Yvonne J M van Cauteren1,2,3, Martijn W Smulders2,3, Ralph A L J Theunissen2, Suzanne C Gerretsen1, Bouke P Adriaans1,2,3, Geertruida P Bijvoet2, Alma M A Mingels4, Sander M J van Kuijk5, Simon Schalla1,2,3, Harry J G M Crijns2,3, Raymond J Kim6, Joachim E Wildberger1,3, Jordi Heijman2,3, Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers7,8,9. 1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Cardiology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 3. Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 6. Duke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 7. Department of Cardiology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. s.bekkers@mumc.nl. 8. Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. s.bekkers@mumc.nl. 9. Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. s.bekkers@mumc.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is still the reference test in suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), although a substantial number of patients do not have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Early cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) may be a useful gatekeeper for ICA in this setting. The main objective was to investigate the accuracy of CMR to detect obstructive CAD in NSTEMI. METHODS: This study is a sub-analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigating whether a non-invasive imaging-first strategy safely reduced the number of ICA compared to routine clinical care in suspected NSTEMI (acute chest pain, non-diagnostic electrocardiogram, high sensitivity troponin T > 14 ng/L), and included 51 patients who underwent CMR prior to ICA. A stepwise approach was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CMR to detect (1) obstructive CAD (diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by ICA) and (2) an adjudicated final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). First, in all patients the combination of cine, T2-weighted and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging was evaluated for the presence of abnormalities consistent with a coronary etiology in any sequence. Hereafter and only when the scan was normal or equivocal, adenosine stress-perfusion CMR was added. RESULTS:Of 51 patients included (63 ± 10 years, 51% male), 34 (67%) had obstructive CAD by ICA. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of the first step to diagnose obstructive CAD were 79%, 71% and 77%, respectively. Additional vasodilator stress-perfusion CMR was performed in 19 patients and combined with step one resulted in an overall sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 65% and accuracy of 86%. Of the remaining 17 patients with non-obstructive CAD, 4 (24%) had evidence for a myocardial infarction on LGE, explaining the modest specificity. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy to diagnose ACS (n = 43) were 88%, 88% and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CMR accurately detects obstructive CAD and ACS in suspected NSTEMI. Non-obstructive CAD is common with CMR still identifying an infarction in almost one-quarter of patients. CMR should be considered as an early diagnostic approach in suspected NSTEMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The CARMENTA trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT01559467.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is still the reference test in suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), although a substantial number of patients do not have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Early cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) may be a useful gatekeeper for ICA in this setting. The main objective was to investigate the accuracy of CMR to detect obstructive CAD in NSTEMI. METHODS: This study is a sub-analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigating whether a non-invasive imaging-first strategy safely reduced the number of ICA compared to routine clinical care in suspected NSTEMI (acute chest pain, non-diagnostic electrocardiogram, high sensitivity troponin T > 14 ng/L), and included 51 patients who underwent CMR prior to ICA. A stepwise approach was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CMR to detect (1) obstructive CAD (diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by ICA) and (2) an adjudicated final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). First, in all patients the combination of cine, T2-weighted and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging was evaluated for the presence of abnormalities consistent with a coronary etiology in any sequence. Hereafter and only when the scan was normal or equivocal, adenosinestress-perfusion CMR was added. RESULTS: Of 51 patients included (63 ± 10 years, 51% male), 34 (67%) had obstructive CAD by ICA. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of the first step to diagnose obstructive CAD were 79%, 71% and 77%, respectively. Additional vasodilator stress-perfusion CMR was performed in 19 patients and combined with step one resulted in an overall sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 65% and accuracy of 86%. Of the remaining 17 patients with non-obstructive CAD, 4 (24%) had evidence for a myocardial infarction on LGE, explaining the modest specificity. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy to diagnose ACS (n = 43) were 88%, 88% and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSION: CMR accurately detects obstructive CAD and ACS in suspected NSTEMI. Non-obstructive CAD is common with CMR still identifying an infarction in almost one-quarter of patients. CMR should be considered as an early diagnostic approach in suspected NSTEMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The CARMENTA trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT01559467.
Authors: Manesh R Patel; Anita Y Chen; Eric D Peterson; L Kristin Newby; Charles V Pollack; Ralph G Brindis; C Michael Gibson; Neal S Kleiman; Jorge F Saucedo; Deepak L Bhatt; W Brian Gibler; E Magnus Ohman; Robert A Harrington; Matthew T Roe Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Dina Melki; Johan Lugnegård; Joakim Alfredsson; Suzanne Lind; Kai M Eggers; Bertil Lindahl; Tomas Jernberg Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Martijn W Smulders; Bas L J H Kietselaer; Joachim E Wildberger; Pieter C Dagnelie; Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Alma M A Mingels; Yvonne J M van Cauteren; Ralph A L J Theunissen; Mark J Post; Simon Schalla; Sander M J van Kuijk; Marco Das; Raymond J Kim; Harry J G M Crijns; Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sven Plein; John P Greenwood; John P Ridgway; Gillian Cranny; Stephen G Ball; Mohan U Sivananthan Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-12-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: John P Greenwood; David P Ripley; Colin Berry; Gerry P McCann; Sven Plein; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Erica Dall'Armellina; Abhiram Prasad; Petra Bijsterveld; James R Foley; Kenneth Mangion; Mark Sculpher; Simon Walker; Colin C Everett; David A Cairns; Linda D Sharples; Julia M Brown Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Caroline Jaarsma; Tim Leiner; Sebastiaan C Bekkers; Harry J Crijns; Joachim E Wildberger; Eike Nagel; Patricia J Nelemans; Simon Schalla Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jean-Philippe Collet; Holger Thiele; Emanuele Barbato; Olivier Barthélémy; Johann Bauersachs; Deepak L Bhatt; Paul Dendale; Maria Dorobantu; Thor Edvardsen; Thierry Folliguet; Chris P Gale; Martine Gilard; Alexander Jobs; Peter Jüni; Ekaterini Lambrinou; Basil S Lewis; Julinda Mehilli; Emanuele Meliga; Béla Merkely; Christian Mueller; Marco Roffi; Frans H Rutten; Dirk Sibbing; George C M Siontis Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Daniel R Messroghli; James C Moon; Vanessa M Ferreira; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Taigang He; Peter Kellman; Julia Mascherbauer; Reza Nezafat; Michael Salerno; Erik B Schelbert; Andrew J Taylor; Richard Thompson; Martin Ugander; Ruud B van Heeswijk; Matthias G Friedrich Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Ibrahim Danad; Jackie Szymonifka; Jos W R Twisk; Bjarne L Norgaard; Christopher K Zarins; Paul Knaapen; James K Min Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 35.855