Niklas Sörlén1,2, Andreas Hult2,3,4, Peter Nordström5, Anna Nordström2,4,6, Jonas Johansson7,8,9. 1. Department of Clinical Science, Neurosciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 2. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section for Sustainable Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 3. Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Section for Sports Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 4. Umeå School of Sport Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 5. Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Geriatric Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 6. School of Sport Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 7. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section for Sustainable Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. jonas.johansson@umu.se. 8. Umeå School of Sport Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. jonas.johansson@umu.se. 9. Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. jonas.johansson@umu.se.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the effectiveness of 4 weeks of balance exercise compared with no intervention on objectively measured postural sway. METHODS: This was a single-center parallel randomized controlled, open label, trial. A six-sided dice was used for allocation at a 1:1-ratio between exercise and control. The trial was performed at a university hospital clinic in Sweden and recruited community-dwelling older adults with documented postural instability. The intervention consisted of progressively challenging balance exercise three times per week, during 4 weeks, with follow-up at week five. Main outcome measures were objective postural sway length during eyes open and eyes closed conditions. RESULTS:Sixty-five participants aged 70 years (balanceexercise n = 32; no intervention n = 33) were randomized. 14 participants were excluded from analysis because of early dropout before follow-up at week five, leaving 51 (n = 22; n = 29) participants for analysis. No significant differences were detected between the groups in any of the postural sway outcomes. Within-group analyses showed significant improvements in hand grip strength for the intervention group, while Timed Up & Go improvements were comparable between groups but only statistically significant in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Performing balance exercise over a four-week intervention period did not acutely improve postural sway in balance-deficient older adults. The lower limit in duration and frequency to achieve positive effects remains unclear. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT03227666 , July 24, 2017, retrospectively registered.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the effectiveness of 4 weeks of balance exercise compared with no intervention on objectively measured postural sway. METHODS: This was a single-center parallel randomized controlled, open label, trial. A six-sided dice was used for allocation at a 1:1-ratio between exercise and control. The trial was performed at a university hospital clinic in Sweden and recruited community-dwelling older adults with documented postural instability. The intervention consisted of progressively challenging balance exercise three times per week, during 4 weeks, with follow-up at week five. Main outcome measures were objective postural sway length during eyes open and eyes closed conditions. RESULTS: Sixty-five participants aged 70 years (balance exercise n = 32; no intervention n = 33) were randomized. 14 participants were excluded from analysis because of early dropout before follow-up at week five, leaving 51 (n = 22; n = 29) participants for analysis. No significant differences were detected between the groups in any of the postural sway outcomes. Within-group analyses showed significant improvements in hand grip strength for the intervention group, while Timed Up & Go improvements were comparable between groups but only statistically significant in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Performing balance exercise over a four-week intervention period did not acutely improve postural sway in balance-deficient older adults. The lower limit in duration and frequency to achieve positive effects remains unclear. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT03227666 , July 24, 2017, retrospectively registered.
Authors: Chang Ho Song; Jerrold S Petrofsky; Seung Won Lee; Kyoung Jin Lee; Jong Eun Yim Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 6.118