INTRODUCTION: We examined differences in negative attitudes toward vaccines in general, and intentions to vaccinate against Covid-19 specifically, by smoking status in a large sample of adults in the UK. METHOD: Data were from 29 148 adults participating in the Covid-19 Social Study in September-October 2020. Linear regression analyses examined associations between smoking status (current/former/never) and four types of general negative vaccine attitudes: mistrust of vaccine benefit, worries about unforeseen effects, concerns about commercial profiteering, and preference for natural immunity. Multinomial logistic regression examined associations between smoking status and uncertainty and unwillingness to be vaccinated for Covid-19. Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics and diagnosed health conditions. RESULTS: Relative to never and former smokers, current smokers reported significantly greater mistrust of vaccine benefit, were more worried about unforeseen future effects, had greater concerns about commercial profiteering, and had a stronger preference for natural immunity (Badjs 0.16-0.36, p < .001). Current smokers were more likely to be uncertain (27.6% vs. 22.7% of never smokers, RRadj 1.43 [95% confidence interval = 1.31-1.56]; vs. 19.3% of former smokers, RRadj 1.55 [1.41-1.73]) or unwilling (21.5% vs. 11.6% of never smokers, RRadj 2.12 [1.91-2.34]; vs. 14.7% of former smokers, RRadj 1.53 [1.37-1.71]) to receive a Covid-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Current smokers hold more negative attitudes toward vaccines in general, and are more likely to be undecided or unwilling to vaccinate against Covid-19, compared with never and former smokers. With a disproportionately high number of smokers belonging to socially clustered and disadvantaged socioeconomic groups, lower vaccine uptake in this group could also exacerbate health inequalities. IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest that without intervention, smokers will be less likely than nonsmokers to take up the offer of a Covid-19 vaccine when offered. Targeted policy action may be required to ensure that low uptake of Covid-19 vaccination programs does not compound health inequalities between smokers and nonsmokers.
INTRODUCTION: We examined differences in negative attitudes toward vaccines in general, and intentions to vaccinate against Covid-19 specifically, by smoking status in a large sample of adults in the UK. METHOD: Data were from 29 148 adults participating in the Covid-19 Social Study in September-October 2020. Linear regression analyses examined associations between smoking status (current/former/never) and four types of general negative vaccine attitudes: mistrust of vaccine benefit, worries about unforeseen effects, concerns about commercial profiteering, and preference for natural immunity. Multinomial logistic regression examined associations between smoking status and uncertainty and unwillingness to be vaccinated for Covid-19. Covariates included sociodemographic characteristics and diagnosed health conditions. RESULTS: Relative to never and former smokers, current smokers reported significantly greater mistrust of vaccine benefit, were more worried about unforeseen future effects, had greater concerns about commercial profiteering, and had a stronger preference for natural immunity (Badjs 0.16-0.36, p < .001). Current smokers were more likely to be uncertain (27.6% vs. 22.7% of never smokers, RRadj 1.43 [95% confidence interval = 1.31-1.56]; vs. 19.3% of former smokers, RRadj 1.55 [1.41-1.73]) or unwilling (21.5% vs. 11.6% of never smokers, RRadj 2.12 [1.91-2.34]; vs. 14.7% of former smokers, RRadj 1.53 [1.37-1.71]) to receive a Covid-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Current smokers hold more negative attitudes toward vaccines in general, and are more likely to be undecided or unwilling to vaccinate against Covid-19, compared with never and former smokers. With a disproportionately high number of smokers belonging to socially clustered and disadvantaged socioeconomic groups, lower vaccine uptake in this group could also exacerbate health inequalities. IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest that without intervention, smokers will be less likely than nonsmokers to take up the offer of a Covid-19 vaccine when offered. Targeted policy action may be required to ensure that low uptake of Covid-19 vaccination programs does not compound health inequalities between smokers and nonsmokers.
Authors: Punam Mangtani; Elizabeth Breeze; Sari Kovats; Edmond S W Ng; Jennifer A Roberts; Astrid Fletcher Journal: Prev Med Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Peng-jun Lu; Amparo Gonzalez-Feliciano; Helen Ding; Leah N Bryan; David Yankey; Elizabeth A Monsell; Stacie M Greby; Gary L Euler Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2013-02-15 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Matthew D Shin; Sourabh Shukla; Young Hun Chung; Veronique Beiss; Soo Khim Chan; Oscar A Ortega-Rivera; David M Wirth; Angela Chen; Markus Sack; Jonathan K Pokorski; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Daniel Freeman; Bao S Loe; Andrew Chadwick; Cristian Vaccari; Felicity Waite; Laina Rosebrock; Lucy Jenner; Ariane Petit; Stephan Lewandowsky; Samantha Vanderslott; Stefania Innocenti; Michael Larkin; Alberto Giubilini; Ly-Mee Yu; Helen McShane; Andrew J Pollard; Sinéad Lambe Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2020-12-11 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Mangalakumari Jeyanathan; Sam Afkhami; Fiona Smaill; Matthew S Miller; Brian D Lichty; Zhou Xing Journal: Nat Rev Immunol Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 53.106
Authors: Gilbert Sterling Octavius; Theo Audi Yanto; Rivaldo Steven Heriyanto; Haviza Nisa; Catherine Ienawi; H Emildan Pasai Journal: Vacunas Date: 2022-06-20
Authors: Nicolle M Krebs; Gail D'Souza; Candace Bordner; Sophia I Allen; Andrea L Hobkirk; Jonathan Foulds; Jessica M Yingst Journal: Tob Use Insights Date: 2021-12-20