| Literature DB >> 33751179 |
E Borkowska1,2, K Brudecki3, M Kostkiewicz4,2, K Gorzkiewicz5, R Misiak5, E Nalichowska5, J Miszczyk5, T Mróz6.
Abstract
This paper presents results of measurements of 99mTc activity concentration in air and nuclear medical personnel blood during ventilation-perfusion SPECT lung scans. 99mTc activity measurements were conducted at the Nuclear Medicine Department, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow. Technicians and nurses who perform examinations were equipped with personal aspirators enabling air sampling to determine the radiation exposure at their workplaces. Measurements allowed to evaluate the concentration of 99mTc in 14 air samples and it ranged from 7800 ± 600 to 10,000 ± 1000 Bq m-3 for air samples collected by technicians and from 390 ± 30 to 600 ± 40 Bq m-3 for air samples collected by nurses. In addition 99mTc concentrations in blood of medical personnel were determined in 24 samples. For technicians the maximum 99mTc blood concentration levels reached 920 ± 70 Bq L-1 and 1300 ± 100 Bq L-1. In the case of nurses, the maximum estimated activity concentrations were about ten times lower, namely 71 ± 7 Bq L-1 and 39 ± 3 Bq L-1. Although the intakes appear to be relatively high, the resulting annual effective doses are about 34 µSv for technicians and only 2 µSv for nurses.Entities:
Keywords: 99mTc; Air; Blood; Dose; Internal contamination; Medical personnel
Year: 2021 PMID: 33751179 PMCID: PMC8116248 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-021-00905-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys ISSN: 0301-634X Impact factor: 1.925
Fig. 1Personal aspirator for air sampling, a aspirator, b Petryanov filter FPP-15–1.5, c aspirator worn by medical personnel
Results of 99mTc concentration measurements in air samples collected using personal air aspirators (C) and calculated daily intakes (Id)
| Sample | ||
|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | ||
| Technician | 8600 ± 600 | 41,000 ± 3000 |
| Nurse | 460 ± 30 | 2200 ± 200 |
| Day 2 | ||
| Technician | 7800 ± 600 | 37,000 ± 3000 |
| Nurse | 600 ± 40 | 2900 ± 200 |
| Day 3 | ||
| Technician | 9100 ± 700 | 44,000 ± 3000 |
| Nurse | 530 ± 40 | 2500 ± 200 |
| Day 4 | ||
| Technician | 10,000 ± 1000 | 48,000 ± 5000 |
| Nurse | 500 ± 40 | 2400 ± 200 |
| Day 5 | ||
| Technician | 9200 ± 700 | 44,000 ± 3000 |
| Nurse | 490 ± 40 | 2400 ± 200 |
| Day 6 | ||
| Technician | 9500 ± 700 | 46,000 ± 3000 |
| Nurse | 390 ± 30 | 1900 ± 100 |
| Average | ||
| Technician | 9000 ± 800 | 43,000 ± 4000 |
| Nurse | 500 ± 70 | 2400 ± 300 |
| Day 7 (references level*) | ||
| Technician | < MDC | – |
| Nurse | < MDC | – |
The results are presented with one sigma uncertainty, or in the case of average values standard deviations
*Measurements were carried out when ventilation–perfusion scans were not performed
Fig. 299mTc activity in blood of two technicians (top panels) and two nurses (bottom panels). Error bars represent one sigma measurement error