Ruiming Li1, Chun-Yu Lin1,2,3, Wei-Feng Guo4, Tatsuya Akutsu5. 1. Bioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto, 611-0011, Japan. 2. Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 300, Hsinchu, Taiwan. 3. Center for Intelligent Drug Systems and Smart Bio-devices, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 300, Hsinchu, Taiwan. 4. School of Electrical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, 450001, Zhengzhou, China. 5. Bioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Uji, Kyoto, 611-0011, Japan. takutsu@kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, many computational methods have been proposed to predict cancer genes. One typical kind of method is to find the differentially expressed genes between tumour and normal samples. However, there are also some genes, for example, 'dark' genes, that play important roles at the network level but are difficult to find by traditional differential gene expression analysis. In addition, network controllability methods, such as the minimum feedback vertex set (MFVS) method, have been used frequently in cancer gene prediction. However, the weights of vertices (or genes) are ignored in the traditional MFVS methods, leading to difficulty in finding the optimal solution because of the existence of many possible MFVSs. RESULTS: Here, we introduce a novel method, called weighted MFVS (WMFVS), which integrates the gene differential expression value with MFVS to select the maximum-weighted MFVS from all possible MFVSs in a protein interaction network. Our experimental results show that WMFVS achieves better performance than using traditional bio-data or network-data analyses alone. CONCLUSION: This method balances the advantage of differential gene expression analyses and network analyses, improves the low accuracy of differential gene expression analyses and decreases the instability of pure network analyses. Furthermore, WMFVS can be easily applied to various kinds of networks, providing a useful framework for data analysis and prediction.
BACKGROUND: Recently, many computational methods have been proposed to predict cancer genes. One typical kind of method is to find the differentially expressed genes between tumour and normal samples. However, there are also some genes, for example, 'dark' genes, that play important roles at the network level but are difficult to find by traditional differential gene expression analysis. In addition, network controllability methods, such as the minimum feedback vertex set (MFVS) method, have been used frequently in cancer gene prediction. However, the weights of vertices (or genes) are ignored in the traditional MFVS methods, leading to difficulty in finding the optimal solution because of the existence of many possible MFVSs. RESULTS: Here, we introduce a novel method, called weighted MFVS (WMFVS), which integrates the gene differential expression value with MFVS to select the maximum-weighted MFVS from all possible MFVSs in a protein interaction network. Our experimental results show that WMFVS achieves better performance than using traditional bio-data or network-data analyses alone. CONCLUSION: This method balances the advantage of differential gene expression analyses and network analyses, improves the low accuracy of differential gene expression analyses and decreases the instability of pure network analyses. Furthermore, WMFVS can be easily applied to various kinds of networks, providing a useful framework for data analysis and prediction.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer gene; Differential gene expression; Feedback vertex set
Authors: Arunachalam Vinayagam; Ulrich Stelzl; Raphaele Foulle; Stephanie Plassmann; Martina Zenkner; Jan Timm; Heike E Assmus; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro; Erich E Wanker Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Seoung Wan Chae; Jin Hee Sohn; Dong-Hoon Kim; Yoon Jung Choi; Yong Lai Park; Kyungeun Kim; Young Hye Cho; Jung-Soo Pyo; Jun Ho Kim Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 2.759
Authors: Zbyslaw Sondka; Sally Bamford; Charlotte G Cole; Sari A Ward; Ian Dunham; Simon A Forbes Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Mark T W Ebbert; Tanner D Jensen; Karen Jansen-West; Jonathon P Sens; Joseph S Reddy; Perry G Ridge; John S K Kauwe; Veronique Belzil; Luc Pregent; Minerva M Carrasquillo; Dirk Keene; Eric Larson; Paul Crane; Yan W Asmann; Nilufer Ertekin-Taner; Steven G Younkin; Owen A Ross; Rosa Rademakers; Leonard Petrucelli; John D Fryer Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2019-05-20 Impact factor: 13.583