Manjot Kaur Grewal1,2, Shruti Chandra1,2, Sarega Gurudas1, Rajna Rasheed2, Piyali Sen2, Deepthy Menon2, Alan Bird1, Glen Jeffery1, Sobha Sivaprasad3,4. 1. Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK. 2. NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK. 3. Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK. sobha.sivaprasad@nhs.net. 4. NIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK. sobha.sivaprasad@nhs.net.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate functional clinical endpoints and their structural correlations in AMD, with a focus on subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDD). METHODS: This prospective study enroled 50 participants (11 controls, 17 intermediate AMD (iAMD) with no SDD, 11 iAMD with SDD and 11 non-foveal atrophic AMD). Participants underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), low luminance questionnaire (LLQ), scotopic thresholds, rod-intercept time (RIT), photopic flicker electroretinograms and multimodal imaging. Functional and structural relationships were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with healthy participants, BCVA, LLVA, scotopic thresholds were depressed, and RIT prolonged in iAMD patients with SDD (p = 0.028, p = 0.045, p = 0.014 and p < 0.0001 respectively). Patients with SDD also had reduced scotopic function and delayed RIT compared to iAMD without SDD (p = 0.005 and p < 0.0001). Eyes with SDD and non-foveal atrophy did not differ functionally. Nor did healthy subjects compared with iAMD without SDD. Functional parameters were significantly associated with scotopic thresholds (r = 0.39-0.64). BCVA, LLVA and scotopic thresholds correlated well with ONL volume, ONL thickness and choroidal thickness (r = 0.34-0.61). CONCLUSION: Eyes with SDD are surrogate markers of photoreceptor abnormalities comparable with non-central atrophy and should be sub-analysed in clinical trials evaluating potential prophylactic agents to decrease the progression of AMD and may even require different therapeutic interventions.
PURPOSE: To evaluate functional clinical endpoints and their structural correlations in AMD, with a focus on subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDD). METHODS: This prospective study enroled 50 participants (11 controls, 17 intermediate AMD (iAMD) with no SDD, 11 iAMD with SDD and 11 non-foveal atrophic AMD). Participants underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), low luminance questionnaire (LLQ), scotopic thresholds, rod-intercept time (RIT), photopic flicker electroretinograms and multimodal imaging. Functional and structural relationships were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with healthy participants, BCVA, LLVA, scotopic thresholds were depressed, and RIT prolonged in iAMD patients with SDD (p = 0.028, p = 0.045, p = 0.014 and p < 0.0001 respectively). Patients with SDD also had reduced scotopic function and delayed RIT compared to iAMD without SDD (p = 0.005 and p < 0.0001). Eyes with SDD and non-foveal atrophy did not differ functionally. Nor did healthy subjects compared with iAMD without SDD. Functional parameters were significantly associated with scotopic thresholds (r = 0.39-0.64). BCVA, LLVA and scotopic thresholds correlated well with ONL volume, ONL thickness and choroidal thickness (r = 0.34-0.61). CONCLUSION: Eyes with SDD are surrogate markers of photoreceptor abnormalities comparable with non-central atrophy and should be sub-analysed in clinical trials evaluating potential prophylactic agents to decrease the progression of AMD and may even require different therapeutic interventions.