| Literature DB >> 33753247 |
Alessandro Di Federico1, Andrea De Giglio2, Claudia Parisi3, Francesco Gelsomino4, Andrea Ardizzoni5.
Abstract
Treatment strategies for advanced NSCLC patients without driver molecular alterations are influenced by PD-L1 expression. If PD-L1 is <50 %, the preferred upfront treatment is the association of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, while immunotherapy alone is an additional option if PD-L1 ≥ 50 %. Both treatments demonstrated their superiority over chemotherapy in this subset of NSCLC patients, with comparable efficacy outcomes but less safety concerns for immunotherapy alone. Nevertheless, a significant difference in terms of early progression-free survival rate emerges by analyzing and comparing the survival curves of the two strategies, reflecting a non-negligible loss of patients due to early disease progression at 3 and 6 months from treatment initiation with immunotherapy alone as compared to its association with chemotherapy. We deeply analyzed efficacy similarities and differences of the two approaches in advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥50 %, trying to suggest clinical and biologic aspects to be considered when facing the treatment choice.Entities:
Keywords: Atezolizumab; Cemiplimab; Chemotherapy; Immune-checkpoint inhibitors; Immunotherapy; NSCLC; Nivolumab; Non-small cell lung cancer; PD-L1; Pembrolizumab; Sintilimab
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33753247 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ISSN: 1040-8428 Impact factor: 6.312