Kanhaiya Kumar1, Vishwesh Venkatraman2, Per Bruheim3. 1. Department of Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway. 2. Department of Chemistry, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway. 3. Department of Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491, Trondheim, Norway. Per.Bruheim@ntnu.no.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a well-known popular model system for basic biological studies and serves as a host organism for the heterologous production of commercially interesting small molecules and proteins. The central metabolism is at the core to provide building blocks and energy to support growth and survival in normal situations as well as during exogenous stresses and forced heterologous protein production. Here, we present a comprehensive study of intracellular central metabolite pool profiling when growing S. cerevisiae on different carbon sources in batch cultivations and at different growth rates in nutrient-limited glucose chemostats. The latest versions of absolute quantitative mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling methodology were applied to cover glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathway metabolites, tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), complete amino acid, and deoxy-/nucleoside phosphate pools. RESULTS: Glutamate, glutamine, alanine, and citrate were the four most abundant metabolites for most conditions tested. The amino acid is the dominant metabolite class even though a marked relative reduction compared to the other metabolite classes was observed for nitrogen and phosphate limited chemostats. Interestingly, glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) metabolites display the largest variation among the cultivation conditions while the nucleoside phosphate pools are more stable and vary within a closer concentration window. The overall trends for glucose and nitrogen-limited chemostats were increased metabolite pools with the increasing growth rate. Next, comparing the chosen chemostat reference growth rate (0.12 h-1, approximate one-fourth of maximal unlimited growth rate) illuminates an interesting pattern: almost all pools are lower in nitrogen and phosphate limited conditions compared to glucose limitation, except for the TCA metabolites citrate, isocitrate and α-ketoglutarate. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new knowledge-how the central metabolism is adapting to various cultivations conditions and growth rates which is essential for expanding our understanding of cellular metabolism and the development of improved phenotypes in metabolic engineering.
BACKGROUND:Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a well-known popular model system for basic biological studies and serves as a host organism for the heterologous production of commercially interesting small molecules and proteins. The central metabolism is at the core to provide building blocks and energy to support growth and survival in normal situations as well as during exogenous stresses and forced heterologous protein production. Here, we present a comprehensive study of intracellular central metabolite pool profiling when growing S. cerevisiae on different carbon sources in batch cultivations and at different growth rates in nutrient-limited glucose chemostats. The latest versions of absolute quantitative mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling methodology were applied to cover glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathway metabolites, tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), complete amino acid, and deoxy-/nucleoside phosphate pools. RESULTS:Glutamate, glutamine, alanine, and citrate were the four most abundant metabolites for most conditions tested. The amino acid is the dominant metabolite class even though a marked relative reduction compared to the other metabolite classes was observed for nitrogen and phosphate limited chemostats. Interestingly, glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) metabolites display the largest variation among the cultivation conditions while the nucleoside phosphate pools are more stable and vary within a closer concentration window. The overall trends for glucose and nitrogen-limited chemostats were increased metabolite pools with the increasing growth rate. Next, comparing the chosen chemostat reference growth rate (0.12 h-1, approximate one-fourth of maximal unlimited growth rate) illuminates an interesting pattern: almost all pools are lower in nitrogen and phosphate limited conditions compared to glucose limitation, except for the TCA metabolites citrate, isocitrate and α-ketoglutarate. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new knowledge-how the central metabolism is adapting to various cultivations conditions and growth rates which is essential for expanding our understanding of cellular metabolism and the development of improved phenotypes in metabolic engineering.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bioreactor; Chemostat; Glycolysis; Mass Spectrometry; Metabolomics; Physiology; Yeast
Authors: Bryson D Bennett; Elizabeth H Kimball; Melissa Gao; Robin Osterhout; Stephen J Van Dien; Joshua D Rabinowitz Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2009-06-28 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Kieran Smallbone; Hanan L Messiha; Kathleen M Carroll; Catherine L Winder; Naglis Malys; Warwick B Dunn; Ettore Murabito; Neil Swainston; Joseph O Dada; Farid Khan; Pınar Pir; Evangelos Simeonidis; Irena Spasić; Jill Wishart; Dieter Weichart; Neil W Hayes; Daniel Jameson; David S Broomhead; Stephen G Oliver; Simon J Gaskell; John E G McCarthy; Norman W Paton; Hans V Westerhoff; Douglas B Kell; Pedro Mendes Journal: FEBS Lett Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 4.124
Authors: Timothy Jewison; Craig Knox; Vanessa Neveu; Yannick Djoumbou; An Chi Guo; Jacqueline Lee; Philip Liu; Rupasri Mandal; Ram Krishnamurthy; Igor Sinelnikov; Michael Wilson; David S Wishart Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: David S Wishart; Dan Tzur; Craig Knox; Roman Eisner; An Chi Guo; Nelson Young; Dean Cheng; Kevin Jewell; David Arndt; Summit Sawhney; Chris Fung; Lisa Nikolai; Mike Lewis; Marie-Aude Coutouly; Ian Forsythe; Peter Tang; Savita Shrivastava; Kevin Jeroncic; Paul Stothard; Godwin Amegbey; David Block; David D Hau; James Wagner; Jessica Miniaci; Melisa Clements; Mulu Gebremedhin; Natalie Guo; Ying Zhang; Gavin E Duggan; Glen D Macinnis; Alim M Weljie; Reza Dowlatabadi; Fiona Bamforth; Derrick Clive; Russ Greiner; Liang Li; Tom Marrie; Brian D Sykes; Hans J Vogel; Lori Querengesser Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: An Chi Guo; Timothy Jewison; Michael Wilson; Yifeng Liu; Craig Knox; Yannick Djoumbou; Patrick Lo; Rupasri Mandal; Ram Krishnamurthy; David S Wishart Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2012-10-29 Impact factor: 16.971