Literature DB >> 33751584

The use of simulation in occupational therapy education: A scoping review.

Terri Grant1, Yvonne Thomas1, Peter Gossman1, Liz Berragan2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Simulated learning experiences are a common feature of many health professions' pre-registration curricula. However, the use of simulation within occupational therapy is still largely undefined. This scoping review seeks to identify and summarise the available evidence exploring the use of simulation within occupational therapy pre-registration education.
METHODS: A search was conducted in four databases for articles published between 2009 and 2020 to identify international literature relevant to the use of simulation within occupational therapy education. Articles were evaluated using the appropriate Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool and key features and benefits of current simulation education were identified using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 32 papers were included within the review. Four themes were identified and explored: simulation methods, authenticity, global approaches to simulation, and relationship to practice education.
CONCLUSION: Simulation is taking place in many different forms within occupational therapy internationally. It is positively received by students and may provide an effective replacement for practice education if focussed on professional standards and competencies. Further research into the potential effectiveness of simulation in relation to practice learning is indicated.
© 2021 The Authors. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Occupational Therapy Australia.

Year:  2021        PMID: 33751584     DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Occup Ther J        ISSN: 0045-0766            Impact factor:   1.856


  1 in total

1.  An exploration of the use of 3D printed foot models and simulated foot lesions to supplement scalpel skill training in undergraduate podiatry students: A multiple method study.

Authors:  Helen A Banwell; Ryan S Causby; Alyson J Crozier; Brendan Nettle; Carolyn Murray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.