Literature DB >> 33752699

Evaluation of a highly refined prediction model in knowledge-based volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for cervical cancer.

Mingli Wang1,2,3, Huikuan Gu1,2,3, Jiang Hu1,2,3, Jian Liang1,2,3, Sisi Xu1,2,3, Zhenyu Qi4,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To explore whether a highly refined dose volume histograms (DVH) prediction model can improve the accuracy and reliability of knowledge-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The proposed model underwent repeated refining through progressive training until the training samples increased from initial 25 prior plans up to 100 cases. The estimated DVHs derived from the prediction models of different runs of training were compared in 35 new cervical cancer patients to analyze the effect of such an interactive plan and model evolution method. The reliability and efficiency of knowledge-based planning (KBP) using this highly refined model in improving the consistency and quality of the VMAT plans were also evaluated.
RESULTS: The prediction ability was reinforced with the increased number of refinements in terms of normal tissue sparing. With enhanced prediction accuracy, more than 60% of automatic plan-6 (AP-6) plans (22/35) can be directly approved for clinical treatment without any manual revision. The plan quality scores for clinically approved plans (CPs) and manual plans (MPs) were on average 89.02 ± 4.83 and 86.48 ± 3.92 (p < 0.001). Knowledge-based planning significantly reduced the Dmean and V18 Gy for kidney (L/R), the Dmean, V30 Gy, and V40 Gy for bladder, rectum, and femoral head (L/R).
CONCLUSION: The proposed model evolution method provides a practical way for the KBP to enhance its prediction ability with minimal human intervene. This highly refined prediction model can better guide KBP in improving the consistency and quality of the VMAT plans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Knowledge-based planning; Prediction model; Progressive training; Volumetric modulated arc therapy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33752699      PMCID: PMC7983216          DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01783-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1748-717X            Impact factor:   3.481


  27 in total

1.  Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Kevin L Moore; R Scott Brame; Daniel A Low; Sasa Mutic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  A planning quality evaluation tool for prostate adaptive IMRT based on machine learning.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Zhu; Yaorong Ge; Taoran Li; Danthai Thongphiew; Fang-Fang Yin; Q Jackie Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaodong Zhang; Xiaoqiang Li; Enzhuo M Quan; Xiaoning Pan; Yupeng Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Enzhuo M Quan; Xiaoqiang Li; Yupeng Li; Xiaochun Wang; Rajat J Kudchadker; Jennifer L Johnson; Deborah A Kuban; Andrew K Lee; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Increased organ sparing using shape-based treatment plan optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Steven F Petit; Binbin Wu; Michael Kazhdan; André Dekker; Patricio Simari; Rachit Kumar; Russel Taylor; Joseph M Herman; Todd McNutt
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Binbin Wu; Francesco Ricchetti; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Michael Kazhdan; Patricio Simari; Robert Jacques; Russell Taylor; Todd McNutt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  External Beam Radiation Therapy and Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer: The Experience of the National Centre for Radiotherapy in Accra, Ghana.

Authors:  Horia Vulpe; Francis Adumata Asamoah; Manjula Maganti; Verna Vanderpuye; Anthony Fyles; Joel Yarney
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control.

Authors:  Binbin Wu; Francesco Ricchetti; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Misha Kazhdan; Patricio Simari; Ming Chuang; Russell Taylor; Robert Jacques; Todd McNutt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Does initial 45Gy of pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduce late complications in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? A cohort control study using definitive chemoradiotherapy with high-dose rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Shang-Wen Chen; Ji-An Liang; Yao-Ching Hung; Lian-Shung Yeh; Wei-Chun Chang; Wu-Chou Lin; Chun-Ru Chien
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Clinical Outcomes of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Following Intracavitary/Interstitial Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Single Institution Retrospective Experience.

Authors:  Yanzhu Lin; Yi Ouyang; Kai Chen; Zhiyuan Lu; Yonghong Liu; Xinping Cao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of auto-planning in VMAT for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Chen Jihong; Chen Kaiqiang; Dai Yitao; Zhang Xiuchun; Chen Yanyu; Bai Penggang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.