief intervention about early identification of work-related stress combined with feedback at consultation with a general practitioner (GP) on the number of self-reported sick leave days.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. Prospective analyses of self-reported sick leave data collected between November 2015 and January 2017.
SETTING: Seven primary healthcare centres in western Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 271 employed, non-sick-listed patients aged 18-64 years seeking care for mental and/or physical health complaints. Of these, 132 patients were allocated to intervention and 139 patients to control.
INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group received a brief intervention about work-related stress, including training for GPs, screening of patients' work-related stress, feedback to patients on screening results and discussion of measures at GP consultation. The control group received treatment as usual. OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of self-reported gross sick leave days and the number of self-reported net sick leave days, thereby also considering part-time sick leave.
RESULTS: At 6 months' follow-up, 220/271 (81%) participants were assessed, while at 12 months' follow-up, 241/271 (89%) participants were assessed. At 6-month follow-up, 59/105 (56%) in the intervention group and 61/115 (53%) in the control group reported no sick leave. At 12-month follow-up, the corresponding numbers were 61/119 (51%) and 57/122 (47%), respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention group and the control group in the median number of self-reported gross sick leave days and the median number of self-reported net sick leave days.
CONCLUSIONS: The brief intervention showed no effect on the numbers of self-reported sick leave days for patients seeking care at the primary healthcare centres. Other actions and new types of interventions need to be explored to address patients' perceiving of ill health due to work-related stress. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02480855. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  medical education & training; occupational & industrial medicine; primary care; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33753430      PMCID: PMC7986880          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  46 in total

1.  Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 3. Causes of sickness absence: research approaches and explanatory models.

Authors:  Peter Allebeck; Arne Mastekaasa
Journal:  Scand J Public Health Suppl       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Screening to identify patients at risk: profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention.

Authors:  Katja Boersma; Steven J Linton
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 3.  Risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review of recent longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Bruno R da Costa; Edgar Ramos Vieira
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Early identification of work-related stress predicted sickness absence in employed women with musculoskeletal or mental disorders: a prospective, longitudinal study in a primary health care setting.

Authors:  Kristina Holmgren; Malin Fjällström-Lundgren; Gunnel Hensing
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.033

5.  Work ability as obscure, complex and unique: views of Swedish occupational therapists and physicians.

Authors:  Marine Sturesson; Curt Edlund; Anncristine Fjellman-Wiklund; Annie Hansen Falkdal; Birgitta Bernspång
Journal:  Work       Date:  2013

6.  Short-term sick leave and future risk of sickness absence and unemployment - the impact of health status.

Authors:  Hanna Hultin; Christina Lindholm; Mauricio Malfert; Jette Möller
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Typologies in GPs' referral practice.

Authors:  Olav Thorsen; Miriam Hartveit; Jan Olav Johannessen; Lars Fosse; Geir Egil Eide; Jörn Schulz; Anders Bærheim
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Prevalence of persons contacting general practice for psychological stress in Denmark.

Authors:  Jesper Lykkegaard; Marianne Rosendal; Karen Brask; Lars Brandt; Anders Prior
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.581

9.  Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: from the UK Whitehall II study.

Authors:  M Marmot; A Feeney; M Shipley; F North; S L Syme
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Structured early consultation with the occupational physician reduces sickness absence among office workers at high risk for long-term sickness absence: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ijmert Kant; Nicole W H Jansen; Ludovic G P M van Amelsvoort; Rudy van Leusden; Ate Berkouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-01-15
View more
  2 in total

1.  Does the Number of Reasons for Seeking Care and Self-Rated Health Predict Sick Leave during the Following 12 Months? A Prospective, Longitudinal Study in Swedish Primary Health Care.

Authors:  Kristin Lork; Kristina Holmgren; Jenny Hultqvist
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Work-related stress and future sick leave in a working population seeking care at primary health care centres: a prospective longitudinal study using the WSQ.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Hultén; Pernilla Bjerkeli; Kristina Holmgren
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.135

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.