Literature DB >> 33752672

A rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception.

Heather C M Allaway1, Roger A Pierson2,3, Jesse Invik3, Susan A Bloomfield4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARC; progestin only) are an increasingly common hormonal contraceptive choice in reproductive aged women looking to suppress ovarian function and menstrual cyclicity. The overall objective was to develop and validate a rodent model of implanted etonogestrel (ENG) LARC, at body size equivalent doses to the average dose received by women during each of the first 3 years of ENG subdermal rod LARC use.
METHODS: Intact, virgin, female Sprague-Dawley rats (16-wk-old) were randomized to 1 of 4 groups (n = 8/group) of ENG LARC (high-0.30μg/d, medium-0.17μg/d, low-0.09μg/d, placebo-0.00μg/d) via a slow-release pellet implanted subcutaneously. Animals were monitored for 21 days before and 29 days following pellet implantation using vaginal smears, ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), saphenous blood draws, food consumption, and body weights. Data were analyzed by chi-square, non-parametric, univariate, and repeated measures 2-way ANOVA.
RESULTS: Prior to pellet implantation there was no difference in time spent in estrus cycle phases among the treatment groups (p > 0.30). Following pellet implantation there was a dose-dependent impact on the time spent in diestrus and estrus (p < 0.05), with the high dose group spending more days in diestrus and fewer days in estrus. Prior to pellet insertion there was not an association between treatment group and estrus cycle classification (p = 0.57) but following pellet implantation there was a dose-dependent association with cycle classification (p < 0.02). Measurements from the UBM (ovarian volume, follicle count, corpora lutea count) indicate an alteration of ovarian function following pellet implantation.
CONCLUSION: Assessment of estrus cyclicity indicated a dose-response relationship in the shift to a larger number of acyclic rats and longer in duration spent in the diestrus phase. Therefore, each dose in this model mimics some of the changes observed in the ovaries of women using ENG LARC and provides an opportunity for investigating the impacts on non-reproductive tissues in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Estrus cycle; Etonogestrel; Hormonal contraception; Long-acting reversible contraception; Ovarian function; Progestin; Ultrasound biomicroscopy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33752672      PMCID: PMC7983206          DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00729-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol        ISSN: 1477-7827            Impact factor:   5.211


  33 in total

Review 1.  Progestin implants.

Authors:  H B Croxatto
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2000 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 2.  Hormonal contraception and bone metabolism: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carmine Nappi; Giuseppe Bifulco; Giovanni A Tommaselli; Virginia Gargano; Costantino Di Carlo
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Steroid hormone contraception and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study in an international population. The WHO Study of Hormonal Contraception and Bone Health.

Authors:  D B Petitti; G Piaggio; S Mehta; M C Cravioto; O Meirik
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Release characteristics, ovarian activity and menstrual bleeding pattern with a single contraceptive implant releasing 3-ketodesogestrel.

Authors:  G C Davies; L X Feng; J R Newton; A Van Beek; H J Coelingh-Bennink
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Use of intrauterine devices in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Patricia A Lohr; Richard Lyus; Sarah Prager
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Long-term depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone mineral density.

Authors:  O S Tang; G Tang; P Yip; B Li; S Fan
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 7.  Mechanisms that explain the contraceptive action of progestin implants for women.

Authors:  Horacio B Croxatto
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Bone density in long term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Authors:  B Gbolade; S Ellis; B Murby; S Randall; R Kirkman
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1998-07

9.  Bone density in women receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception.

Authors:  T Cundy; M Evans; H Roberts; D Wattie; R Ames; I R Reid
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-07-06

10.  Extended use up to 5 years of the etonogestrel-releasing subdermal contraceptive implant: comparison to levonorgestrel-releasing subdermal implant.

Authors:  Moazzam Ali; Ayse Akin; Luis Bahamondes; Vivian Brache; Ndema Habib; Sihem Landoulsi; David Hubacher
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.