Literature DB >> 33752647

Improved adherence with Medicines Use Review service in Slovenia: a randomized controlled trial.

Urška Nabergoj Makovec1, Igor Locatelli1, Mitja Kos2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Based on several existing patient-oriented activities, Medicines Use Review (MUR) service was standardized and officially adopted in Slovenia in 2015. Service aims to provide adherence support and ensure safe and effective medicines use. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the benefits of MUR in Slovenia, primarily the impact on medication adherence.
METHODS: A randomised controlled trial was performed in community pharmacies to compare MUR with standard care. Patients were randomised into either the test (patients received MUR by a certified MUR provider at visit 1), or control group. The study primary outcome was self-reported adherence to multiple medications, assessed by electronic ©Morisky Widget MMAS-8 Software at the first visit (V1) and after 12 weeks (V2). A sub-analysis of intentional and unintentional non-adherence was performed. MUR impact was defined as the relative difference in ©MMAS-8 score after 12 weeks between the test and control group. A multiple linear regression model was used to predict MUR impact based on baseline adherence (low versus medium and high). Several secondary outcomes (e.g. evaluation of drug-related problems (DRPs)) were also assessed.
RESULTS: Data from 153 (V1) and 140 (V2) patients were analysed. Baseline adherence was low, moderate and high in 17.6, 48.4 and 34.0% patients, respectively. In the low adherence subpopulation, test group patients showed a 1.20 point (95% CI = 0.16-2.25) increase in total ©MMAS-8 score (p = 0.025) compared to control group patients. A 0.84 point (95% CI = 0.05-1.63) increase was due to intentional non-adherence (p = 0.038), and a 0.36 point (95% CI = - 0.23-0.95) was due to unintentional non-adherence (p = 0.226). Additionally, statistically significant decrease in the proportion of patients with manifested DRPs (p < 0.001) and concerns regarding chronic medicines use (p = 0.029) were revealed.
CONCLUSION: MUR service in Slovenia improves low medication adherence and is effective in addressing DRPs and concerns regarding chronic medicines use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT04417400 ; 4th June 2020; retrospectively registered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Community pharmacy; Drug related problems; Medication review; Medicines Use Review

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33752647      PMCID: PMC7986462          DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06223-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  50 in total

Review 1.  CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  David Moher; Sally Hopewell; Kenneth F Schulz; Victor Montori; Peter C Gøtzsche; P J Devereaux; Diana Elbourne; Matthias Egger; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.071

2.  Retrospective examination of selected outcomes of Medicines Use Review (MUR) services in New Zealand.

Authors:  Ernieda Hatah; June Tordoff; Stephen B Duffull; Claire Cameron; Rhiannon Braund
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-03-15

3.  Large scale implementation of clinical medication reviews in Dutch community pharmacies: drug-related problems and interventions.

Authors:  Thomas G H Kempen; Caroline H P A van de Steeg-van Gompel; Petra Hoogland; Yuqian Liu; Marcel L Bouvy
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-04-16

4.  PCNE definition of medication review: reaching agreement.

Authors:  Nina Griese-Mammen; Kurt E Hersberger; Markus Messerli; Saija Leikola; Nejc Horvat; J W Foppe van Mil; Mitja Kos
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-08-02

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.

Authors:  Adam P Bress; Brandon K Bellows; Jordan B King; Rachel Hess; Srinivasan Beddhu; Zugui Zhang; Dan R Berlowitz; Molly B Conroy; Larry Fine; Suzanne Oparil; Donald E Morisky; Lewis E Kazis; Natalia Ruiz-Negrón; Jamie Powell; Leonardo Tamariz; Jeff Whittle; Jackson T Wright; Mark A Supiano; Alfred K Cheung; William S Weintraub; Andrew E Moran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Impact of a community pharmacist-led medication review on medicines use in patients on polypharmacy--a prospective randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Markus Messerli; Eva Blozik; Noortje Vriends; Kurt E Hersberger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Development and validation of a revised instrument to measure burden of long-term medicines use: the Living with Medicines Questionnaire version 3.

Authors:  Barbra Katusiime; Sarah A Corlett; Janet Krska
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2018-05-28

Review 8.  Community pharmacy Medicines Use Review: current challenges.

Authors:  Asam Latif
Journal:  Integr Pharm Res Pract       Date:  2018-07-09

9.  Definitions, variants, and causes of nonadherence with medication: a challenge for tailored interventions.

Authors:  Jacqueline G Hugtenburg; Lonneke Timmers; Petra Jm Elders; Marcia Vervloet; Liset van Dijk
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 10.  Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects.

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; John Witton; Diana R Elbourne
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of Pharmacists' Willingness to Conduct Medication Use Reviews in Poland.

Authors:  Piotr Merks; Urszula Religioni; Magdalena Waszyk-Nowaczyk; Justyna Kaźmierczak; Artur Białoszewski; Eliza Blicharska; Anna Kowalczuk; Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.