Literature DB >> 33750343

A new machine learning approach for predicting likelihood of recurrence following ablation for atrial fibrillation from CT.

Mina K Chung1,2,3, Anant Madabhushi4,5, Thomas Atta-Fosu6, Michael LaBarbera1, Soumya Ghose4, Paul Schoenhagen2, Walid Saliba2, Patrick J Tchou2, Bruce D Lindsay2, Milind Y Desai2, Deborah Kwon2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate left atrial shape differences on CT scans of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with (AF+) versus without (AF-) post-ablation recurrence and whether these shape differences predict AF recurrence.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 AF patients who had pre-catheter ablation cardiac CT scans with contrast. AF recurrence was defined at 1 year, excluding a 3-month post-ablation blanking period. After creating atlases of atrial models from segmented AF+ and AF- CT images, an atlas-based implicit shape differentiation method was used to identify surface of interest (SOI). After registering the SOI to each patient model, statistics of the deformation on the SOI were used to create shape descriptors. The performance in predicting AF recurrence using shape features at and outside the SOI and eight clinical factors (age, sex, left atrial volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index, sinus rhythm, and AF type [persistent vs paroxysmal], catheter-ablation type [Cryoablation vs Irrigated RF]) were compared using 100 runs of fivefold cross validation.
RESULTS: Differences in atrial shape were found surrounding the pulmonary vein ostia and the base of the left atrial appendage. In the prediction of AF recurrence, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.67 for shape features from the SOI, 0.58 for shape features outside the SOI, 0.71 for the clinical parameters, and 0.78 combining shape and clinical features.
CONCLUSION: Differences in left atrial shape were identified between AF recurrent and non-recurrent patients using pre-procedure CT scans. New radiomic features corresponding to the differences in shape were found to predict post-ablation AF recurrence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Atrial fibrillation recurrence; Atrial radiomic features; Atrial shape morphology; Left atrium; Shape differentiation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33750343      PMCID: PMC7941998          DOI: 10.1186/s12880-021-00578-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Imaging        ISSN: 1471-2342            Impact factor:   1.930


  33 in total

1.  Predicting atrial fibrillation ablation outcome: The CAAP-AF score.

Authors:  Roger A Winkle; Julian W E Jarman; R Hardwin Mead; Gregory Engel; Melissa H Kong; William Fleming; Rob A Patrawala
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Left atrial shape predicts recurrence after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

Authors:  Erik T Bieging; Alan Morris; Brent D Wilson; Christopher J McGann; Nassir F Marrouche; Joshua Cates
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-19

Review 3.  2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Common genetic variants and response to atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  M Benjamin Shoemaker; Andreas Bollmann; Steven A Lubitz; Laura Ueberham; Harsimran Saini; Jay Montgomery; Todd Edwards; Zachary Yoneda; Moritz F Sinner; Arash Arya; Philipp Sommer; Jessica Delaney; Sandeep K Goyal; Pablo Saavedra; Arvindh Kanagasundram; S Patrick Whalen; Dan M Roden; Gerhard Hindricks; Christopher R Ellis; Patrick T Ellinor; Dawood Darbar; Daniela Husser
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-02-14

5.  Polymorphism rs2200733 at chromosome 4q25 is associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation in the Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Feifei Chen; Yanzong Yang; Rongfeng Zhang; Shulong Zhang; Yingxue Dong; Xiaomeng Yin; Dong Chang; Zhiqiang Yang; Kejing Wang; Lianjun Gao; Yunlong Xia
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

6.  Structural changes of atrial myocardium due to sustained atrial fibrillation in the goat.

Authors:  J Ausma; M Wijffels; F Thoné; L Wouters; M Allessie; M Borgers
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-11-04       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Recurrence of pulmonary vein conduction and atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial of the ostial versus the extraostial ablation strategy.

Authors:  Brian Nilsson; Xu Chen; Steen Pehrson; Lars Køber; Jørgen Hilden; Jesper H Svendsen
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 8.  Structural and functional remodeling of the left atrium: clinical and therapeutic implications for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Grace Casaclang-Verzosa; Bernard J Gersh; Teresa S M Tsang
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Left atrial volume is a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation.

Authors:  Sung-Hee Shin; Mi-Young Park; Woong-Jin Oh; Soon-Jun Hong; Hui-Nam Pak; Woo-Hyuk Song; Do-Sun Lim; Young-Hoon Kim; Wan-Joo Shim
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 5.251

10.  Korean Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Network: Genetic Variants for AF Do Not Predict Ablation Success.

Authors:  Eue-Keun Choi; Jae Hyung Park; Ji-Young Lee; Chung Mo Nam; Min Ki Hwang; Jae-Sun Uhm; Boyoung Joung; Young-Guk Ko; Moon-Hyoung Lee; Steven A Lubitz; Patrick T Ellinor; Hui-Nam Pak
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Big Data in electrophysiology.

Authors:  Sotirios Nedios; Konstantinos Iliodromitis; Christopher Kowalewski; Andreas Bollmann; Gerhard Hindricks; Nikolaos Dagres; Harilaos Bogossian
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2022-02-08

2.  The right modality for the right pulmonary vein shape in ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Jonas L Isaksen; Martin Manninger; Dominik Linz
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 3.  Machine learning applications in cardiac computed tomography: a composite systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan James Hyett Bray; Moghees Ahmad Hanif; Mohammad Alradhawi; Jacob Ibbetson; Surinder Singh Dosanjh; Sabrina Lucy Smith; Mahmood Ahmad; Dominic Pimenta
Journal:  Eur Heart J Open       Date:  2022-03-17

Review 4.  Atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation : Past, present, and future developments.

Authors:  Sotirios Nedios; Frank Lindemann; Jordi Heijman; Harry J G M Crijns; Andreas Bollmann; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Machine Learning Model-Based Simple Clinical Information to Predict Decreased Left Atrial Appendage Flow Velocity.

Authors:  Chao Li; Guanhua Dou; Yipu Ding; Ran Xin; Jing Wang; Jun Guo; Yundai Chen; Junjie Yang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-03-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.