Scott Brimley1, Caleb Natale1, Brian Dick1, Alexander Pastuszak2, Mohit Khera2, Neil Baum1, Omer A Raheem3. 1. Department of Urology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA. 2. Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Urology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA. Electronic address: oraheem@tulane.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Although telemedicine (TM) has been available for several decades, the recent increase in its acceptance due to the COVID-19 pandemic has emerged as a valuable solution for the delivery of health care that provides easy, affordable, and convenient communication with urologic patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to highlight limiting factors and provide successful practical solutions to assist urologists in incorporating and maintaining TM in their practices. METHODS: A thorough literature review was conducted utilizing PubMed, Cochrane library, clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Search terms and keywords included "telemedicine" and "urology." Only articles written or translated into the English language were included. RESULTS: A total of 12 peer-reviewed articles were identified that discussed barriers for incorporation of TM in urology. Articles exclusive to the use of TM during the COVID-19 pandemic were also included, as well as American Urological Association and European Urological Association guidelines and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services statements and policies regarding TM pertinent to urological practice. CONCLUSION: TM is currently a viable option and fills an unmet need for most practicing urologists, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, offering insight to the relative ease of transition to online clinical practice. OA Raheem, S Brimley, C Natale, et al. The Emerging Critical Role of Telemedicine in the Urology Clinic: A Practical Guide. Sex Med Rev 2021;9:289-295.
INTRODUCTION: Although telemedicine (TM) has been available for several decades, the recent increase in its acceptance due to the COVID-19 pandemic has emerged as a valuable solution for the delivery of health care that provides easy, affordable, and convenient communication with urologic patients. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to highlight limiting factors and provide successful practical solutions to assist urologists in incorporating and maintaining TM in their practices. METHODS: A thorough literature review was conducted utilizing PubMed, Cochrane library, clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. Search terms and keywords included "telemedicine" and "urology." Only articles written or translated into the English language were included. RESULTS: A total of 12 peer-reviewed articles were identified that discussed barriers for incorporation of TM in urology. Articles exclusive to the use of TM during the COVID-19 pandemic were also included, as well as American Urological Association and European Urological Association guidelines and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services statements and policies regarding TM pertinent to urological practice. CONCLUSION: TM is currently a viable option and fills an unmet need for most practicing urologists, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, offering insight to the relative ease of transition to online clinical practice. OA Raheem, S Brimley, C Natale, et al. The Emerging Critical Role of Telemedicine in the Urology Clinic: A Practical Guide. Sex Med Rev 2021;9:289-295.
Authors: Boyd R Viers; Deborah J Lightner; Marcelino E Rivera; Matthew K Tollefson; Stephen A Boorjian; R Jeffrey Karnes; R Houston Thompson; Daniel A O'Neil; Rachel L Hamilton; Matthew R Gardner; Mary Bundrick; Sarah M Jenkins; Sandhya Pruthi; Igor Frank; Matthew T Gettman Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jason H Wasfy; Sandhya K Rao; Neil Kalwani; Melissa D Chittle; Calvin A Richardson; Kathleen M Gallen; Eric M Isselbacher; Alexandra B Kimball; Timothy G Ferris Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Chandy Ellimoottil; Ted Skolarus; Matthew Gettman; Richard Boxer; Alexander Kutikov; Benjamin R Lee; Jeremy Shelton; Todd Morgan Journal: Urology Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Severin Rodler; Johannes von Büren; Alexander Buchner; Christian Stief; Katja Elkhanova; Christian Wülfing; Sven Jungmann Journal: Sex Med Date: 2020-05-17 Impact factor: 2.491