Literature DB >> 33750414

Adaptation of central metabolite pools to variations in growth rate and cultivation conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Kanhaiya Kumar1, Vishwesh Venkatraman2, Per Bruheim3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a well-known popular model system for basic biological studies and serves as a host organism for the heterologous production of commercially interesting small molecules and proteins. The central metabolism is at the core to provide building blocks and energy to support growth and survival in normal situations as well as during exogenous stresses and forced heterologous protein production. Here, we present a comprehensive study of intracellular central metabolite pool profiling when growing S. cerevisiae on different carbon sources in batch cultivations and at different growth rates in nutrient-limited glucose chemostats. The latest versions of absolute quantitative mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling methodology were applied to cover glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathway metabolites, tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), complete amino acid, and deoxy-/nucleoside phosphate pools.
RESULTS: Glutamate, glutamine, alanine, and citrate were the four most abundant metabolites for most conditions tested. The amino acid is the dominant metabolite class even though a marked relative reduction compared to the other metabolite classes was observed for nitrogen and phosphate limited chemostats. Interestingly, glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) metabolites display the largest variation among the cultivation conditions while the nucleoside phosphate pools are more stable and vary within a closer concentration window. The overall trends for glucose and nitrogen-limited chemostats were increased metabolite pools with the increasing growth rate. Next, comparing the chosen chemostat reference growth rate (0.12 h-1, approximate one-fourth of maximal unlimited growth rate) illuminates an interesting pattern: almost all pools are lower in nitrogen and phosphate limited conditions compared to glucose limitation, except for the TCA metabolites citrate, isocitrate and α-ketoglutarate.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new knowledge-how the central metabolism is adapting to various cultivations conditions and growth rates which is essential for expanding our understanding of cellular metabolism and the development of improved phenotypes in metabolic engineering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioreactor; Chemostat; Glycolysis; Mass Spectrometry; Metabolomics; Physiology; Yeast

Year:  2021        PMID: 33750414      PMCID: PMC7941957          DOI: 10.1186/s12934-021-01557-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Cell Fact        ISSN: 1475-2859            Impact factor:   5.328


  36 in total

Review 1.  From systems biology to metabolically engineered cells-an omics perspective on the development of industrial microbes.

Authors:  Judith Becker; Christoph Wittmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 7.934

2.  Intracellular characterization of aerobic glucose metabolism in seven yeast species by 13C flux analysis and metabolomics.

Authors:  Stefan Christen; Uwe Sauer
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 3.  Engineering Cellular Metabolism.

Authors:  Jens Nielsen; Jay D Keasling
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Absolute metabolite concentrations and implied enzyme active site occupancy in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Bryson D Bennett; Elizabeth H Kimball; Melissa Gao; Robin Osterhout; Stephen J Van Dien; Joshua D Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 15.040

5.  Understanding the metabolic burden of recombinant antibody production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a quantitative metabolomics approach.

Authors:  Jorg C de Ruijter; Essi V Koskela; Jatin Nandania; Alexander D Frey; Vidya Velagapudi
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.239

6.  A model of yeast glycolysis based on a consistent kinetic characterisation of all its enzymes.

Authors:  Kieran Smallbone; Hanan L Messiha; Kathleen M Carroll; Catherine L Winder; Naglis Malys; Warwick B Dunn; Ettore Murabito; Neil Swainston; Joseph O Dada; Farid Khan; Pınar Pir; Evangelos Simeonidis; Irena Spasić; Jill Wishart; Dieter Weichart; Neil W Hayes; Daniel Jameson; David S Broomhead; Stephen G Oliver; Simon J Gaskell; John E G McCarthy; Norman W Paton; Hans V Westerhoff; Douglas B Kell; Pedro Mendes
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  YMDB: the Yeast Metabolome Database.

Authors:  Timothy Jewison; Craig Knox; Vanessa Neveu; Yannick Djoumbou; An Chi Guo; Jacqueline Lee; Philip Liu; Rupasri Mandal; Ram Krishnamurthy; Igor Sinelnikov; Michael Wilson; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  HMDB: the Human Metabolome Database.

Authors:  David S Wishart; Dan Tzur; Craig Knox; Roman Eisner; An Chi Guo; Nelson Young; Dean Cheng; Kevin Jewell; David Arndt; Summit Sawhney; Chris Fung; Lisa Nikolai; Mike Lewis; Marie-Aude Coutouly; Ian Forsythe; Peter Tang; Savita Shrivastava; Kevin Jeroncic; Paul Stothard; Godwin Amegbey; David Block; David D Hau; James Wagner; Jessica Miniaci; Melisa Clements; Mulu Gebremedhin; Natalie Guo; Ying Zhang; Gavin E Duggan; Glen D Macinnis; Alim M Weljie; Reza Dowlatabadi; Fiona Bamforth; Derrick Clive; Russ Greiner; Liang Li; Tom Marrie; Brian D Sykes; Hans J Vogel; Lori Querengesser
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  ECMDB: the E. coli Metabolome Database.

Authors:  An Chi Guo; Timothy Jewison; Michael Wilson; Yifeng Liu; Craig Knox; Yannick Djoumbou; Patrick Lo; Rupasri Mandal; Ram Krishnamurthy; David S Wishart
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Predicting complex phenotype-genotype interactions to enable yeast engineering: Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism and a cell factory.

Authors:  Duygu Dikicioglu; Pınar Pir; Stephen G Oliver
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  3 in total

1.  Serum-free cultures of C2C12 cells show different muscle phenotypes which can be estimated by metabolic profiling.

Authors:  Mi Jang; Jana Scheffold; Lisa Marie Røst; Hyejeong Cheon; Per Bruheim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Nutrient-depended metabolic switching during batch cultivation of Streptomyces coelicolor explored with absolute quantitative mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling.

Authors:  Kanhaiya Kumar; Per Bruheim
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  Kinetic Modeling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Central Carbon Metabolism: Achievements, Limitations, and Opportunities.

Authors:  David Lao-Martil; Koen J A Verhagen; Joep P J Schmitz; Bas Teusink; S Aljoscha Wahl; Natal A W van Riel
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-01-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.