Mina K Chung1,2,3, Anant Madabhushi4,5, Thomas Atta-Fosu6, Michael LaBarbera1, Soumya Ghose4, Paul Schoenhagen2, Walid Saliba2, Patrick J Tchou2, Bruce D Lindsay2, Milind Y Desai2, Deborah Kwon2. 1. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 3. Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 4. Center for Computational Imaging and Personalized Diagnostics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 2071 Martin Luther King Drive, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7207, USA. 5. Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. 6. Center for Computational Imaging and Personalized Diagnostics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 2071 Martin Luther King Drive, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7207, USA. txa128@case.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate left atrial shape differences on CT scans of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with (AF+) versus without (AF-) post-ablation recurrence and whether these shape differences predict AF recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 AF patients who had pre-catheter ablation cardiac CT scans with contrast. AF recurrence was defined at 1 year, excluding a 3-month post-ablation blanking period. After creating atlases of atrial models from segmented AF+ and AF- CT images, an atlas-based implicit shape differentiation method was used to identify surface of interest (SOI). After registering the SOI to each patient model, statistics of the deformation on the SOI were used to create shape descriptors. The performance in predicting AF recurrence using shape features at and outside the SOI and eight clinical factors (age, sex, left atrial volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index, sinus rhythm, and AF type [persistent vs paroxysmal], catheter-ablation type [Cryoablation vs Irrigated RF]) were compared using 100 runs of fivefold cross validation. RESULTS: Differences in atrial shape were found surrounding the pulmonary vein ostia and the base of the left atrial appendage. In the prediction of AF recurrence, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.67 for shape features from the SOI, 0.58 for shape features outside the SOI, 0.71 for the clinical parameters, and 0.78 combining shape and clinical features. CONCLUSION: Differences in left atrial shape were identified between AF recurrent and non-recurrent patients using pre-procedure CT scans. New radiomic features corresponding to the differences in shape were found to predict post-ablation AF recurrence.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate left atrial shape differences on CT scans of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with (AF+) versus without (AF-) post-ablation recurrence and whether these shape differences predict AF recurrence. METHODS: This retrospective study included 68 AF patients who had pre-catheter ablation cardiac CT scans with contrast. AF recurrence was defined at 1 year, excluding a 3-month post-ablation blanking period. After creating atlases of atrial models from segmented AF+ and AF- CT images, an atlas-based implicit shape differentiation method was used to identify surface of interest (SOI). After registering the SOI to each patient model, statistics of the deformation on the SOI were used to create shape descriptors. The performance in predicting AF recurrence using shape features at and outside the SOI and eight clinical factors (age, sex, left atrial volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, body mass index, sinus rhythm, and AF type [persistent vs paroxysmal], catheter-ablation type [Cryoablation vs Irrigated RF]) were compared using 100 runs of fivefold cross validation. RESULTS: Differences in atrial shape were found surrounding the pulmonary vein ostia and the base of the left atrial appendage. In the prediction of AF recurrence, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.67 for shape features from the SOI, 0.58 for shape features outside the SOI, 0.71 for the clinical parameters, and 0.78 combining shape and clinical features. CONCLUSION: Differences in left atrial shape were identified between AF recurrent and non-recurrent patients using pre-procedure CT scans. New radiomic features corresponding to the differences in shape were found to predict post-ablation AF recurrence.
Authors: Roger A Winkle; Julian W E Jarman; R Hardwin Mead; Gregory Engel; Melissa H Kong; William Fleming; Rob A Patrawala Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2016-07-17 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Erik T Bieging; Alan Morris; Brent D Wilson; Christopher J McGann; Nassir F Marrouche; Joshua Cates Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2018-06-19
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Europace Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: M Benjamin Shoemaker; Andreas Bollmann; Steven A Lubitz; Laura Ueberham; Harsimran Saini; Jay Montgomery; Todd Edwards; Zachary Yoneda; Moritz F Sinner; Arash Arya; Philipp Sommer; Jessica Delaney; Sandeep K Goyal; Pablo Saavedra; Arvindh Kanagasundram; S Patrick Whalen; Dan M Roden; Gerhard Hindricks; Christopher R Ellis; Patrick T Ellinor; Dawood Darbar; Daniela Husser Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2015-02-14
Authors: Eue-Keun Choi; Jae Hyung Park; Ji-Young Lee; Chung Mo Nam; Min Ki Hwang; Jae-Sun Uhm; Boyoung Joung; Young-Guk Ko; Moon-Hyoung Lee; Steven A Lubitz; Patrick T Ellinor; Hui-Nam Pak Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Jonathan James Hyett Bray; Moghees Ahmad Hanif; Mohammad Alradhawi; Jacob Ibbetson; Surinder Singh Dosanjh; Sabrina Lucy Smith; Mahmood Ahmad; Dominic Pimenta Journal: Eur Heart J Open Date: 2022-03-17
Authors: Sotirios Nedios; Frank Lindemann; Jordi Heijman; Harry J G M Crijns; Andreas Bollmann; Gerhard Hindricks Journal: Herz Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 1.443