| Literature DB >> 33750803 |
Sara Assecondi1,2, Rong Hu3,4,5, Gail Eskes6, Xiaoping Pan5, Jin Zhou5, Kim Shapiro3,4.
Abstract
Interventions to improve working memory, e.g. by combining task rehearsal and non-invasive brain stimulation, are gaining popularity. Many factors, however, affect the outcome of these interventions. We hypothesize that working memory capacity at baseline predicts how an individual performs on a working memory task, by setting limits on the benefit derived from tDCS when combined with strategy instructions; specifically, we hypothesize that individuals with low capacity will benefit the most. Eighty-four participants underwent two sessions of an adaptive working memory task (n-back) on two consecutive days. Participants were split into four independent groups (SHAM vs ACTIVE stimulation and STRATEGY vs no STRATEGY instructions). For the purpose of analysis, individuals were divided based on their baseline working memory capacity. Results support our prediction that the combination of tDCS and strategy instructions is particularly beneficial in low capacity individuals. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of factors affecting the outcome of tDCS when used in conjunction with cognitive training to improve working memory. Moreover, our results have implications for training regimens, e.g., by designing interventions predicated on baseline cognitive abilities, or focusing on strategy development for specific attentional skills.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33750803 PMCID: PMC7943602 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84298-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996