Literature DB >> 33752608

Video as an alternative to in-person consultations in outpatient renal transplant recipient follow-up: a qualitative study.

Cecilie Varsi1,2, Aud-Eldrid Stenehjem3, Elin Børøsund4, Lise Solberg Nes4,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renal transplant recipients have to see a nephrologist for regular follow-up for the rest of their lives. To reduce the burden for the patients, video consultation can be an alternative to traditional in-person hospital consultations. The aim of the current study was, from the perspectives of patients and health care providers, to investigate the perceived benefits and challenges of using video consultations in outpatient renal transplant recipient follow-up.
METHODS: Patients (i.e., renal transplant recipients; n = 18) alternated between regular in-person follow-up consultations and video consultations. Patients and health care providers were then invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Patients interviewed (n = 15) were median 53 years old (range 37-64) and 53% female. The video consultation solution used in the study turned out to have major technical deficiencies. Despite the technical challenges, however, the majority of the patients reported appreciating being able to alternate between video and in-person hospital consultations. Main benefits reported included not needing to travel to the hospital and thereby saving time, less focus on being chronically ill and potential economic benefits for patients and society. The health care providers (n = 3) also valued the benefits provided by the use of video consultations, but described the reoccurring technical challenges as disruptive. The fact that patients were in a stable phase of their health condition and already had an established, trusting relationship with their nephrologist, acted as facilitators for success. Possible challenges and harms described included concerns related to security, confidentiality and interruptions, as well as the potential need for physical examinations.
CONCLUSIONS: Benefits from using video consultations as an alternative to in-person consultations may outweigh potential technological challenges for patients as well as health care providers. A long-lasting mutually trusting relationship between patient and provider may be an important prerequisite for the experienced benefits of using video consultation. Findings also indicate that starting such care delivery changes in a small-scale, with a few selected patients in a stable phase of their condition, may be an important factor for success.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health services; Kidney diseases; Organ transplantation; Outpatients; Qualitative research; Telemedicine; Video consultation; eHealth

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33752608      PMCID: PMC7983085          DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02284-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Nephrol        ISSN: 1471-2369            Impact factor:   2.388


  24 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of internet-based self-help therapeutic interventions to improve distress and disease-control among adults with chronic health conditions.

Authors:  Lisa Beatty; Sylvie Lambert
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2013-06

2.  Patient Perceptions of Telehealth Primary Care Video Visits.

Authors:  Rhea E Powell; Jeffrey M Henstenburg; Grace Cooper; Judd E Hollander; Kristin L Rising
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Systematic review of patient and caregivers' satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patients' health.

Authors:  Joseph F Orlando; Matthew Beard; Saravana Kumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Acceptability, benefits, and challenges of video consulting: a qualitative study in primary care.

Authors:  Eddie Donaghy; Helen Atherton; Victoria Hammersley; Hannah McNeilly; Annemieke Bikker; Lucy Robbins; John Campbell; Brian McKinstry
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care.

Authors:  Victoria Hammersley; Eddie Donaghy; Richard Parker; Hannah McNeilly; Helen Atherton; Annemieke Bikker; John Campbell; Brian McKinstry
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Implementation Strategies to Enhance the Implementation of eHealth Programs for Patients With Chronic Illnesses: Realist Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cecilie Varsi; Lise Solberg Nes; Olöf Birna Kristjansdottir; Saskia M Kelders; Una Stenberg; Heidi Andersen Zangi; Elin Børøsund; Karen Elizabeth Weiss; Audun Stubhaug; Rikke Aune Asbjørnsen; Marianne Westeng; Marte Ødegaard; Hilde Eide
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Antoine Rachas; Andrew J Farmer; Marco Inzitari; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-07

Review 9.  eHealth for Patient Engagement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Serena Barello; Stefano Triberti; Guendalina Graffigna; Chiara Libreri; Silvia Serino; Judith Hibbard; Giuseppe Riva
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-08

Review 10.  Electronic Consultation in Primary Care Between Providers and Patients: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Freda Mold; Jane Hendy; Yi-Ling Lai; Simon de Lusignan
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2019-12-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Telemedicine monitoring in the follow-up of kidney transplant recipients: consensus indications from an Italian panel of surgeons and nephrologists after the COVID-19 experience.

Authors:  Luigi Biancone; Enrico Minetti; Paride De Rosa; Paolo Rigotti; Giovanni Stallone; Marco Volpe; Franco Citterio
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 2.  Patient perspectives and experiences of remote consultations in people receiving kidney care: A scoping review.

Authors:  Catriona Ewart; Jyoti Baharani; Martin Wilkie; Nicola Thomas
Journal:  J Ren Care       Date:  2022-03-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.