Literature DB >> 33752631

Intensive neurorehabilitation for patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: protocol of a mixed-methods study focusing on outcomes, ethics and impact.

Manju Sharma-Virk1,2, Willemijn S van Erp3,4,5, Jan C M Lavrijsen3, Raymond T C M Koopmans3,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC) are amongst the severest sequelae of acquired brain injury. Evidence regarding epidemiology and rehabilitation outcomes is scarce. These knowledge gaps and psychological distress in families of PDOC patients may complicate clinical decision-making. The complex PDOC care and associated moral dilemmas result in high workload in healthcare professionals. Since 2019, all PDOC patients in the Netherlands have access to intensive neurorehabilitation up to 2 years post-injury provided by one rehabilitation center and four specialized nursing homes. Systematic monitoring of quantitative rehabilitation data within this novel chain of care is done in a study called DOCTOR. The optimization of tailored PDOC care, however, demands a better understanding of the impact of PDOC on patients, their families and healthcare professionals and their views on rehabilitation outcomes, end-of-life decisions and quality of dying. The True Outcomes of PDOC (TOPDOC) study aims to gain insight in the qualitative outcomes of PDOC rehabilitation and impact of PDOC on patients, their families and healthcare professionals.
METHODS: Nationwide multicenter prospective cohort study in the settings of early and prolonged intensive neurorehabilitation with a two-year follow-up period, involving three study populations: PDOC patients > 16 years, patients' family members and healthcare professionals involved in PDOC care. Families' and healthcare professionals' views on quality of rehabilitation outcomes, end-of-life decisions and dying will be qualitatively assessed using comprehensive questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Ethical dilemmas will be explored by studying moral deliberations. The impact of providing care to PDOC patients on healthcare professionals will be studied in focus groups. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first nationwide study exploring quality of outcomes, end-of-life decisions and dying in PDOC patients and the impact of PDOC in a novel chain of care spanning the first 24 months post-injury in specialized rehabilitation and nursing home settings. Newly acquired knowledge in TOPDOC concerning quality of outcomes in PDOC rehabilitation, ethical aspects and the impact of PDOC will enrich quantitative epidemiological knowledge and outcomes arising from DOCTOR. Together, these projects will contribute to the optimization of centralized PDOC care providing support to PDOC patients, families and healthcare professionals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute brain injury; End-of-life decisions; Prolonged disorders of consciousness; Rehabilitation outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33752631      PMCID: PMC7983203          DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02158-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Neurol        ISSN: 1471-2377            Impact factor:   2.474


  55 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of chronic minimally conscious and vegetative states.

Authors:  J Luauté; D Maucort-Boulch; L Tell; F Quelard; T Sarraf; J Iwaz; D Boisson; C Fischer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Death after withdrawal of nutrition and hydration.

Authors:  Paul Chamberlain
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Apr 23-29       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Withdrawing life support from patients in a persistent vegetative state: the law in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Sjef Gevers
Journal:  Eur J Health Law       Date:  2005-12

4.  Nancy Cruzan and the right to die.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-09-06       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Supporting families involved in court cases about life-sustaining treatment: Working as academics, advocates and activists.

Authors:  Celia Kitzinger; Jenny Kitzinger
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 1.898

6.  The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility.

Authors:  Joseph T Giacino; Kathleen Kalmar; John Whyte
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 7.  The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Joseph T Giacino; S Ashwal; N Childs; R Cranford; B Jennett; D I Katz; J P Kelly; J H Rosenberg; J Whyte; R D Zafonte; N D Zasler
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-02-12       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Disorders of consciousness and disordered care: families, caregivers, and narratives of necessity.

Authors:  Joseph J Fins
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Functional outcomes in traumatic disorders of consciousness: 5-year outcomes from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems.

Authors:  John Whyte; Risa Nakase-Richardson; Flora M Hammond; Shane McNamee; Joseph T Giacino; Kathleen Kalmar; Brian D Greenwald; Stuart A Yablon; Lawrence J Horn
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: Outcomes from a vicious circle.

Authors:  Willemijn S van Erp; Jan C M Lavrijsen; Pieter E Vos; Steven Laureys; Raymond T C M Koopmans
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  1 in total

1.  The neuroethics of disorders of consciousness: a brief history of evolving ideas.

Authors:  Michael J Young; Yelena G Bodien; Joseph T Giacino; Joseph J Fins; Robert D Truog; Leigh R Hochberg; Brian L Edlow
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 13.501

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.