Literature DB >> 33752696

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance accurately detects obstructive coronary artery disease in suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a sub-analysis of the CARMENTA Trial.

Yvonne J M van Cauteren1,2,3, Martijn W Smulders2,3, Ralph A L J Theunissen2, Suzanne C Gerretsen1, Bouke P Adriaans1,2,3, Geertruida P Bijvoet2, Alma M A Mingels4, Sander M J van Kuijk5, Simon Schalla1,2,3, Harry J G M Crijns2,3, Raymond J Kim6, Joachim E Wildberger1,3, Jordi Heijman2,3, Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers7,8,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is still the reference test in suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), although a substantial number of patients do not have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Early cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) may be a useful gatekeeper for ICA in this setting. The main objective was to investigate the accuracy of CMR to detect obstructive CAD in NSTEMI.
METHODS: This study is a sub-analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigating whether a non-invasive imaging-first strategy safely reduced the number of ICA compared to routine clinical care in suspected NSTEMI (acute chest pain, non-diagnostic electrocardiogram, high sensitivity troponin T > 14 ng/L), and included 51 patients who underwent CMR prior to ICA. A stepwise approach was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of CMR to detect (1) obstructive CAD (diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by ICA) and (2) an adjudicated final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). First, in all patients the combination of cine, T2-weighted and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging was evaluated for the presence of abnormalities consistent with a coronary etiology in any sequence. Hereafter and only when the scan was normal or equivocal, adenosine stress-perfusion CMR was added.
RESULTS: Of 51 patients included (63 ± 10 years, 51% male), 34 (67%) had obstructive CAD by ICA. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of the first step to diagnose obstructive CAD were 79%, 71% and 77%, respectively. Additional vasodilator stress-perfusion CMR was performed in 19 patients and combined with step one resulted in an overall sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 65% and accuracy of 86%. Of the remaining 17 patients with non-obstructive CAD, 4 (24%) had evidence for a myocardial infarction on LGE, explaining the modest specificity. The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy to diagnose ACS (n = 43) were 88%, 88% and 88%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: CMR accurately detects obstructive CAD and ACS in suspected NSTEMI. Non-obstructive CAD is common with CMR still identifying an infarction in almost one-quarter of patients. CMR should be considered as an early diagnostic approach in suspected NSTEMI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The CARMENTA trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT01559467.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute coronary syndrome; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Diagnostic accuracy; High-sensitivity cardiac troponin; Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction

Year:  2021        PMID: 33752696      PMCID: PMC7983380          DOI: 10.1186/s12968-021-00723-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  29 in total

1.  Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and insignificant coronary artery disease: results from the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) initiative.

Authors:  Manesh R Patel; Anita Y Chen; Eric D Peterson; L Kristin Newby; Charles V Pollack; Ralph G Brindis; C Michael Gibson; Neal S Kleiman; Jorge F Saucedo; Deepak L Bhatt; W Brian Gibler; E Magnus Ohman; Robert A Harrington; Matthew T Roe
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Implications of Introducing High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Into Clinical Practice: Data From the SWEDEHEART Registry.

Authors:  Dina Melki; Johan Lugnegård; Joakim Alfredsson; Suzanne Lind; Kai M Eggers; Bertil Lindahl; Tomas Jernberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with myocardial infarction: current and emerging applications.

Authors:  Han W Kim; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Initial Imaging-Guided Strategy Versus Routine Care in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Martijn W Smulders; Bas L J H Kietselaer; Joachim E Wildberger; Pieter C Dagnelie; Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Alma M A Mingels; Yvonne J M van Cauteren; Ralph A L J Theunissen; Mark J Post; Simon Schalla; Sander M J van Kuijk; Marco Das; Raymond J Kim; Harry J G M Crijns; Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sven Plein; John P Greenwood; John P Ridgway; Gillian Cranny; Stephen G Ball; Mohan U Sivananthan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Effect of Care Guided by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy, or NICE Guidelines on Subsequent Unnecessary Angiography Rates: The CE-MARC 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  John P Greenwood; David P Ripley; Colin Berry; Gerry P McCann; Sven Plein; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Erica Dall'Armellina; Abhiram Prasad; Petra Bijsterveld; James R Foley; Kenneth Mangion; Mark Sculpher; Simon Walker; Colin C Everett; David A Cairns; Linda D Sharples; Julia M Brown
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caroline Jaarsma; Tim Leiner; Sebastiaan C Bekkers; Harry J Crijns; Joachim E Wildberger; Eike Nagel; Patricia J Nelemans; Simon Schalla
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Collet; Holger Thiele; Emanuele Barbato; Olivier Barthélémy; Johann Bauersachs; Deepak L Bhatt; Paul Dendale; Maria Dorobantu; Thor Edvardsen; Thierry Folliguet; Chris P Gale; Martine Gilard; Alexander Jobs; Peter Jüni; Ekaterini Lambrinou; Basil S Lewis; Julinda Mehilli; Emanuele Meliga; Béla Merkely; Christian Mueller; Marco Roffi; Frans H Rutten; Dirk Sibbing; George C M Siontis
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: A consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI).

Authors:  Daniel R Messroghli; James C Moon; Vanessa M Ferreira; Lars Grosse-Wortmann; Taigang He; Peter Kellman; Julia Mascherbauer; Reza Nezafat; Michael Salerno; Erik B Schelbert; Andrew J Taylor; Richard Thompson; Martin Ugander; Ruud B van Heeswijk; Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Danad; Jackie Szymonifka; Jos W R Twisk; Bjarne L Norgaard; Christopher K Zarins; Paul Knaapen; James K Min
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 35.855

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.