Literature DB >> 33752700

Optimizing the design of a contraceptive microarray patch: a discrete choice experiment on women's preferences in India and Nigeria.

Rebecca L Callahan1, Aurélie Brunie2, Victoria Lebrun3, Mario Chen3, Christine L Godwin3, Kanchan Lakhwani4, Funmilola M OlaOlorun5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Efforts are underway to develop an easy-to-use contraceptive microarray patch (MAP) that could expand the range of self-administrable methods. This paper presents results from a discrete choice experiment (DCE) designed to support optimal product design.
METHODS: We conducted a DCE survey of users and non-users of contraception in New Delhi, India (496 women) and Ibadan, Nigeria (two versions with 530 and 416 women, respectively) to assess stated preferences for up to six potential product attributes: effect on menstruation, duration of effectiveness, application pain, location, rash after application, and patch size. We estimated Hierarchical Bayes coefficients (utilities) for each attribute level and ran simulations comparing women's preferences for hypothetical MAPs with varying attribute combinations.
RESULTS: The most important attributes of the MAP were potential for menstrual side effects (55% of preferences in India and 42% in Nigeria) and duration (13% of preferences in India and 24% in Nigeria). Women preferred a regular period over an irregular or no period, and a six-month duration to three or one month. Simulations show that the most ideal design would be a small patch, providing 6 months of protection, that would involve no pain on administration, result in a one-day rash, and be applied to the foot.
CONCLUSIONS: To the extent possible, MAP developers should consider method designs and formulations that limit menstrual side effects and provide more than one month of protection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Discrete choice experiment; India; Microarray patch; Nigeria; User preferences

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33752700      PMCID: PMC7986031          DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01113-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health        ISSN: 1742-4755            Impact factor:   3.223


  20 in total

Review 1.  Microneedle Patches as Drug and Vaccine Delivery Platform.

Authors:  Junwei Li; Mingtao Zeng; Hu Shan; Chunyi Tong
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution.

Authors:  Margaret E Kruk; Anna D Gage; Catherine Arsenault; Keely Jordan; Hannah H Leslie; Sanam Roder-DeWan; Olusoji Adeyi; Pierre Barker; Bernadette Daelmans; Svetlana V Doubova; Mike English; Ezequiel García-Elorrio; Frederico Guanais; Oye Gureje; Lisa R Hirschhorn; Lixin Jiang; Edward Kelley; Ephrem Tekle Lemango; Jerker Liljestrand; Address Malata; Tanya Marchant; Malebona Precious Matsoso; John G Meara; Manoj Mohanan; Youssoupha Ndiaye; Ole F Norheim; K Srinath Reddy; Alexander K Rowe; Joshua A Salomon; Gagan Thapa; Nana A Y Twum-Danso; Muhammad Pate
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 26.763

3.  Reasons for contraceptive nonuse among women having unmet need for contraception in developing countries.

Authors:  Gilda Sedgh; Rubina Hussain
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2014-06

Review 4.  Barriers to fertility regulation: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Martha Campbell; Nuriye Nalan Sahin-Hodoglugil; Malcolm Potts
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2006-06

5.  Client and provider experiences with self-administration of subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) in Malawi.

Authors:  Holly M Burke; Catherine Packer; Mercy Buluzi; Elise Healy; Bagrey Ngwira
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Do women and providers value the same features of contraceptive products? Results of a best-worst stated preference experiment.

Authors:  Edith Weisberg; Deborah Bateson; Stephanie Knox; Marion Haas; Rosalie Viney; Deborah Street; Denzil Fiebig
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 7.  There might be blood: a scoping review on women's responses to contraceptive-induced menstrual bleeding changes.

Authors:  Chelsea B Polis; Rubina Hussain; Amanda Berry
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  User preferences for a contraceptive microarray patch in India and Nigeria: Qualitative research on what women want.

Authors:  Aurélie Brunie; Rebecca L Callahan; Christine L Godwin; Jyoti Bajpai; Funmilola M OlaOlorun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Long-acting reversible contraception by effervescent microneedle patch.

Authors:  Wei Li; Jie Tang; Richard N Terry; Song Li; Aurelie Brunie; Rebecca L Callahan; Richard K Noel; Carlos A Rodríguez; Steven P Schwendeman; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  A review of the application and contribution of discrete choice experiments to inform human resources policy interventions.

Authors:  Mylene Lagarde; Duane Blaauw
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2009-07-24
View more
  2 in total

1.  Human-centred design of a new microneedle-based hormonal contraceptive delivery system.

Authors:  Benedetta Gualeni; Louise Hughes; Isabelle Stauber; Louise Ackers; Angela Gorman; Dorothy Gashuga; Nettie Dzabala; Frider Chimimba; Ibrahim Chikowe; Sion A Coulman; James C Birchall
Journal:  Gates Open Res       Date:  2021-07-30

2.  Providers' views on hormonal family planning methods for young women: a qualitative study from Dosso, Niger.

Authors:  Amelia Maytan-Joneydi; Ellen W MacLachlan; Balki Ibrahim Agali; Kyria Louis-Charles; Sanoussi Chaibou; Souleymane Amadou Garba; Abdoul Nouhou Moumouni; Ilene S Speizer
Journal:  Gates Open Res       Date:  2022-10-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.