Literature DB >> 33751481

Working memory load reduces the electrocortical processing of positive pictures.

Blake Barley1, Elizabeth A Bauer1, Kayla A Wilson1, Annmarie MacNamara2.   

Abstract

To date, the emotion regulation literature has focused primarily on the down-regulation of negative emotion, with far fewer studies interrogating the mechanisms at work in positive emotion regulation. This body of work has suggested that nonaffective mechanisms, such as cognitive load have a role to play in reducing emotional response. For example, the late positive potential (LPP), which tracks attention to salient stimuli, is reduced when task-irrelevant negative and neutral stimuli are presented under high compared with low working memory load. Using positive stimuli, working memory load has been shown to reduce the LPP elicited by positive words and faces but has not previously been shown to modulate the LPP elicited by positive scenes. Emotional scenes are the predominant type of stimuli used in the broader emotion regulation literature, are more arousing than faces, and have been shown to more strongly modulate the LPP. Here, 41 participants performed a working memory task interspersed with the presentation of positive and neutral scenes, while electroencephalography was recorded. Results showed that the LPP was increased for positive compared with neutral pictures and reduced on high-load compared to low-load trials. Working memory performance was worse on high-load compared with low-load trials, although it was not significantly correlated with the LPP, and picture type did not affect working memory performance. Results bridge to the willful emotion regulation literature to increase understanding of the mechanisms underlying positive emotion regulation, which has been relatively unexamined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive load; Distraction; Emotion regulation; Event-related potential (ERP); Late positive potential (LPP); Positive scenes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33751481      PMCID: PMC8639209          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-021-00875-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  48 in total

1.  Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report.

Authors:  B N Cuthbert; H T Schupp; M M Bradley; N Birbaumer; P J Lang
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Emotional targets: evaluative categorization as a function of context and content.

Authors:  Anna Weinberg; Joseph Hilgard; Bruce D Bartholow; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Intentional modulation of emotional responding to unpleasant pictures: an ERP study.

Authors:  Jason S Moser; Greg Hajcak; Emily Bukay; Robert F Simons
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Neural correlates of positive and negative emotion regulation.

Authors:  Sang Hee Kim; Stephan Hamann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Tell me about it: neural activity elicited by emotional pictures and preceding descriptions.

Authors:  Annmarie Macnamara; Dan Foti; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2009-08

Review 6.  Components of verbal working memory: evidence from neuroimaging.

Authors:  E E Smith; J Jonides; C Marshuetz; R A Koeppe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Physiological and neural correlates of worry and rumination: Support for the contrast avoidance model of worry.

Authors:  Elisa C K Steinfurth; Manuela G Alius; Julia Wendt; Alfons O Hamm
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Turning off hot feelings: Down-regulation of sexual desire using distraction and situation-focused reappraisal.

Authors:  Roni Shafir; Leemor Zucker; Gal Sheppes
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Emotional Interference in Early Adolescence: Positive Reinforcement Modulates the Behavioral and Neural Effects of Negative Emotional Distracters.

Authors:  Neil P Jones; Michael Schlund; Rebecca Kerestes; Cecile D Ladouceur
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Derailing the streetcar named desire. Cognitive distractions reduce individual differences in cravings and unhealthy snacking in response to palatable food.

Authors:  Lotte F van Dillen; Jackie Andrade
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.